Analytical and simulation-based comparison between traditional and Kalman filter-based phase-locked loops

We investigate and quantitatively analyze the similarities and differences between traditional phase-locked loops (PLLs) and Kalman filter (KF)-based PLLs. We focus on three aspects. First, the transient response of traditional and KF-based PLLs versus the steady-state bandwidth is investigated, where the transient time is used as a criterion to compare their tracking performance in the transient state. Second, the noise performance and the dynamic response of the PLL are investigated and compared, in the cases that the Doppler shift is extracted from either the velocity accumulator or the filter output. Moreover, the steady-state frequency error due to the high signal dynamics is derived. Third, a method that feeds back the frequency rate to numerically controlled oscillator (NCO) is proposed, where a detailed derivation of the quantitative mathematical relationship between the phase mismatch, the coherent integration interval and the signal dynamics is performed. The proposed method provides an effective approach to reducing the significant phase mismatch and obtaining more accurate carrier phase measurements in applications where high dynamics or long integration intervals may influence the tracking performance of the GNSS receivers.

[1]  Peter F. Driessen.  DPLL bit synchronizer with rapid acquisition using adaptive Kalman filtering techniques , 1994, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[2]  M. Simon,et al.  Improved performance of a digital phase-locked loop combined with a frequency/frequency-rate estimator , 1986 .

[3]  Bernd Eissfeller,et al.  Performance Comparison of Different Forms of Kalman Filter Approach for a Vector-Based GNSS Signal Tracking Loop , 2009 .

[4]  Bernd Eissfeller,et al.  Characteristics of Kalman Filters for GNSS Signal Tracking Loop , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  Mark G. Petovello,et al.  Choosing the coherent integration time for Kalman filter-based carrier-phase tracking of GNSS signals , 2011 .

[6]  Cillian O'Driscoll.  Comparison of Traditional and Kalman Filter Based Tracking Architectures , 2009 .

[7]  Bernd Eissfeller,et al.  A Tuning Method Based on Signal-to-Noise Power Ratio for Adaptive PLL and its Relationship with Equivalent Noise Bandwidth , 2013, IEEE Communications Letters.

[8]  Emanuela Falletti,et al.  Theoretical analysis and tuning criteria of the Kalman filter-based tracking loop , 2014, GPS Solutions.

[9]  He Xiaofeng,et al.  High dynamic carrier phase tracking based on adaptive Kalman filtering , 2011, 2011 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC).

[10]  Gérard Lachapelle,et al.  Methodology for comparing two carrier phase tracking techniques , 2011, GPS Solutions.

[11]  F. Blume,et al.  Performance of High-Rate Kinematic GPS During Strong Shaking: Observations from Shake Table Tests and the 2010 Chile Earthquake , 2011 .

[12]  Pau Closas,et al.  Particle Filtering Algorithm for Ultra-tight GNSS/INS Integration , 2008 .

[13]  Mark G. Petovello,et al.  Carrier Phase Tracking of Weak Signals Using Different Receiver Architectures , 2008 .

[14]  P. Ward,et al.  Satellite Signal Acquisition , Tracking , and Data Demodulation , 2006 .

[15]  James L. Garrison,et al.  Extended Kalman Filter-Based Tracking of Weak GPS Signals under High Dynamic Conditions , 2004 .

[16]  Gérard Lachapelle,et al.  Digital Phase Locked Loop With Frequency Rate Feedback , 2009 .

[17]  G. S. Christiansen.  Modeling of PRML timing loop as a Kalman filter , 1994, 1994 IEEE GLOBECOM. Communications: The Global Bridge.