Motor Imagery to Enhance Recovery After Subcortical Stroke: Who Might Benefit, Daily Dose, and Potential Effects

Background. Motor imagery may enhance motor recovery after stroke. Objectives. To estimate the proportion of patients able to perform motor imagery, the feasibility of delivery of motor imagery training (MIT), and the effects of MIT on motor recovery in an exploratory study. Methods. An immediate pretreatment and posttreatment single-group design was used to study 10 patients after subcortical stroke with neuromuscular weakness in the upper limb. MIT that included upper limb activities reflecting everyday tasks was provided for 10 consecutive working days. Measures included assessment of chaotic motor imagery, patient report of tolerability of MIT, Motricity Index (MI), Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT), and quality of movement (MAL-QOM). MIT dose was changed in response to patient feedback. Graphed motor function scores were inspected visually for clinically important changes. Results. Four of the 10 patients were unable to perform motor imagery. Patient opinion was positive about the content and shaped daily dose of MIT given in two 20-minute periods separated by a 10-minute rest. Clinically important changes in motor scores were found. Four patients increased MI score (range 8-16), 3 patients increased 9HPT score (range 0.02-0.04 pegs/second), and 4 patients increased MAL-QOM score (range 0.63-1.29). Conclusions. MIT was received positively by patients, but 40% were unable to perform imagery and interindividual variations were found on motor function.

[1]  H. C. Dijkerman,et al.  Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[2]  Ruth Dickstein,et al.  Motor imagery practice in gait rehabilitation of chronic post-stroke hemiparesis: four case studies , 2006, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[3]  C. Braun,et al.  Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  J. Baron,et al.  Motor Imagery: A Backdoor to the Motor System After Stroke? , 2006, Stroke.

[5]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  A. Sirigu,et al.  The Mental Representation of Hand Movements After Parietal Cortex Damage , 1996, Science.

[7]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  Scott H. Johnson,et al.  Imagining the impossible: intact motor representations in hemiplegics , 2000, Neuroreport.

[9]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  E. Taub,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the Upper-Extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for Measuring Real-World Arm Use , 2005, Stroke.

[11]  A Berthoz,et al.  The role of inhibition in the hierarchical gating of executed and imagined movements. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  T. Kimberley,et al.  Neural Substrates for Motor Imagery in Severe Hemiparesis , 2006, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[13]  V. Pomeroy,et al.  Development of a Schedule of Current Physiotherapy Treatment Used to Improve Movement Control and Functional Use of the Lower Limb after Stroke: A Precursor to a Clinical Trial , 2005, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[14]  S. H. Johnson,et al.  Intact Motor Imagery in Chronic Upper Limb Hemiplegics: Evidence for Activity-Independent Action Representations , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Chetwyn C. H. Chan,et al.  Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  M. Jeannerod.  Mental imagery in the motor context , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  L Warner,et al.  Mental imagery and its potential for physical therapy. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[18]  S. Page,et al.  A randomized efficacy and feasibility study of imagery in acute stroke , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[19]  G. Demeurisse,et al.  Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. , 1980, European neurology.

[20]  A. Sirigu,et al.  Left and right hand recognition in upper limb amputees. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  L. Parsons,et al.  Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET , 1995, Nature.

[22]  William Z Rymer,et al.  The Effect of Motor Imagery on Spinal Segmental Excitability , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Bruce H Dobkin,et al.  Confounders in Rehabilitation Trials of Task-Oriented Training: Lessons From the Designs of the EXCITE and SCILT Multicenter Trials , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[24]  I. Hsueh,et al.  Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. , 1998, Age and ageing.

[25]  W. Weerdt.  Measuring recovery of arm-hand function in stroke patients: A comparison of the Brunnstrom-Fugl-Meyer test and the Action Research Arm test , 1985 .

[26]  D. Wade,et al.  Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. , 1992, Current opinion in neurology and neurosurgery.

[27]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Mental simulation of an action modulates the excitability of spinal reflex pathways in man. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  S. Page,et al.  Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.