Celiac Disease Diagnosis in Misdiagnosed Children

Antiendomysial antibodies (EMA) are today considered the most sensitive and specific serological marker of celiac disease (CD). The aim of the present study was to assess the occurrence of EMA of IgG isotype in EMA IgA negative children with clinical suspicion of malabsorption and their relationship with CD. Serum EMA IgG1 determination was performed on 30 EMA IgA negative children with clinical suspicion of CD. Total serum IgA levels were further investigated. Sixty children with gastroenterological diseases other than CD were used as control disease patients and 63 healthy children were evaluated as the control group. Eighteen out of 30 children in the study showed EMA IgG1 positivity in sera and a villous height/crypt depth ratio <3:1 as index of intestinal atrophy. It is noticeable that a selective IgA deficiency was present in only 9 of 18 EMA IgG1 positive children. In addition, clinical symptoms, EMA IgG1, and mucosal atrophy disappeared after 8–10 mo on a gluten-free diet. Neither EMA IgA nor EMA IgG1 were detected in the children in the control groups. The other 12 children in study group showed no histologic abnormalities and were EMA IgG1 negative. In this study, we reveal a group of EMA IgG1 CD children without IgA deficiency. The diagnosis was based on the presence of gluten-dependent typical serological and histologic features of CD. Our data suggest that EMA IgG1 determination could be a new tool in the diagnostic workup of CD, useful in avoiding possible misdiagnosis.

[1]  I. Korponay-Szabó,et al.  High prevalence of silent celiac disease in preschool children screened with IgA/IgG antiendomysium antibodies. , 1999, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[2]  M. Mäki,et al.  Coeliac disease , 1997, The Lancet.

[3]  S. Musumeci,et al.  Antibody pattern in childhood celiac disease. , 1997, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[4]  M. Mazzilli,et al.  Gluten-sensitive disease with mild enteropathy. , 1996, Gastroenterology.

[5]  M. Mazzilli,et al.  Definition of the initial immunologic modifications upon in vitro gliadin challenge in the small intestine of celiac patients. , 1996, Gastroenterology.

[6]  M. Greco,et al.  Use of a threshold serum level of anti-gliadin antibodies improves diagnostic efficiency of the test in adult coeliac disease but is unreliable as a screening test. , 1996, The Italian journal of gastroenterology.

[7]  H. Kirchner,et al.  Subclass typing of IgG paraproteins by immunofixation electrophoresis. , 1995, Clinical chemistry.

[8]  G. Corrao,et al.  Serological screening of coeliac disease: choosing the optimal procedure according to various prevalence values. , 1994, Gut.

[9]  C. Catassi,et al.  Coeliac disease in the year 2000: exploring the iceberg , 1994, The Lancet.

[10]  M. Clark,et al.  Endomysial antibody: is it the best screening test for coeliac disease? , 1992, Gut.

[11]  J. Walker-Smith Management of infantile gastroenteritis. , 1990, Archives of disease in childhood.

[12]  S. Guandalini,et al.  Revised criteria for diagnosis of coeliac disease , 1990 .

[13]  E. Beutner,et al.  Endomysial antibodies in the diagnosis of celiac disease and the effect of gluten on antibody titers. , 1989, Immunological investigations.