The attentional ‘spotlight's’ penumbra: center-surround modulation in striate cortex

By enhancing neural activity in respective retinotopic cortical representations attention increases the efficiency with which visual information at a selected location is processed. Behavioral data also suggest that information from the vicinity of the attended region is actively suppressed. In search for a physiological correlate of this ‘spotlight's penumbra’ we assessed neural responses in retinotopic representations of an attended location and of locations at different distances to it. Relative to passive viewing we found suppressed striate activity for the nearby but not for the far locations. This attention-driven center-surround distribution of neural activity may enhance the contrast between attended and non-attended objects. We relate the different behavior of extrastriate areas to their lower spatial resolution, i.e. larger receptive fields.

[1]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[2]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Spatial selection via feature-driven inhibition of distractor locations , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  A. Dale,et al.  The Retinotopy of Visual Spatial Attention , 1998, Neuron.

[5]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Attentional interference at small spatial separations , 1999, Vision Research.

[6]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Dynamic Interaction of Object- and Space-Based Attention in Retinotopic Visual Areas , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Attentional suppression of activity in the human visual cortex , 2000, Neuroreport.

[8]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  The selective tuning model of attention: psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item , 2003, Vision Research.

[9]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Modulation of sensory suppression: implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Circuits for Local and Global Signal Integration in Primary Visual Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  G. Shulman,et al.  Gradients of spatial attention. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[12]  A. Shmuel,et al.  Sustained Negative BOLD, Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption Response and Its Coupling to the Positive Response in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[13]  J. R. Mounts,et al.  Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  N. Lavie.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Arno Villringer,et al.  A Physiological Correlate of the “Zoom Lens” of Visual Attention , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  D. Heeger,et al.  Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  D. Somers,et al.  Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  D. LaBerge.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  E. DeYoe,et al.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.