Clustering of dark matter tracers: Renormalizing the bias parameters

A commonly used perturbative method for computing large-scale clustering of tracers of mass density, like galaxies, is to model the tracer density field as a Taylor series in the local smoothed mass density fluctuations, possibly adding a stochastic component. I suggest a set of parameter redefinitions, eliminating problematic perturbative correction terms, that should represent a modest improvement, at least, to this method. As presented here, my method can be used to compute the power spectrum and bispectrum to 4th order in initial density perturbations, and higher order extensions should be straightforward. While the model is technically unchanged at this order, just reparametrized, the renormalized model is more elegant, and should have better convergence behavior, for three reasons: First, in the usual approach the effects of beyond-linear-order bias parameters can be seen at asymptotically large scales, while after renormalization the linear model is preserved in the large-scale limit, i.e., the effects of higher order bias parameters are restricted to relatively high k. Second, while the standard approach includes smoothing to suppress large perturbative correction terms, resulting in dependence on the arbitrary cutoff scale, no cutoff-sensitive terms appear explicitly after my redefinitions (and, relatedly, my correction terms are less sensitive to high-k,more » nonlinear, power). Third, the 3rd order bias parameter disappears entirely, so my model has one fewer free parameter than usual (this parameter was redundant at the order considered). This model predicts no significant modification of the baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) signal, in real space, supporting the robustness of BAO as a probe of dark energy, and providing a complete perturbative description over the relevant range of scales.« less

[1]  The luminosity‐weighted or ‘marked’ correlation function , 2005, astro-ph/0512463.

[2]  J. Frieman,et al.  Nonlinear Evolution of the Bispectrum of Cosmological Perturbations , 1997, astro-ph/9704075.

[3]  Masahiro Takada,et al.  Baryon oscillations and dark‐energy constraints from imaging surveys , 2004 .

[4]  A. Szalay,et al.  Fourier Phase Analysis of SDSS Galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0506194.

[5]  Time evolution of the stochastic linear bias of interacting galaxies on linear scales , 2004, astro-ph/0409435.

[6]  O. Lahav,et al.  The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: The bias of galaxies and the density of the Universe , 2001, astro-ph/0112161.

[7]  R. Nichol,et al.  The 3D power spectrum of galaxies from the SDSS , 2003, astro-ph/0310725.

[8]  L. Amendola,et al.  Constraints on perfect fluid and scalar field dark energy models from future redshift surveys , 2004, astro-ph/0404599.

[9]  D. Weinberg,et al.  Constraints on the Effects of Locally Biased Galaxy Formation , 1997, astro-ph/9712192.

[10]  C. Blake,et al.  Measuring the cosmic evolution of dark energy with baryonic oscillations in the galaxy power spectrum , 2005, astro-ph/0505608.

[11]  The Time evolution of bias , 1998, astro-ph/9804067.

[12]  C. Baugh,et al.  Statistical analysis of galaxy surveys – II. The three-point galaxy correlation function measured from the 2dFGRS , 2005 .

[13]  The non-linear redshift-space power spectrum of galaxies , 1998, astro-ph/9808016.

[14]  E. Gaztañaga,et al.  Biasing and hierarchical statistics in large-scale structure , 1993, astro-ph/9302009.

[15]  Cosmological and astrophysical parameters from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey flux power spectrum and hydrodynamical simulations of the Lyman α forest , 2005, astro-ph/0508177.

[16]  U. Seljak,et al.  A Line of sight integration approach to cosmic microwave background anisotropies , 1996, astro-ph/9603033.

[17]  Cosmological parameters from CMB measurements and the final 2dFGRS power spectrum , 2005, astro-ph/0507583.

[18]  S. Colombi,et al.  Large scale structure of the universe and cosmological perturbation theory , 2001, astro-ph/0112551.

[19]  M. Crocce,et al.  Renormalized cosmological perturbation theory , 2006 .

[20]  J. Fry,et al.  The Galaxy correlation hierarchy in perturbation theory , 1984 .

[21]  R. Nichol,et al.  The Three-Dimensional Power Spectrum of Galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2003, astro-ph/0310725.

[22]  Stochastic Biasing and Weakly Nonlinear Evolution of Power Spectrum , 1999, astro-ph/9909124.

[23]  W. Percival,et al.  Cosmological parameters from cosmic microwave background measurements and the final 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey power spectrum , 2006 .

[24]  E. Vishniac Why weakly non-linear effects are small in a zero-pressure cosmology , 1983 .

[25]  Sarah Bridle,et al.  Cosmology with photometric redshift surveys , 2004 .

[26]  J. R. Bond,et al.  Cosmic background radiation anisotropies in universes dominated by nonbaryonic dark matter , 1984 .

[27]  Correlation Function in Deep Redshift Space as a Cosmological Probe , 2004, astro-ph/0408349.

[28]  R. Juszkiewicz On the evolution of cosmological adiabatic perturbations in the weakly non-linear regime , 1981 .

[29]  Wayne Hu,et al.  Baryonic Features in the Matter Transfer Function , 1997, astro-ph/9709112.

[30]  M. Crocce,et al.  Memory of initial conditions in gravitational clustering , 2006 .

[31]  I. Szapudi,et al.  The monopole moment of the three-point correlation function of the two-degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey , 2005, astro-ph/0505422.

[32]  S. Rey,et al.  Coupling of Modes of Cosmological Mass Density Fluctuations , 1986 .

[33]  Hee-Jong SeoDaniel J. Eisenstein Probing Dark Energy with Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations from Future Large Galaxy Redshift Surveys , 2003 .

[34]  Asantha Cooray,et al.  Measuring Angular Diameter Distances through Halo Clustering , 2001, astro-ph/0105061.

[35]  The three-point function in large-scale structure: redshift distortions and galaxy bias , 2005, astro-ph/0501637.

[36]  Loop Corrections in Nonlinear Cosmological Perturbation Theory. II. Two-Point Statistics and Self-Similarity , 1996, astro-ph/9602070.

[37]  The Alcock-Paczyński test in redshifted 21-cm maps , 2004, astro-ph/0410420.

[38]  J. Frieman,et al.  The Three-Point Function as a Probe of Models for Large-Scale Structure , 1993, astro-ph/9306018.

[39]  Second-Order Power Spectrum and Nonlinear Evolution at High Redshift , 1993, astro-ph/9311070.

[40]  J. Brinkmann,et al.  The Linear Theory Power Spectrum from the Lyα Forest in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2004, astro-ph/0407377.

[41]  Roman Scoccimarro Redshift-space distortions, pairwise velocities and nonlinearities , 2004 .

[42]  Eric V. Linder Baryon oscillations as a cosmological probe , 2003 .

[43]  P. Mcdonald,et al.  Large-Scale Correlation of Mass and Galaxies with the Lyα Forest Transmitted Flux , 2001, astro-ph/0112476.

[44]  R. Nichol,et al.  Universal fitting formulae for baryon oscillation surveys , 2005, astro-ph/0510239.

[45]  P. Mcdonald Toward a Measurement of the Cosmological Geometry at z ~ 2: Predicting Lyα Forest Correlation in Three Dimensions and the Potential of Future Data Sets , 2001, astro-ph/0108064.

[46]  R. Mandelbaum,et al.  Precision cosmology from the Lyman α forest: power spectrum and bispectrum , 2003, astro-ph/0302112.

[47]  Eiichiro Komatsu,et al.  Perturbation Theory Reloaded: Analytical Calculation of Nonlinearity in Baryonic Oscillations in the Real-Space Matter Power Spectrum , 2006 .

[48]  J. Frieman,et al.  Constraints on galaxy bias, matter density, and primordial non-Gaussianity from the PSCz galaxy redshift survey. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[49]  Avishai Dekel,et al.  Stochastic Nonlinear Galaxy Biasing , 1998, astro-ph/9806193.