The Potential of Non-Formal Laboratory Environments for Innovating the Chemistry Curriculum and Promoting Secondary School Level Students Education for Sustainability

Developing skills and attitudes among students in terms of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) requires that educators address issues of sustainability in both formal and non-formal education. However, up to now, ESD seems to have been insufficiently implemented in secondary science education in many countries in general, and in high school chemistry learning in particular. A lack of suitable experiments, coupled with missing teaching and learning materials and insufficient teacher professional development have been identified as the reasons for this gap. This paper describes a project of innovation and research in the field of ESD for secondary school chemistry education. Within the project, both half- and full-day learning environments have been developed for non-formal, laboratory-based learning of secondary level students at the university. The research-based development focuses on teaching-learning modules which link formal and non-formal learning. The pedagogy employed is both learner-centered and inquiry-based. All the modules focus on sustainability issues in chemistry-related contexts. Data was collected by questionnaires from teachers and students both prior to and after the visit of the non-formal learning environment. Likert-items were analyzed statistically and the evaluation of the open-ended questions was done by Qualitative Content Analysis. An overview of the project, a case from the non-formal laboratory setting, and findings from accompanying research and evaluation are discussed in this paper. Potential impacts on teacher professional development and curriculum innovation are also outlined.

[1]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[2]  J. Falk,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation in Museums : Why Does One Want to Learn ? , 2015 .

[3]  J. Osborne,et al.  Supporting Teachers on Science‐focused School Trips: Towards an integrated framework of theory and practice , 2007 .

[4]  Jesper Sjöström Eco-Driven Chemical Research in the Boundary Between Academia and Industry , 2013 .

[5]  J. Vogel Second International Handbook Of Science Education , 2016 .

[6]  Mageswary Karpudewan,et al.  Green Chemistry: Educating Prospective Science Teachers in Education for Sustainable Development at School of Educational Studies, USM , 2011 .

[7]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Science Learning , 1996 .

[8]  Jack Holbrook,et al.  The Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scientific Literacy , 2007 .

[9]  A. Pilot,et al.  How to Benefit From the Informal and Interdisciplinary Dimension of Chemistry in Teaching , 2013 .

[10]  Ingo Eilks,et al.  German chemistry teachers’ understanding of sustainability and education for sustainable development—An interview case study , 2013 .

[11]  C. Waddington Limits of Growth , 1972, Nature.

[12]  Franz Rauch,et al.  Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and chemistry education , 2012 .

[13]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Ensuring sustainability of tomorrow through green chemistry integrated with sustainable development concepts (SDCs) , 2012 .

[14]  A. Khataybeh,et al.  Education for sustainable development, an international perspective , 2010 .

[15]  Franz Rauch,et al.  Chemistry Education For Sustainability , 2015 .

[16]  Martin Braund,et al.  Towards a More Authentic Science Curriculum: The contribution of out‐of‐school learning , 2006 .

[17]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  Science Centres and Science Learning , 1996 .

[18]  J. Falk,et al.  School Field Trips: Assessing Their Long-Term Impact , 1997 .

[19]  Michael D. Burkart,et al.  Releasing Stored Solar Energy within Pond Scum: Biodiesel from Algal Lipids , 2012 .

[20]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  SOCIETAL ISSUES AND THEIR IMPORTANCE FOR CONTEMPORARY SCIENCE EDUCATION—A PEDAGOGICAL JUSTIFICATION AND THE STATE-OF-THE-ART IN ISRAEL, GERMANY, AND THE USA , 2011 .

[21]  Cynthia Passmore,et al.  Learning on zoo field trips: The interaction of the agendas and practices of students, teachers, and zoo educators , 2010 .

[22]  James Kisiel,et al.  Understanding Elementary Teacher Motivations for Science Fieldtrips. , 2005 .

[23]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[24]  Haim Eshach,et al.  Bridging In-school and Out-of-school Learning: Formal, Non-Formal, and Informal Education , 2007 .

[25]  David Anderson,et al.  Understanding Teachers' Perspectives on Field Trips: Discovering Common Ground in Three Countries , 2006 .

[26]  Inez S. Wolins,et al.  Children's Memories of Museum Field Trips: A Qualitative Study , 1992 .

[27]  E. Ziegel A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Univariate and Multivariate Statistics , 1994 .

[28]  J. DeWitt,et al.  A Short Review of School Field Trips: Key Findings from the Past and Implications for the Future , 2008 .

[29]  A. Pillay,et al.  Sustainability Study on Heavy Metal Uptake in Neem Biodiesel Using Selective Catalytic Preparation and Hyphenated Mass Spectrometry , 2014 .

[30]  Kirsten Ellenbogen,et al.  Free-choice science education: How we learn science outside of school , 2003 .

[31]  Jim Gallacher,et al.  Recognising and Accrediting Informal and Non‐formal Learning in Higher Education: an analysis of the issues emerging from a study of France and Scotland , 2003 .

[32]  Ingo Eilks,et al.  An example of learning about plastics and their evaluation as a contribution to Education for Sustainable Development in secondary school chemistry teaching , 2012 .

[33]  Hannu Salmi,et al.  Science centres as learning laboratories: experiences of Heureka, the Finnish Science Centre , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[34]  I. Eilks,et al.  Linking Formal and Non-Formal Learning in Science Education – A Reflection from Two Cases in Ireland and Germany , 2014 .

[35]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Relevant chemistry education : from theory to practice , 2015 .

[36]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  The measurement of students' attitudes towards scientific field trips , 1991 .

[37]  J. Wellington Formal and informal learning in science: the role of the interactive science centres , 1990 .

[38]  J. Last Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[39]  Robert M. Deiters Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). , 1968 .

[40]  Francisco J. Espinosa-García,et al.  Does Biodiesel from Jatropha Curcas Represent a Sustainable Alternative Energy Source , 2009 .

[41]  Ingo Eilks,et al.  Research-based development of a lesson plan on shower gels and musk fragrances following a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching , 2010 .

[42]  I. Eilks TEACHING BIODIESEL: A SOCIOCRITICAL AND PROBLEMORIENTED APPROACH TO CHEMISTRY TEACHING AND STUDENTS FIRST VIEWS ON IT , 2002 .

[43]  Jack Holbrook,et al.  Meeting Challenges to Sustainable Development through Science and Technology Education. , 2009 .

[44]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Research on Science Laboratory Activities: In Pursuit of Better Questions and Answers to Improve Learning , 1990 .

[45]  Dennis W. Sunal,et al.  Assessing Inquiry Potential: A Tool For Curriculum Decision Makers , 1980 .

[46]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment , 1994 .

[47]  P. Anastas,et al.  Green Chemistry , 2018, Environmental Science.

[48]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  Learning Science Outside of School , 2014 .

[49]  L. Tibell,et al.  Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment , 2003 .

[50]  Rachel Mamlok-Naaman,et al.  Developing students' ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories , 2005 .

[51]  E. Wagner,et al.  How Green Is your Fuel? Creation and Comparison of Automotive Biofuels , 2010 .

[52]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  High-school chemistry teaching through environmentally oriented curricula , 2012 .

[53]  Janette Griffin Learning to learn in informal science settings , 1994 .

[54]  Janette Griffin,et al.  Research on Students and Museums: Looking More Closely at the Students in School Groups , 2004 .

[55]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom , 2011 .

[56]  G. Haan,et al.  The BLK "21" Programme In Germany: A "Gestaltungskompetenz"-Based Model For Education For Sustainable Development. , 2006 .

[57]  M. Hasselhorn,et al.  Training in Decision-making Strategies: An approach to enhance students’ competence to deal with socio-scientific issues , 2013 .

[58]  Doug Knapp,et al.  An Elementary School Environmental Education Field Trip: Long-Term Effects on Ecological and Environmental Knowledge and Attitude Development , 2007 .

[59]  Ingo Eilks,et al.  "Learning at Stations" in Secondary Level Chemistry Lessons. , 2002 .

[60]  P. Mayring Qualitative Content Analysis , 2000 .

[61]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Learning In and From Science Laboratories , 2012 .

[62]  I. Eilks,et al.  Teaching the Societal Dimension of Chemistry Using a Socio-Critical and Problem-Oriented Lesson Plan Based on Bioethanol Usage , 2011 .

[63]  Ingo Eilks,et al.  Promoting Scientific Literacy Using a Sociocritical and Problem-Oriented Approach to Chemistry Teaching: Concept, Examples, Experiences. , 2009 .

[64]  P. Walters The Limits of Growth , 2000 .

[65]  Rachel Mamlok-Naaman,et al.  The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum , 2013 .