The resurrection of Tweedledum and Tweedledee: Bimodality cannot distinguish serial and parallel processes

Simultaneously presented signals may be processed in serial or in parallel. One potentially valuable indicator of a system’s characteristics may be the appearance of multimodality in the response time (RT) distributions. It is known that standard serial models can predict multimodal RT distributions, but it is unknown whether multimodality is diagnostic of serial systems, or whether alternative architectures, such as parallel ones, can also make such predictions. We demonstrate via simulations that a multimodal RT distribution is not sufficient by itself to rule out parallel self-terminating processing, even with limited trial numbers. These predictions are discussed within the context of recent data indicating the existence of multimodal distributions in visual search.

[1]  G Kendall Maurice,et al.  The Advanced Theory Of Statistics Vol-i , 1943 .

[2]  R. Fisher The Advanced Theory of Statistics , 1943, Nature.

[3]  H. Egeth Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination , 1966 .

[4]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Processing time as influenced by the number of elements in a visual display , 1969 .

[5]  J. Townsend SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .

[6]  J. Townsend Serial and within-stage independent parallel model equivalence on the minimum completion time ☆ , 1976 .

[7]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A stochastic theory of matching processes , 1976 .

[8]  Richard Schweickert,et al.  A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task , 1978 .

[9]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[10]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decomposing the reaction time distribution: Pure insertion and selective influence revisited☆ , 1980 .

[11]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[13]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Uncovering mental processes with factorial experiments , 1984 .

[14]  G R Grice,et al.  Absence of a redundant-signals effect in a reaction time task with divided attention , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  J. Hartigan,et al.  The Dip Test of Unimodality , 1985 .

[16]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  M J Farah,et al.  Mechanisms of imagery-perception interaction. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A trichotomy: Interactions of factors prolonging sequential and concurrent mental processes in stochastic discrete mental (PERT) networks , 1989 .

[19]  J. Townsend Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[20]  Hans Colonius,et al.  The “horse race” random utility model for choice probabilities and reaction times, and its competing risks interpretation , 1992 .

[21]  A. Treisman Spreading suppression or feature integration? A reply to Duncan and Humphreys (1992). , 1992 .

[22]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[23]  J. Townsend,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories , 1995 .

[24]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Decompositions of response times: an almost general theory , 1995 .

[25]  T. Zandt,et al.  Time-dependent Poisson counter models of response latency in simple judgment. , 2000, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[26]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[27]  B McElree,et al.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Termination of a visual search with large display size effects. , 2004, Spatial vision.

[29]  J. Townsend,et al.  The serial-parallel dilemma: A case study in a linkage of theory and method , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  The attentional field has a Mexican hat distribution , 2005, Vision Research.

[31]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  K. Schneider,et al.  Attention biases decisions but does not alter appearance. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[33]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: attention alters appearance. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[35]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Converging measures of workload capacity , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[37]  J. Townsend,et al.  Workload capacity spaces: A unified methodology for response time measures of efficiency as workload is varied , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  K. Schneider Attention alters decision criteria but not appearance: a reanalysis of Anton-Erxleben, Abrams, and Carrasco (2010). , 2011, Journal of vision.

[39]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Visual Search as a Combination of Automatic and Attentive Processes , 2011, CogSci.

[40]  Ami Eidels,et al.  Independent race of colour and word can predict the Stroop effect , 2012 .

[41]  Rick Dale,et al.  Assessing bimodality to detect the presence of a dual cognitive process , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[42]  J. Townsend,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology , 2015 .

[43]  M. Manosevitz High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , .