Screening for domestic violence in an oncology clinic: barriers and potential solutions.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To evaluate the implementation of a domestic violence screening protocol in an oncology clinic. DESIGN A retrospective review of a random sample of clinic medical records and qualitative surveys of nursing staff. SETTING A gynecologic oncology clinic in a large teaching hospital. SAMPLE 204 charts were abstracted and six oncology nurses completed surveys. METHODS A random sample of patients from clinic appointment schedules was selected 6 and 12 months after the implementation of a domestic violence screening protocol. A brief written survey of nursing staff also was conducted. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES Documentation of domestic violence screening, barriers to screening and documentation, and potential solutions to the barriers. FINDINGS Sixty-three percent of the charts reviewed had a domestic violence screening record present, but only 12% of the charts with a screening record had documentation. Patients with domestic violence screening documentation were more likely to have had five or more clinic visits during the study period. The most frequent barriers to protocol implementation cited by nursing staff were forgetting to screen or document domestic violence screening. Nursing staff recommended adding domestic violence screening questions to forms and providing reminders to screen. CONCLUSIONS Several barriers to successful implementation of a domestic violence screening protocol in a gynecologic oncology clinic, including documentation issues, were encountered. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Nurses interested in implementing a domestic violence screening protocol in their oncology clinic should consider reviewing the barriers to domestic violence screening and documentation and the potential solutions identified in this study.

[1]  G. Ryan,et al.  Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence in eighteen U.S. states/territories, 2005. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[2]  P. Friedmann,et al.  Barriers to screening for domestic violence , 2002, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[3]  J. Mick Identifying signs and symptoms of intimate partner violence in an oncology setting. , 2006, Clinical journal of oncology nursing.

[4]  J. Weissman,et al.  Barriers to repeat mammography: cultural perspectives of African‐American, Asian, and Hispanic women , 2006, Psycho-oncology.

[5]  H. Cottrill,et al.  Adverse Impact of a History of Violence for Women With Breast, Cervical, Endometrial, or Ovarian Cancer , 2006, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  J. Stewart,et al.  Domestic violence against women with cancer: examples and review of the literature. , 2006, The journal of supportive oncology.

[7]  Susannah L. Rose,et al.  Cancer patients and domestic violence: providing safety and support. , 2006, The journal of supportive oncology.

[8]  A. Balar,et al.  Delay in treatment of invasive cervical cancer due to intimate partner violence. , 2005, Gynecologic oncology.

[9]  S. Plichta Intimate Partner Violence and Physical Health Consequences , 2004, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[10]  N. Elder,et al.  Medical Management of Intimate Partner Violence Considering the Stages of Change: Precontemplation and Contemplation , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[11]  A. Taket,et al.  Routinely asking women about domestic violence in health settings , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  J. Coid,et al.  Domestic violence affects women more than men , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  S. Weiss,et al.  Intimate Partner Violence from the Emergency Medicine Perspective , 2002, Women & health.

[14]  J. Hathaway,et al.  Listening to Survivors' Voices , 2002 .

[15]  Judy L. Postmus,et al.  Cumulative abuse experiences, physical health and health behaviors. , 2002, Annals of epidemiology.

[16]  G. Chávez,et al.  Female victims of intimate partner physical domestic violence (IPP-DV), California 1998. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[17]  P. Salber,et al.  Barriers to screening for intimate partner violence: time to reframe the question. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[18]  A. Coker,et al.  Intimate partner violence and cervical neoplasia. , 2000, Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine.

[19]  J. Silverman,et al.  Health status and health care use of Massachusetts women reporting partner abuse. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  G. Shakhar,et al.  Evidence that stress and surgical interventions promote tumor development by suppressing natural killer cell activity , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[21]  M. Sherman,et al.  Soluble interleukin 2 receptor levels and cervical neoplasia: results from a population-based case-control study in Costa Rica. , 1999, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[22]  E J Lawson,et al.  A narrative analysis: a black woman's perceptions of breast cancer risks and early breast cancer detection. , 1998, Cancer nursing.

[23]  D. Richter,et al.  Childhood Forced Sex and Cervical Dysplasia Among Women Prison Inmates , 1998 .

[24]  Rural health-care providers' attitudes, practices, and training experience regarding intimate partner violence--West Virginia, March 1997. , 1998, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[25]  J. Berzofsky,et al.  Immune activation in cervical neoplasia: cross-sectional association between plasma soluble interleukin 2 receptor levels and disease. , 1997, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[26]  R. Dickson,et al.  Stress influence on development of hepatocellular tumors in transgenic mice overexpressing TGF alpha. , 1995, Acta oncologica.

[27]  Position statement on physical violence against women. , 1992, The American nurse.