Evaluating the effect of image preprocessing on an information-theoretic CAD system in mammography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES In our earlier studies, we reported an evidence-based computer-assisted decision (CAD) system for location-specific interrogation of mammograms. A content-based image retrieval framework with information theoretic (IT) similarity measures serves as the foundation for this system. Specifically, the normalized mutual information (NMI) was shown to be the most effective similarity measure for reduction of false-positive marks generated by other prescreening mass detection schemes. The objective of this work was to investigate the importance of image filtering as a possible preprocessing step in our IT-CAD system. MATERIALS AND METHODS Different filters were applied, each one aiming to compensate for known limitations of the NMI similarity measure. The study was based on a region-of-interest database that included true masses and false-positive regions from digitized mammograms. RESULTS Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analysis showed that IT-CAD is affected slightly by image filtering. Modest, yet statistically significant, performance gain was observed with median filtering (overall ROC area index A(z) improved from 0.78 to 0.82). However, Gabor filtering improved performance for the high-sensitivity portion of the ROC curve where a typical false-positive reduction scheme should operate (partial ROC area index (0.90)A(z) improved from 0.33 to 0.37). Fusion of IT-CAD decisions from different filtering schemes markedly improved performance (A(z) = 0.90 and (0.90)A(z) = 0.55). At 95% sensitivity, the system's specificity improved by 36.6%. CONCLUSIONS Additional improvement in false-positive reduction can be achieved by incorporating image filtering as a preprocessing step in our IT-CAD system.

[1]  N. Obuchowski Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. , 2003, Radiology.

[2]  Elizabeth A Krupinski,et al.  Computer-aided detection in clinical environment: benefits and challenges for radiologists. , 2004, Radiology.

[3]  Rene Vargas-Voracek,et al.  Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information. , 2003, Medical physics.

[4]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[5]  Georgia D. Tourassi,et al.  Stacked Generalization in Computer-Assisted Decision Systems: Empirical Comparison of Data Handling Schemes , 2007, 2007 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[6]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  A mammographic mass CAD system incorporating features from shape, fractal, and channelized Hotelling observer measurements: preliminary results , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  E. Conant,et al.  Factors affecting radiologist inconsistency in screening mammography. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[8]  Georgia D. Tourassi,et al.  Cross-digitizer robustness of a knowledge-based CAD system for mass detection in mammograms , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  P. Mayo,et al.  Comparing methods to denoise mammographic images , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Kaja Mohideen,et al.  Automatic Detection of Microcalcification in Mammograms– A Review , 2005 .

[11]  Debra M Ikeda,et al.  Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. , 2005, Radiology.

[12]  John G. Daugman,et al.  Complete discrete 2-D Gabor transforms by neural networks for image analysis and compression , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[13]  D H HUBEL,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  David M Catarious,et al.  Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system. , 2004, Medical physics.

[15]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  A computational vision approach to image registration , 1993, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Medical image processing and analysis , 2000 .

[17]  Luisa P. Wallace,et al.  Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  Chien-Chang Chen,et al.  Gabor transform in texture analysis , 1994, Other Conferences.

[19]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[21]  Richard L. Van Metter,et al.  Handbook of Medical Imaging , 2009 .

[22]  Richard H. Moore,et al.  Current Status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[23]  KathleenR. Brandt,et al.  Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection--prospective evaluation. , 2006, Radiology.

[24]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[26]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  Detection and Recognition of Simple Spatial Forms , 1983 .

[27]  Michael Brady,et al.  Mammographic Image Analysis , 1999, Computational Imaging and Vision.

[28]  Andrew C. Sleigh,et al.  Physical and Biological Processing of Images , 1983 .

[29]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  A new approach to image feature detection with applications , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[30]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis in Mammography , 2005 .

[31]  L. Tabár,et al.  Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[32]  D. Ikeda,et al.  Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. , 2001, Radiology.

[33]  C. Floyd,et al.  Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms. , 2006, Medical physics.

[34]  P Taylor,et al.  Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) devices. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[35]  C. Metz,et al.  A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests. , 1996, Radiology.

[36]  Jerry D. Gibson,et al.  Handbook of Image and Video Processing , 2000 .

[37]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  Carlo Tomasi,et al.  Perceptual metrics for image database navigation , 1999 .

[39]  Swatee Singh,et al.  Information-theoretic CAD system in mammography: entropy-based indexing for computational efficiency and robust performance. , 2007, Medical physics.

[40]  F. Hall,et al.  Breast imaging and computer-aided detection. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  M J Schell,et al.  Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[42]  D. Hill,et al.  Medical image registration , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  Rachel F Brem,et al.  Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[44]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  The Effect of Median Filtering on Edge Estimation and Detection , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[45]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Digital image processing using MATLAB , 2006 .

[46]  L. Tabár,et al.  Beyond randomized controlled trials , 2001, Cancer.

[47]  Jundong Liu,et al.  Local frequency representations for robust multimodal image registration , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[48]  Dennis Gabor,et al.  Theory of communication , 1946 .

[49]  Ulf Nyman,et al.  Nephrotoxicity after renal angiography using iodine and gadolinium contrast media in pigs with renal damage. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[50]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Evaluation of cost functions for gray value matching of two-dimensional images in radiotherapy. , 2003, Medical physics.