The Strength of Numbers

This paper investigates four different inclusion strategies used to recruit women to computer science: achieving a critical mass, educational reform, redefining the gendered symbolism of computer science and changing the content of the discipline. The relationship between and the relative importance of these four strategies are explored by looking at the extensive and successful Women and Computing Initiative (WCI) that was run by the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), starting in 1996, to recruit and retain more women in computer science. The findings suggest that a direct effort to increase the relative number of women is the most important strategy. While raising the number of women recruited seems to affect the symbolic perception of computer science, this effect is difficult to achieve through attempts to directly change the symbolic image of the discipline. In addition, a substantial increase in the number of women appears to cause an improvement in their learning environment, probably because minority problems such as too much visibility and unwanted attention became less prominent.

[1]  Flis Henwood,et al.  Engineering Difference: Discourses on gender, sexuality and work in a college of technology , 1998 .

[2]  Knut H. Sørensen,et al.  Genderization of Technology among Norwegian Engineering Students , 1987 .

[3]  Knut Holtan Sørensen,et al.  Towards a Feminized Technology? Gendered Values in the Construction of Technology , 1992 .

[4]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Athena Unbound: Acknowledgements , 2000 .

[5]  Minna Salminen-Karlsson,et al.  Bringing Women into Computer Engineering: Curriculum Reform Processes at Two Institutes of Technology. Linkoping Studies in Education and Psychology Dissertations, No. 60. , 1999 .

[6]  W. Faulkner.  Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering , 2000 .

[7]  J Mcgrath Cohoon,et al.  Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors , 2002, SGCS.

[8]  Mary Anne Devanna.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[9]  Teri Perl,et al.  Priming the pipeline , 2002, SGCS.

[10]  S. Harding.  Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives , 1993 .

[11]  What impact, if any, has feminism had on science? , 2004, Journal of Biosciences.

[12]  Jane L. Lehr,et al.  Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology , 2001 .

[13]  Londa Schiebinger,et al.  Nature's Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science , 1993 .

[14]  Donley T. Studlar,et al.  Does a critical mass exist? A comparative analysis of women's legislative representation since 1950 , 2002 .

[15]  Pamela Oliver,et al.  Whatever Happened to Critical Mass Theory? A Retrospective and Assessment* , 2001 .

[16]  S. Clegg,et al.  Gender and Computing: Not the same old problem , 2000 .

[17]  Pat Mueller,et al.  Doing it the Hard Way. , 1975 .

[18]  J. Wajcman.  Feminism Confronts Technology , 1991 .

[19]  Eric S. Roberts,et al.  Encouraging women in computer science , 2002, SGCS.

[20]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  The second self: computers and the human spirit , 1984 .

[21]  Allan Fisher,et al.  Unlocking the Clubhouse : Women in Computing by Allan Fisher , 2015 .

[22]  Bente Rasmussen,et al.  Men, Women and Data Systems , 1989 .

[23]  Sarah Plumeridge,et al.  Women Taking Positions Within Computer Science , 1998 .

[24]  D. Smith,et al.  Doing It the Hard Way: Investigations of Gender and Technology , 1990 .

[25]  S. Harding.  The science question in feminism , 1986 .

[26]  Helen E. Longino,et al.  Body, Bias, and Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of Reasoning in Two Areas of Biological Science , 1983, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[27]  Catherine J. Weinberger.  Just ask! Why surveyed women did not pursue IT courses or careers , 2004, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[28]  Paula Gabbert,et al.  Support communities for women in computing , 2002, SGCS.

[29]  F. Wilson.  Can Compute, Won't Compute: Women's Participation in the Culture of Computing , 2003 .

[30]  I. Vernersson.  Open University Press , 2000 .

[31]  Suzanne K. Damarin,et al.  The second self: Computers and the human spirit , 1985 .

[32]  Lorraine Code,et al.  Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking From Women’s Lives , 1994 .

[33]  Gerald Holton,et al.  Who Succeeds in Science: The Gender Dimension , 1995 .

[34]  Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change , 1983 .

[35]  Catherine Cronin,et al.  Theorizing Progress: Women in Science, Engineering, and Technology in Higher Education , 1999 .

[36]  Doris L. Carver,et al.  Shortchanging the future of information technology: the untapped resource , 2002, SGCS.

[37]  Tracy Camp,et al.  The incredible shrinking pipeline , 1997, CACM.

[38]  Susan M. Haller,et al.  Deterrents to women taking computer science courses , 2004, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[39]  Cynthia Cockburn,et al.  Machinery of dominance : women, men, and technical know-how , 1992 .

[40]  Bente Rasmussen,et al.  Excluding women from the technologies of the future , 1991 .

[41]  Ruth Woodfield,et al.  Women, Work and Computing20023Women, Work and Computing. Cambridge University Press, 2000. 209 pp., ISBN: ISBN: 0 521 77735 6 (pbk, £12.95); ISBN: 0 521 77189 7 (hbk, £35). , 2002 .

[42]  Gloria Childress Townsend,et al.  People who make a difference: mentors and role models , 2002, SGCS.

[43]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology , 2000 .

[44]  Ruth Hubbard,et al.  The politics of women's biology , 1990 .

[45]  Manju K. Ahuja.  Women in the information technology profession: a literature review, synthesis and research agenda , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Violet B. Haas,et al.  Women in Scientific and Engineering Professions. , 1986 .