Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Shaughnessy,et al. An Interview with Jaime A. Teixeira Da Silva: Insight into Improving the Efficiency of the Publication Process , 2017 .
[2] Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers? , 2018, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[3] Malhar N. Kumar. Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review , 2014 .
[4] J. Evans,et al. Plagiarism in submitted manuscripts: incidence, characteristics and optimization of screening—case study in a major specialty medical journal , 2016, Research Integrity and Peer Review.
[5] Gautam Naik,et al. Peer-review activists push psychology journals towards open data , 2017, Nature.
[6] J. A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. Excessively Long Editorial Decisions and Excessively Long Publication Times by Journals: Causes, Risks, Consequences, and Proposed Solutions , 2017 .
[7] S. Mertens,et al. Standards in the face of uncertainty--peer review is flawed and under-researched, but the best we have. , 2012, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.
[8] Daniel N. Jones. Predatory Personalities as Behavioral Mimics and Parasites , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[9] Christina K. Pikas,et al. A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review , 2017, F1000Research.
[10] S. Eriksson,et al. Plagiarism in research , 2014, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.
[11] Valentine Cawley,et al. An Analysis of the Ethics of Peer Review and Other Traditional Academic Publishing Practices , 2011 .
[12] Debora Weber-Wulff,et al. Plagiarism Detection Software: Promises, Pitfalls, and Practices , 2016 .
[13] C. N. Stewart. Peer Review and The Ethics of Privileged Information , 2011 .
[14] R. Spier. On dealing with bias , 2002, Science and engineering ethics.
[15] Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. Clarivate Analytics: Continued Omnia vanitas Impact Factor Culture , 2018, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[16] Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior , 2017, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[17] Sara Schroter,et al. Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey , 2006, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
[18] George W. Rainbolt. The concept of rights , 2006 .
[19] Mariam B. Sticklen,et al. Plant genetic engineering for biofuel production: towards affordable cellulosic ethanol , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[20] A. Nederhof. Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. , 1985 .
[21] Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections , 2018, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[22] Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. How are Editors Selected, Recruited and Approved? , 2017, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[23] J. A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. Negative results: negative perceptions limit their potential for increasing reproducibility , 2015, Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine.
[24] Kendall Powell,et al. Does it take too long to publish research? , 2016, Nature.
[25] Bo-Christer Björk,et al. Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada , 2016, PeerJ.
[26] J. A. T. Silva. The Militarization of Science, and Subsequent Criminalization of Scientists , 2016 .
[27] Jatinder Singh,et al. Committee on publication ethics , 2010, Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics.
[28] Rustam Al-Shahi Salman,et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management , 2014, The Lancet.
[29] Jelte M. Wicherts,et al. Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals , 2016, PloS one.
[30] P. Keith,et al. Congruence Between Panel and Recall Data in Longitudinal Research , 1978 .
[31] Wei Hong,et al. For Money or Glory? Commercialization, Competition, and Secrecy in the Entrepreneurial University , 2009 .
[32] Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. What Rights Do Authors Have? , 2017, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[33] J. A. T. Silva,et al. Threats to the Survival of the Author-Pays-Journal to Publish Model , 2017 .
[34] Tony Ross-Hellauer,et al. What is open peer review? A systematic review. , 2017, F1000Research.
[35] Henk F. Moed,et al. Citation-based metrics are appropriate tools in journal assessment provided that they are accurate and used in an informed way , 2012, Scientometrics.
[36] J. A. T. Silva. COPE Requires Greater Consistency and Accountability , 2017 .
[37] D. Parrish,et al. US legal principles and confidentiality of the peer review process. , 2002, JAMA.
[38] Chad Ambrose. Plagiarism of ideas. Benjamin Rush and Charles Caldwell--a student-mentor dispute. , 2014, The Pharos of Alpha Omega Alpha-Honor Medical Society. Alpha Omega Alpha.
[39] Tinker Ready. Plagiarize or perish? , 2006, Nature Medicine.
[40] Raymond E Spier,et al. Peer review and innovation , 2002, Science and engineering ethics.
[41] Michael Dansinger,et al. Dear Plagiarist: A Letter to a Peer Reviewer Who Stole and Published Our Manuscript as His Own , 2017, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[42] Yang Peng,et al. Retraction: Controllable Electrochemical Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles on Indium-Tin-Oxide-Coated Glass , 2015 .
[43] Gaute Wangen,et al. Conflicting Incentives Risk Analysis: A Case Study of the Normative Peer Review Process , 2015 .
[44] Melissa S. Anderson,et al. The problem of plagiarism. , 2011, Urologic oncology.
[45] Michael Willis,et al. Why do peer reviewers decline to review manuscripts? A study of reviewer invitation responses , 2016, Learn. Publ..
[46] Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. CiteScore: A cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric? , 2017, Scientometrics.
[47] Z. U. Khan,et al. Potentiality of Neem (Azadirachta indica) Powder in Rheology Modification of Oil-in-Water Emulsion , 2015 .
[48] Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. Debunking Post-Publication Peer Review , 2015 .
[49] Teixeira da Silva,et al. Fake peer reviews, fake identities, fake accounts, fake data: beware! , 2017 .
[50] Lisa Newington,et al. Factors influencing recruitment to research: qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of research teams , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[51] V. Katavic,et al. Free editors and peers: squeezing the lemon dry , 2016 .
[52] David L. Roberts,et al. Estimating the prevalence of researcher misconduct: a study of UK academics within biological sciences , 2014, PeerJ.
[53] Allen Clark,et al. Journal editing: Managing the peer review process for timely publication of articles , 2000 .
[54] Richard Smith,et al. Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.
[55] David B. Resnik,et al. Perceptions of Ethical Problems with Scientific Journal Peer Review: An Exploratory Study , 2008, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[56] Mathieu Bouville,et al. Plagiarism: Words and Ideas , 2008, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[57] Brian D. Crawford. Open Access Initiative , 2014 .
[58] J. A. T. Silva,et al. Editorial Responsibilities: Both Sides of the Coin , 2016 .
[59] Ingo Scholtes,et al. Quantifying the effect of editor–author relations on manuscript handling times , 2017, Scientometrics.
[60] Judit Dobránszki,et al. Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review , 2015, Accountability in research.
[61] Claudia Keser,et al. Can We Manage Trust? , 2005, iTrust.
[62] Judit Dobránszki,et al. Potential Dangers with Open Access Data Files in the Expanding Open Data Movement , 2015 .
[63] J. A. T. Silva. The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal. , 2017 .
[64] Anton Oleinik,et al. Conflict(s) of Interest in Peer Review: Its Origins and Possible Solutions , 2013, Science and Engineering Ethics.
[65] C. Finelli,et al. The improvement of large High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) particle levels, and presumably HDL metabolism, depend on effects of low-carbohydrate diet and weight loss , 2016, EXCLI journal.
[66] David B. Resnik,et al. Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors , 2015, Science and Engineering Ethics.