An interaction-based approach to detecting highly interactive Twitter communities using tweeting links

The immense popularity and rapid growth of Online Social Networks (OSN) have attracted the interest of researchers and companies, particularly in how users group together to form communities online. While many community detection algo- rithms have been developed to detect communities on such OSNs, most of these algorithms are based only on topological links and researchers have observed that many topological links do not translate to actual user interaction. As such, many members of the detected communities do not communicate frequently to each other. This inactivity creates a problem in targeted adver- tising and viral marketing, which require the community to be highly active so as to facilitate the diffusion of product/service information. We propose an approach to detect highly interactive Twitter communities that share common interests, based on the frequency and patterns of direct tweeting among users, rather than the topological information implicit in follower/following links. Our experimental results show that communities detected by our proposed approach are more cohesive and connected within different interest groups, based on topological measures. We also show that the detected communities actively interact about the specific interests, based on the high frequency of #hashtags and @mentions related to this interest. In addition, we study the trends in their tweeting patterns such as how they follow and unfollow other users, and observe that our approach detects communities comprising users whose links are more persistent compared to those in other groups of users.

[1]  Hawoong Jeong,et al.  Comparison of online social relations in volume vs interaction: a case study of cyworld , 2008, IMC '08.

[2]  Tuan-Anh Hoang,et al.  Modeling User Interest and Community Interest in Microbloggings: An Integrated Approach , 2015, PAKDD.

[3]  Hila Becker,et al.  Beyond Trending Topics: Real-World Event Identification on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[4]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  User interactions in social networks and their implications , 2009, EuroSys '09.

[5]  Scott Counts,et al.  Predicting the Speed, Scale, and Range of Information Diffusion in Twitter , 2010, ICWSM.

[6]  Juan-Zi Li,et al.  Understanding retweeting behaviors in social networks , 2010, CIKM.

[7]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Characterizing social cascades in flickr , 2008, WOSN '08.

[8]  Kwan Hui Lim,et al.  A Seed-Centric Community Detection Algorithm based on an Expanding Ring Search , 2013, AWC.

[9]  Haewoon Kwak,et al.  Fragile online relationship: a first look at unfollow dynamics in twitter , 2011, CHI.

[10]  Bo Xu,et al.  Structures of broken ties: exploring unfollow behavior on twitter , 2013, CSCW.

[11]  Feng Luo,et al.  Exploring Local Community Structures in Large Networks , 2006, 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2006 Main Conference Proceedings)(WI'06).

[12]  Jun Ota,et al.  Activity-based topic discovery , 2014, Web Intell. Agent Syst..

[13]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[14]  Kwan Hui Lim,et al.  Interest classification of Twitter users using Wikipedia , 2013, OpenSym.

[15]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook , 2009, WOSN '09.

[16]  Kwan Hui Lim,et al.  Tweets Beget Propinquity: Detecting Highly Interactive Communities on Twitter Using Tweeting Links , 2012, 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[17]  Wolfgang Kellerer,et al.  Outtweeting the Twitterers - Predicting Information Cascades in Microblogs , 2010, WOSN.

[18]  Emanuele Pianta,et al.  Revising the Wordnet Domains Hierarchy: semantics, coverage and balancing , 2004 .

[19]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Two hearts in three-quarter time: How to waltz the social media/viral marketing dance , 2011 .

[20]  Matthew Michelson,et al.  Tweet Disambiguate Entities Retrieve Folksonomy SubTree Step 1 : Discover Categories Generate Topic Profile from SubTrees Step 2 : Discover Profile Topic Profile : “ English Football ” “ World Cup ” , 2011 .

[21]  Martin Rosvall,et al.  Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Wei-keng Liao,et al.  User-Interest based Community Extraction in Social Networks , 2012, KDD 2012.

[23]  Ee-Peng Lim,et al.  Of Information Systems School of Information Systems 11-2014 On Joint Modeling of Topical Communities and Personal Interest in Microblogs , 2017 .

[24]  Ashish Sureka,et al.  iTop: interaction based topic centric community discovery on twitter , 2012, PIKM '12.

[25]  Bin Wu,et al.  Community detection in large-scale social networks , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[26]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Twitter Sentiment Analysis: The Good the Bad and the OMG! , 2011, ICWSM.

[27]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[28]  J. M. Villas-Boas,et al.  The Targeting of Advertising , 2005 .

[29]  Narsingh Deo,et al.  Discovering communities in complex networks , 2006, ACM-SE 44.

[30]  Dongsheng Wang,et al.  Domain classification for celebrities using spreading activation and reasoning on semantic network , 2013, 2013 Fifth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN).

[31]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[32]  Efthimis N. Efthimiadis,et al.  Conversational tagging in twitter , 2010, HT '10.

[33]  Kwan Hui Lim,et al.  A Topological Approach for Detecting Twitter Communities with Common Interests , 2012, MSM/MUSE.

[34]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[35]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Clique percolation in random networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[36]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Information credibility on twitter , 2011, WWW.

[37]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter , 2011, WWW.

[38]  Haewoon Kwak,et al.  More of a Receiver Than a Giver: Why Do People Unfollow in Twitter? , 2012, ICWSM.

[39]  Andrew C. Thomas,et al.  Beyond Mere Following: Mention Network, a Better Alternative for Researching User Interaction and Behavior , 2015, SBP.