The resurrection of Tweedledum and Tweedledee: Bimodality cannot distinguish serial and parallel processes
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G Kendall Maurice,et al. The Advanced Theory Of Statistics Vol-i , 1943 .
[2] R. Fisher. The Advanced Theory of Statistics , 1943, Nature.
[3] H. Egeth. Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination , 1966 .
[4] R. Atkinson,et al. Processing time as influenced by the number of elements in a visual display , 1969 .
[5] J. Townsend. SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .
[6] J. Townsend. Serial and within-stage independent parallel model equivalence on the minimum completion time ☆ , 1976 .
[7] James T. Townsend,et al. A stochastic theory of matching processes , 1976 .
[8] Richard Schweickert,et al. A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task , 1978 .
[9] Roger Ratcliff,et al. A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .
[10] J. Townsend,et al. Decomposing the reaction time distribution: Pure insertion and selective influence revisited☆ , 1980 .
[11] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[12] James T. Townsend,et al. The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .
[13] James T. Townsend,et al. Uncovering mental processes with factorial experiments , 1984 .
[14] G R Grice,et al. Absence of a redundant-signals effect in a reaction time task with divided attention , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.
[15] J. Hartigan,et al. The Dip Test of Unimodality , 1985 .
[16] A. Treisman. Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[17] M J Farah,et al. Mechanisms of imagery-perception interaction. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[18] James T. Townsend,et al. A trichotomy: Interactions of factors prolonging sequential and concurrent mental processes in stochastic discrete mental (PERT) networks , 1989 .
[19] J. Townsend. Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .
[20] Hans Colonius,et al. The “horse race” random utility model for choice probabilities and reaction times, and its competing risks interpretation , 1992 .
[21] A. Treisman. Spreading suppression or feature integration? A reply to Duncan and Humphreys (1992). , 1992 .
[22] J. Townsend,et al. Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.
[23] J. Townsend,et al. Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories , 1995 .
[24] Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al. Decompositions of response times: an almost general theory , 1995 .
[25] T. Zandt,et al. Time-dependent Poisson counter models of response latency in simple judgment. , 2000, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.
[26] James L. McClelland,et al. The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.
[27] B McElree,et al. Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[28] Denis Cousineau,et al. Termination of a visual search with large display size effects. , 2004, Spatial vision.
[29] J. Townsend,et al. The serial-parallel dilemma: A case study in a linkage of theory and method , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[30] A. Kleinschmidt,et al. The attentional field has a Mexican hat distribution , 2005, Vision Research.
[31] John K. Tsotsos,et al. Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[32] K. Schneider,et al. Attention biases decisions but does not alter appearance. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[33] Scott D. Brown,et al. The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.
[34] M. Carrasco,et al. Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: attention alters appearance. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[35] Andrew Heathcote,et al. Converging measures of workload capacity , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[36] M. Carrasco. Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.
[37] J. Townsend,et al. Workload capacity spaces: A unified methodology for response time measures of efficiency as workload is varied , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[38] K. Schneider. Attention alters decision criteria but not appearance: a reanalysis of Anton-Erxleben, Abrams, and Carrasco (2010). , 2011, Journal of vision.
[39] Richard M. Shiffrin,et al. Visual Search as a Combination of Automatic and Attentive Processes , 2011, CogSci.
[40] Ami Eidels,et al. Independent race of colour and word can predict the Stroop effect , 2012 .
[41] Rick Dale,et al. Assessing bimodality to detect the presence of a dual cognitive process , 2013, Behavior research methods.
[42] J. Townsend,et al. The Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology , 2015 .