Influence of seasonal variation on bioassessment of streams using macroinvertebrates

The EU Water Framework Directive requires assessment of the ecological quality of running waters using macroinvertebrates. One of the problems of obtaining representative samples of organisms from streams is the choice of sampling date, as the scores obtained from macroinvertebrate indices vary naturally between seasons, confounding the detection of anthropogenic environmental change. We investigated this problem in a 4th order calcareous stream in the western Carpathian Mountains of central Europe, the Stupavský potok brook. We divided our 100 m study site into two stretches and took two replicate samples every other month alternately from each stretch for a period of 1 year, sampling in the months of February, April, June, August, October and December. Multivariate analysis of the macroinvertebrate communities (PCA) clearly separated the samples into three groups: (1) April samples (2) June and August samples (3) October, December and February samples. Metric scores were classified into two groups those that were stable with respect to sampling month, and those that varied. Of the metrics whose values increase with amount of allochthonous organic material (ALPHA_MESO, hyporhithral, littoral, PASF, GSI new, DSI, CSI), the highest scores occurred in February, April, October and December, while for metrics whose values decrease with content of organic material (DSII, DIS, GFI D05, PORI, RETI, hypocrenal, metarhithral, RP, AKA, LITHAL, SHRED, HAI) the highest values occurred in February, April, June and December. We conclude that sampling twice a year, in early spring and late autumn, is appropriate for this type of metarhithral mountain stream. Sampling in summer is less reliable due to strong seasonal influences on many of the metrics examined while sampling in winter is inappropriate for logistical reasons.

[1]  Petr Šmilauer,et al.  CANOCO 4.5 Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination , 2002 .

[2]  D. Williams,et al.  The occurrence of benthos deep in the substratum of a stream , 1974 .

[3]  H. Clifford.  Descriptive phenology and seasonality of a Canadian brown-water stream , 1978, Hydrobiologia.

[4]  Il’ja Krno,et al.  Influence of seasonal variation on bioassessment of streams using macroinvertebrates , 2006 .

[5]  Richard K. Johnson,et al.  Detection of organic pollution of streams in southern Sweden using benthic macroinvertebrates , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[6]  B. Chessman,et al.  Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: the role of experience, and comparisons with quantitative methods , 2003, Hydrobiologia.

[7]  S. Ormerod,et al.  The influences of habitat and seasonal sampling regimes on the ordination and classification of macroinvertebrate assemblages in the catchment of the River Wye, Wales , 1987, Hydrobiologia.

[8]  N. Williams,et al.  Microdistribution and feeding of the net-spinning caddisflies (Trichoptera) of a Canadian stream , 1973 .

[9]  S. Bunn.  Spatial and temporal variation in the macroinvertebrate fauna of streams of the northern Jarrah forest, Western Australia functional organization , 1986 .

[10]  D. Williams,et al.  Migrations and Distributions of Stream Benthos , 1981 .

[11]  B. C. Cowell,et al.  Seasonal changes in the distribution and abundance of benthic invertebrates in six headwater streams in central Florida , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[12]  B. Kerans,et al.  Aquatic Invertebrate Assemblages: Spatial and Temporal Differences among Sampling Protocols , 1992, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[13]  M. Graça,et al.  The effects of a basic effluent on macroinvertebrate community structure in a temporary Mediterranean river. , 1996, Environmental pollution.

[14]  Paulo Pinto,et al.  Assessment of temporary streams: the robustness of metric and multimetric indices under different hydrological conditions , 2004 .

[15]  J. Wright,et al.  The influence of seasonal and taxonomic factors on the ordination and classification of running‐water sites in Great Britain and on the prediction of their macro‐invertebrate communities , 1984 .

[16]  A. Schmidt‐Kloiber,et al.  The effect of excluding taxa with low abundances or taxa with small distribution ranges on ecological assessment , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[17]  Leonard Sandin,et al.  Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system , 2004, Hydrobiologia.