Perceptual Graph Model Systems

Theoretical structures are developed to account for the impact of emotion and perception in strategic conflict. In particular, the possibility principle facilitates modeling the effects of emotions on future scenarios contemplated by decision makers, while perceptual graph models and the associated graph model system permit the decision makers to experience and view the conflict independently. These new theoretical advances expand current modeling capabilities, thereby furnishing realistic, descriptive models without exacting too great a cost in modeling complexity. Specifically, these developments enhance the applicability of the modeling algorithms within the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution to real-world disputes by integrating emotion and perception, common ingredients in almost all conflicts. To demonstrate that the new developments are practical, an illustrative application to a real-world conflict is presented.

[1]  Joseph E. LeDoux,et al.  Cognitive–emotional interactions: Listen to the brain. , 2000 .

[2]  P. Bennett,et al.  Toward a theory of hypergames , 1977 .

[3]  Antonio Damasio,et al.  The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[4]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Emotion: the missing ingredient in conflict analysis , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[5]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Modeling misperceptions in games , 1988 .

[6]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Conflict analysis: models and resolutions , 1984 .

[8]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  TURBULENCE IN MIRAMICHI BAY: THE BURNT CHURCH CONFLICT OVER NATIVE FISHING RIGHTS1 , 2006 .

[9]  D. Lutz,et al.  Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior , 1973 .

[10]  K. Hipel,et al.  The Role of Emotions in Envisioning Outcomes in Conflict Analysis , 2005 .

[11]  A. Damasio Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York (Grosset/Putnam) 1994. , 1994 .

[12]  Tom Gilb,et al.  Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 1994 .

[13]  G. Fricchione Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[14]  Nigel Howard,et al.  Manifesto for a Theory of Drama and Irrational Choice , 1993 .

[15]  Charles Leake Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 1993 .

[16]  T. Jones,et al.  Mediating with Heart in Mind: Addressing Emotion in Mediation Practice , 2001 .

[17]  Luis G. Vargas Conflict analysis: Models and resolutions: Niall M. FRASER and Keith W. HIPEL Volume 11 in: North-Holland Series in System Science and Engineering, North-Holland, New York, 1984, xx + 377 pages, $34.50 , 1985 .

[18]  Takehiro Inohara,et al.  Interperceptional equilibrium as a generalization of Nash equilibrium in games with interperception , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[19]  A. Damasio Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. avon books , 1994 .

[20]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Perception and Emotion in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[21]  Peter G. Bennett,et al.  Hypergames: Developing a model of conflict☆ , 1980 .