Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Quantitative research is designed to test well-specified hypotheses, determine whether an intervention did more harm than good, and find out how much a risk factor predisposes persons to disease. Equally important, qualitative research offers insight into emotional and experiential phenomena in health care to determine what, how, and why. There are 4 essential aspects of qualitative analysis. First, the participant selection must be well reasoned and their inclusion must be relevant to the research question. Second, the data collection methods must be appropriate for the research objectives and setting. Third, the data collection process, which includes field observation, interviews, and document analysis, must be comprehensive enough to support rich and robust descriptions of the observed events. Fourth, the data must be appropriately analyzed and the findings adequately corroborated by using multiple sources of information, more than 1 investigator to collect and analyze the raw data, member checking to establish whether the participants' viewpoints were adequately interpreted, or by comparison with existing social science theories. Qualitative studies offer an alternative when insight into the research is not well established or when conventional theories seem inadequate. JAMA. 2000;284:357-362

[1]  K C Stange,et al.  Integrating qualitative and quantitative research methods. , 1989, Family medicine.

[2]  M. Patton,et al.  Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. , 1999, Health services research.

[3]  J. Smith Quantitative Versus Qualitative Research: An Attempt to Clarify the Issue , 1983 .

[4]  P. Rosenfield,et al.  The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[5]  Janice M. Morse,et al.  Is Qualitative Research Complete? , 1996 .

[6]  V. Tilden,et al.  Decisions about life-sustaining treatment. Impact of physicians' behaviors on the family. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  D L Streiner,et al.  Reconcilable Differences: The Marriage of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods , 1996, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[8]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[9]  S. Sofaer Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them? , 1999, Health services research.

[10]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[11]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[12]  I. Hodder The Interpretation of Documents and Material Culture , 1994 .

[13]  I. Holloway,et al.  Ethical Issues in Qualitative Nursing Research , 1995, Nursing ethics.

[14]  H. Waitzkin,et al.  On Studying the Discourse of Medical Encounters: A Critique of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods and a Proposal for Reasonable Compromise , 1990, Medical care.

[15]  R. Frankel,et al.  Limitation of Medical Care: An Ethnographic Analysis , 1993, The Journal of Clinical Ethics.

[16]  J. Kitzinger,et al.  Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups , 1995 .

[17]  P Vineis,et al.  Medicine, practice and guidelines: the uneasy juncture of science and art. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  J. Kirk,et al.  Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 1985 .

[19]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .