Effectiveness in social impact assessment: Aboriginal peoples and resource development in Australia

Definitions of and judgments regarding effectiveness in social impact assessment (SIA) depend on how the purposes of SIA are understood. They are defined differently by various interests that participate in, or are affected by, impact assessment processes, and the concept of ‘effectiveness’ and the issue of what is required to achieve it are both contested and contextual. This article reviews a number of different approaches to SIA and outlines what effectiveness might mean for each. It then considers, at two levels, what ‘effective SIA’ involves in the context of large-scale resource development on Aboriginal land in Australia. The first level involves control of SIA. For indigenous peoples who have historically been excluded from and ignored by SIAs undertaken as part of government approval processes, Aboriginal control is an essential prerequisite for ‘effective SIA’. However, control only creates the potential for effectiveness. The second level of analysis involves the practical activities that must be undertaken, and issues that must be addressed, to realize this potential. The author develops a matrix designed to help identify and manage these activities and issues in a systematic way.

[1]  Robert B. Gibson.  Sustainability assessment and conflict resolution: Reaching agreement to proceed with the Voisey's Bay nickel mine , 2006 .

[2]  C. Paci,et al.  Reconsidering the Canadian Environmental Impact Assessment Act , 2002 .

[3]  Donna Craig,et al.  Social impact assessment: Politically oriented approaches and applications , 1990 .

[4]  Christopher Wood,et al.  Public participation in environmental impact assessment—implementing the Aarhus Convention , 2005 .

[5]  T Kauppinen,et al.  The effectiveness of human impact assessment in the Finnish Healthy Cities Network. , 2006, Public health.

[6]  A. Chase,et al.  Anthropology and impact assessment: Development pressures and indigenous interests in Australia , 1990 .

[7]  P. Jacobs,et al.  Adapting environmental impact assessment to sustain the community development process , 1996 .

[8]  C. O’faircheallaigh.  Environmental agreements, EIA follow-up and aboriginal participation in environmental management: The Canadian experience , 2007 .

[9]  Thomas R. Berger,et al.  Northern frontier, northern homeland : the report of the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry , 1977 .

[10]  Assessing impacts on reservations: A failure of social impact research , 1986 .

[11]  M. Husain Sadar,et al.  Use of traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment of uranium mining in the Athabasca Saskatchewan , 1999 .

[12]  Robert Gramling,et al.  US principles and guidelines Principles and guidelines for social impact assessment in the USA The Interorganizational Committee on Principles and Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment , 2004 .

[13]  John Taylor.  Indigenous labour supply constraints in the West Kimberley , 2008 .

[14]  N. T. Yap,et al.  Contentious politics in environmental assessment: blocked projects and winning coalitions , 2008 .

[15]  Douglas C. Baker,et al.  Ambitious and restrictive scoping , 2001 .

[16]  Allan Dale,et al.  Sacred land, mineral wealth, and biodiversity at Coronation Hill, Northern Australia: indigenous knowledge and SIA , 2003 .

[17]  Richard Howitt,et al.  Social impact assessment and resource development: issues from the Australian experience , 1989 .

[18]  L. B. Lawe,et al.  Cumulative effects assessment and EIA follow-up: a proposed community-based monitoring program in the Oil Sands Region, northeastern Alberta , 2005 .

[19]  Alan Bond,et al.  The Contribution of Environmental Assessment to Sustainable Development: Toward a Richer Empirical Understanding , 2007, Environmental management.

[20]  Luca Del Furia,et al.  The effectiveness of provisions and quality of practices concerning public participation in EIA in Italy , 2000 .

[21]  Christiane Gagnon,et al.  Can SIA empower communities , 1993 .

[22]  J. Stewart,et al.  MEANINGFUL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM CANADIAN PARTICIPANTS, PROPONENTS, AND GOVERNMENT , 2007 .

[23]  C. Gagnon.  SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN QUÉBEC: ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT , 1995 .

[24]  Robert Chambers,et al.  Reversing the paradigm: quantification, participatory methods and pro-poor impact assessment , 2005 .

[25]  David P. Lawrence,et al.  The need for EIA theory-building , 1997 .

[26]  Christopher Wood,et al.  Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect , 2007 .

[27]  L. A. Sandham,et al.  A review of EIA report quality in the North West province of South Africa , 2008 .

[28]  Douglas Baker,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of British Columbia's environmental assessment process for first nations' participation in mining development , 2003 .

[29]  L. G. Smith,et al.  Impact Assessment and Sustainable Resource Management , 1993 .

[30]  Ilan Kapoor,et al.  Towards participatory environmental management? , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[31]  John Taylor.  Indigenous People in the West Kimberley Labour Market , 2006 .

[32]  Susan A. Joyce,et al.  Social Impact Assessment in the Mining Industry: Current Situation and Future Directions , 2002 .

[33]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  What is necessary to ensure natural justice in environmental impact assessment decision-making? , 2008 .

[34]  Helen Ross,et al.  Community social impact assessment: A framework for indigenous peoples , 1990 .

[35]  Cisca Joldersma,et al.  Methodology for participatory policy analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  R. A. Bodaly,et al.  Environmental and social impacts of large scale hydroelectric development: who is listening? , 1995 .

[37]  Saleem H. Ali,et al.  Extractive Industries, Environmental Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility , 2007 .

[38]  C. O’faircheallaigh.  Aborigines, mining companies and the state in contemporary Australia: A new political economy or ‘business as usual’? , 2006 .

[39]  R. Howitt.  Social Impact Assessment as ‘Applied Peoples' Geography’ , 1993 .

[40]  David Hickie,et al.  Development of guidelines for improving the effectiveness of environmental assessment , 1998 .

[41]  Ciaran S O'Faircheallaigh,et al.  Making Social Impact Assessment Count: A Negotiation-based Approach for Indigenous Peoples , 1999 .

[42]  K. Finsterbusch.  IN PRAISE OF SIA — A PERSONAL REVIEW OF THE FIELD OF SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FEASIBILITY, JUSTIFICATION, HISTORY, METHODS, ISSUES , 1995 .

[43]  Peter H. Fricke,et al.  Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment , 1995 .

[44]  Dm Rosenberg,et al.  Environmental and social impacts of large scale hydroelectric development: who is listening? , 1995 .

[45]  Edward W. Gondolf,et al.  Empowered native community, modified SIA: The case of hydaburg, alaska , 1986 .

[46]  Tracey Nitz,et al.  Does environmental impact assessment facilitate environmental management activities , 2000 .

[47]  Stewart Lockie,et al.  SIA in review: setting the agenda for impact assessment in the 21st century , 2001 .

[48]  D. P. Lawrence.  EIA — DO WE KNOW WHERE WE ARE GOING? , 1997 .

[49]  Alan Bond,et al.  The interminable issue of effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory , 2004 .

[50]  Marcus B. Lane,et al.  SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT , 1997 .

[51]  Meinhard Doelle,et al.  Time for a new approach to public participation in EA: Promoting cooperation and consensus for sustainability , 2006 .

[52]  Chris Tollefson,et al.  Cumulative environmental impacts and aboriginal rights , 1998 .

[53]  Jeanie Mckillop,et al.  LINKING PROJECT APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT: THE PERFORMANCE OF EIA IN LARGE-SCALE MINING PROJECTS , 1999 .

[54]  Matthew Asa Cashmore.  The contribution of environmental assessment to sustainable development , 2007 .