Kilowh.at - Increasing Energy Awareness Using an Interactive Energy Comparison Tool

Reducing the use of energy is important for several reasons, such as saving money and reducing impact on the climate. However, the awareness among non-experts of how much energy is required by different activities is generally low, which can lead to wrong prioritizations. In this study, we have developed an interactive tool to increase “energy awareness”. A group of 58 students first did a test to benchmark their current energy awareness, then tried the tool for 10 min, and then did the same test immediately after trying the prototype and one week after trying the prototype. In addition, they answered questions regarding which, if any, of the energy requirement of different activities surprised them, any thoughts about their own energy use aroused after using the prototype and what they thought about using the tool compared to more conventional methods of learning. The results showed a significant learning effect in energy awareness with a very strong effect size of 1.689, that they were most surprised by the energy required to produce a hamburger, 39 of 58 explicitly said they intended to change one or more aspects in order to improve their energy use, where 24 actions involved changing habits and 18 actions was of a one-time investment character. The attitude towards using such a tool instead of more conventional learning was very good and the words most frequently used to describe the tool was good, simple and easy to use, fun, and interesting, but five users also said they were bored after a while. In total the results indicate that using an interactive tool like this even for a limited time is a good way to in an efficient and fun way increase energy awareness.

[1]  Anthony Rowe,et al.  Toward the Design of a Dashboard to Promote Environmentally Sustainable Behavior among Office Workers , 2013, PERSUASIVE.

[2]  Eve E. Hoggan,et al.  Tailoring Feedback to Users' Actions in a Persuasive Game for Household Electricity Conservation , 2012, PERSUASIVE.

[3]  Marko Turpeinen,et al.  Kilograms or cups of tea: Comparing footprints for better CO2 understanding , 2011, PsychNology J..

[4]  John M. Quigley,et al.  Energy literacy, awareness, and conservation behavior of residential households , 2013 .

[5]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI , 2010, CHI.

[6]  Jan DeWaters,et al.  Energy literacy of secondary students in New York State (USA): A measure of knowledge, affect, and behavior , 2011 .

[7]  P. Berkhout,et al.  Defining the rebound effect , 2000 .

[8]  M. Newborough,et al.  Energy-use information transfer for intelligent homes : Enabling energy conservation with central and local displays , 2007 .

[9]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  S. Karjalainen Consumer preferences for feedback on household electricity consumption , 2011 .

[11]  Michael Nye,et al.  Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term , 2013 .

[12]  Cees J. H. Midden,et al.  Persuasive Appliances: Goal Priming and Behavioral Response to Product-Integrated Energy Feedback , 2006, International Conference on Persuasive Technology.

[13]  Muhammad Imran,et al.  Individual energy use and feedback in an office setting: A field trial , 2013 .

[14]  John Hattie,et al.  Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement , 2008 .

[15]  Michael Nye,et al.  Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors , 2010 .

[16]  L. Cohen,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 1980 .