Comparison of different methods for the detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolyzates of spruce

This study describes different detoxification methods to improve both cell growth and ethanol production by Baker's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A dilute-acid hydrolyzate of spruce was used for the all detoxification methods tested. The changes in the concentrations of fermentable sugars and three groups of inhibitory compounds—aliphatic acids, furan derivatives, and phenolic compounds—were determined and the fermentability of the detoxified hydrolyzate was assayed. The applied detoxification methods included: treatment with alkali (sodium hydroxide or calcium hydroxide); treatment with sulfite (0.1% [w/v] or 1% [w/v] at pH 5.5 or 10); evaporation of 10% or 90% of the initial volume; anion exchange (at pH 5.5 or 10); enzymatic detoxification with the phenoloxidase laccase; and detoxification with the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei. An ion exchange at pH 5.5 or 10, treatment with laccase, treatment with calcium hydroxide, and treatment with T. reesei were the most efficient detoxification methods. Evaporation of 10% of the initial volume and treatment with 0.1% sulfite were the least efficient detoxification methods. Treatment with laccase was the only detoxification method that specifically removed only one group of the inhibitors, namely phenolic compounds. Anion exchange at pH 10 was the most efficient method for removing all three major groups of inhibitory compounds; however, it also resulted in loss of fermentable sugars.

[1]  B. Hahn-Hägerdal,et al.  Detoxification of wood hydrolysates with laccase and peroxidase from the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor , 1998, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[2]  W. A. Scheffers,et al.  Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. , 1990, Journal of general microbiology.

[3]  Guido Zacchi,et al.  Cost Analysis of Ethanol Production from Willow Using Recombinant Escherichia coli , 1994, Biotechnology progress.

[4]  Y. Y. Lee,et al.  Ethanol fermentation of crude acid hydrolyzate of cellulose using high‐level yeast inocula , 1985, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  T. Jeffries,et al.  An improvement in Pichia stipitis fermentation of acid-hydrolysed hemicellulose achieved by overliming (calcium hydroxide treatment) and strain adaptation , 1996, World journal of microbiology & biotechnology.

[6]  H. Graham Stabilization of the Prussian blue color in the determination of polyphenols , 1992 .

[7]  G. Zacchi,et al.  The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood , 1999 .

[8]  Bernard A. Prior,et al.  Production of ethanol from sugar cane bagasse hemicellulose hydrolyzate byPichia stipitis , 1988 .

[9]  L. Olsson,et al.  Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production. , 1996 .

[10]  Guido Zacchi,et al.  Simultaneous detoxification and enzyme production of hemicellulose hydrolysates obtained after steam pretreatment , 1997 .

[11]  José Manuel Domínguez,et al.  Improved xylitol production with Debaryomyces hansenii Y-7426 from raw or detoxified wood hydrolysates , 1997 .

[12]  Mats Galbe,et al.  Comparison of SO2 and H2SO4 impregnation of softwood prior to steam pretreatment on ethanol production , 1998 .

[13]  Mats Galbe,et al.  The effect of water-soluble inhibitors from steam-pretreated willow on enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation , 1996 .

[14]  G. J. Hajny,et al.  Fermentation of wood sugars to ethyl alcohol , 1945 .

[15]  G. Villa,et al.  Microbial transformation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol by saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1992 .

[16]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Characterization and fermentation of dilute-acid hydrolyzates from wood , 1997 .

[17]  W. A. Scheffers,et al.  Energetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. , 1990, Journal of general microbiology.

[18]  Jerome F. Saeman,et al.  Kinetics of Wood Saccharification - Hydrolysis of Cellulose and Decomposition of Sugars in Dilute Acid at High Temperature , 1945 .

[19]  Isamu Arai,et al.  Identification of aromatic monomers in steam-exploded poplar and their influences on ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1986 .

[20]  H. Blanch,et al.  By‐product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1983, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[21]  J. Russell,et al.  Another explanation for the toxicity of fermentation acids at low pH: anion accumulation versus uncoupling , 1992 .

[22]  G. Zacchi,et al.  Kinetics of ethanol production by recombinant Escherichia coli KO11 , 1995, Biotechnology and bioengineering.