How Can We Make Progress with Decision Support Systems in Landscape and River Basin Management? Lessons Learned from a Comparative Analysis of Four Different Decision Support Systems

This article analyses the benefits and shortcomings of the recently developed decision support systems (DSS) FLUMAGIS, Elbe-DSS, CatchMODS, and MedAction. The analysis elaborates on the following aspects: (i) application area/decision problem, (ii) stakeholder interaction/users involved, (iii) structure of DSS/model structure, (iv) usage of the DSS, and finally (v) most important shortcomings. On the basis of this analysis, we formulate four criteria that we consider essential for the successful use of DSS in landscape and river basin management. The criteria relate to (i) system quality, (ii) user support and user training, (iii) perceived usefulness and (iv) user satisfaction. We can show that the availability of tools and technologies for DSS in landscape and river basin management is good to excellent. However, our investigations indicate that several problems have to be tackled. First of all, data availability and homogenisation, uncertainty analysis and uncertainty propagation and problems with model integration require further attention. Furthermore, the appropriate and methodological stakeholder interaction and the definition of ‘what end-users really need and want’ have been documented as general shortcomings of all four examples of DSS. Thus, we propose an iterative development process that enables social learning of the different groups involved in the development process, because it is easier to design a DSS for a group of stakeholders who actively participate in an iterative process. We also identify two important lines of further development in DSS: the use of interactive visualization tools and the methodology of optimization to inform scenario elaboration and evaluate trade-offs among environmental measures and management alternatives.

[1]  Lachlan T. H. Newham,et al.  Stakeholder participation in modelling for integrated catchment assessment and management: An Australian case study , 2007 .

[2]  B. Croke,et al.  Suspended sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations and exports during storm-events to the Tuross estuary, Australia. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  Michael Matthies,et al.  System analysis of water quality management for the Elbe river basin , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[4]  Hedwig van Delden,et al.  Using the GEONAMICA® software environment for integrated dynamic spatial modelling , 2008 .

[5]  Jürgen Ihringer,et al.  Statistical analysis of the flood situation and assessment of the impact of diking measures along the Elbe (Labe) river , 2002 .

[6]  Ruud van der Helm Challenging futures studies to enhance EU’s participatory river basin management , 2003 .

[7]  J. Rominger,et al.  Modeling the fate of down-the-drain chemicals in rivers: An improved software for GREAT-ER , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Measuring organizational IS effectiveness: an overview and update of senior management perspectives , 2002, DATB.

[9]  Frank van Kouwen,et al.  A framework for linking advanced simulation models with interactive cognitive maps , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  Klaus Fraedrich,et al.  Applying Non-Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Algorithms to Climate Classification: Some Problems and their Solution , 1999 .

[11]  E. Gaddis,et al.  Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: A perspective from modeling practitioners , 2008 .

[12]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Optimizing landscape configuration to enhance habitat suitability for species with contrasting habitat requirements , 2006 .

[13]  Axel Bronstert,et al.  Modelling river discharge for large drainage basins: from lumped to distributed approach , 1999 .

[14]  Kasper Kok,et al.  Combining Two Approaches of Integrated Scenario Development to Combat Desertification in the Guadalentín Watershed, Spain , 2009 .

[15]  Ibtissem Tounsi-Guérin Understanding the natural and anthropogenic causes of soil degradation and desertification in the mediterranean basin by remote sensing data , 1997 .

[16]  Andrew A. Lovett,et al.  Developing scenarios and visualisations to illustrate potential policy and climatic influences on future agricultural landscapes , 2006 .

[17]  Enrique G. Zapatero,et al.  A quality assessment instrument for multi‐criteria decision support software , 1996 .

[18]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[19]  Jens Mödinger,et al.  Ansätze für eine nachhaltige Grundwasserbewirtschaftung und -nutzung im Rhein-Neckar-Raum bei konkurrierenden Interessen , 2004 .

[20]  R. Derwent,et al.  Late lessons from early warnings: the Precautionary Principle 1896–2000 , 2002 .

[21]  Jörg Dietrich,et al.  Socioeconomic analysis within an interdisciplinary spatial decision support system for an integrated management of the Werra River Basin , 2005 .

[22]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Decision support systems and intelligent systems , 1997 .

[23]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Scenario analysis and management options for sustainable river basin management: Application of the Elbe DSS , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[24]  Norio Okada,et al.  Managing Surface Water Contamination in Nagoya, Japan: An Integrated Water Basin Management Decision Framework , 2006 .

[25]  P. Jeffrey,et al.  On the Design of Computer-Based Models for Integrated Environmental Science , 2005, Environmental management.

[26]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Decision Support Systems for implementing the European Water Framework Directive: The MULINO approach , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[27]  Chris Moran,et al.  Constructing River Basin Sediment Budgets for the National Land and Water Resources Audit . , 2001 .

[28]  H. Vacik,et al.  Evaluating sustainable forest management strategies with the Analytic Network Process in a Pressure-State-Response framework. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Evaluating cost-effectiveness of conservation management actions in an agricultural landscape on a regional scale , 2007 .

[30]  Friedrich-Wilhelm Gerstengarbe,et al.  A method to estimate the statistical confidence of cluster separation , 1997 .

[31]  Martin Volk,et al.  Integrated ecological-economic modelling of water pollution abatement management options in the Upper Ems River Basin , 2008 .

[32]  Brian S. McIntosh,et al.  A review of the factors which influence the use and usefulness of information systems , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[33]  Karin Frank,et al.  Land Use Options - Strategies and Adaptation to Global Change , 2009 .

[34]  Robbie Price,et al.  Choosing Regional Futures: Challenges and choices in building integrated models to support long‐term regional planning in New Zealand* , 2008 .

[35]  Martin Volk,et al.  Towards the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive?: Lessons learned from water quality simulations in an agricultural watershed , 2009 .

[36]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[37]  Alexey Voinov,et al.  Optimization methodology for land use patterns : evaluation based on multiscale habitat pattern comparison , 2003 .

[38]  Yan Huang,et al.  Appropriate modeling for integrated flood risk assessment , 2005 .

[39]  Martin Volk,et al.  A SDSS-based Ecological-economic Modelling Approach for Integrated River Basin Management on Different Scale Levels – The Project FLUMAGIS , 2007 .

[40]  Hans-Georg Frede,et al.  Agricultural nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium balances in Germany : Methodology and trends 1970 to 1995 , 1998 .

[41]  G. Tress,et al.  Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning—a study from Denmark , 2003 .

[42]  Jörg Jacobs,et al.  Land use scenario development and stakeholder involvement as tools for watershed management within the Havel River Basin , 2005 .

[43]  T. Lynch,et al.  Success and failure of decision support systems: Learning as we go , 2000 .

[44]  F. Burstein,et al.  Handbook on Decision Support Systems 1 , 2008 .

[45]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  A framework for integrated hydrologic, sediment and nutrient export modelling for catchment-scale management , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[46]  Werner Kleinhanß,et al.  Modellgestützte Folgenabschätzung zu den Auswirkungen der Agenda 2000 auf die deutsche Landwirtschaft , 1999 .

[47]  R. Aspinall,et al.  A Knowledge-Based Systems Approach to Design of Spatial Decision Support Systems for Environmental Management , 1998, Environmental management.

[48]  José G. Borges,et al.  Decision Support Systems in Forest Management , 2008 .

[49]  Harald Vacik,et al.  Application of a spatial decision support system in managing the protection forests of Vienna for sustained yield of water resources. , 2001 .

[50]  Pieter W. G. Bots,et al.  Designing a power tool for policy analysts: dynamic actor network analysis , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[51]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Use of Models to Support the Monitoring Requirements in the Water Framework Directive , 2007 .

[52]  M Matthies,et al.  Georeferenced regional simulation and aquatic exposure assessment. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[53]  Caspar J. M. Hewett,et al.  A multi-scale framework for strategic management of diffuse pollution , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[54]  P. Gourbesville Integrated river basin management, ICT and DSS: Challenges and needs , 2008 .

[55]  A. Jakeman,et al.  Computation of the instantaneous unit hydrograph and identifiable component flows with application to two small upland catchments , 1990 .

[56]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[57]  D. H. Walker,et al.  Decision support, learning and rural resource management , 2002 .

[58]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Opening up Decision Making: The View from the Black Stool , 1995 .

[59]  Robert M. Argent,et al.  A new approach to water quality modelling and environmental decision support systems , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[60]  Justyna Czemiel Berndtsson,et al.  Influence of different activities on water quality in a small basin , 2006 .

[61]  Philip Paar,et al.  Towards a planning support system for environmental management and agri-environmental measures--the Colorfields study. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[62]  J. Kros,et al.  Towards integrated national modelling with particular reference to the environmental effects of nutrients , 1998 .

[63]  H. G. Wind,et al.  From Design to Application of a Decision-support System for Integrated River-basin Management , 2009 .

[64]  Frank A. Ward,et al.  INTEGRATED RIVER BASIN OPTIMIZATION: MODELING ECONOMIC AND HYDROLOGIC INTERDEPENDENCE' , 1996 .

[65]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 , 2011 .

[66]  Tim Oxley,et al.  Integrated modelling and decision-support tools: a Mediterranean example , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[67]  João Rocha,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool "SWAT" , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[68]  Christian Stock,et al.  Using virtual environments and agent models in multi-criteria decision-making , 2009 .

[69]  Mike Kirkby,et al.  Towards a modelling framework for integrated assessment in arid and semi-arid regions , 2009 .

[70]  Guy Engelen,et al.  Cellular Automata as the Basis of Integrated Dynamic Regional Modelling , 1997 .

[71]  Frieder Haakh,et al.  Multikriterielle Optimierung der Grundwasserbewirtschaftung — dargestellt am Beispiel des Wassergewinnungsgebiets Donauried , 2004 .

[72]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Why are spatial decision support systems not used? Some experiences from the Netherlands , 2003, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[73]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Decision Support Systems for water resources management: current state and guidelines for tool development , 2011 .

[74]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Environmental decision support systems: Current issues, methods and tools , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[75]  Michael Matthies,et al.  Integration of MONERIS and GREAT-ER in the decision support system for the German Elbe river basin , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[76]  Hedwig van Delden,et al.  Integration of multi-scale dynamic spatial models of socio-economic and physical processes for river basin management , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[77]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  Uncertainty and precaution in environmental management: Insights from the UPEM conference , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[78]  Alexey Voinov,et al.  Optimization methodology for land use patterns using spatially explicit landscape models , 2002 .

[79]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Progress in integrated assessment and modelling , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..

[80]  Rolf Färe,et al.  A hybrid genetic algorithm for multiobjective problems with activity analysis-based local search , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[81]  David E. Rosenberg,et al.  Hydro-economic models: concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. , 2009 .