Privacy and coordination: computing on databases with endogenous participation

We propose a simple model where individuals in a privacy-sensitive population decide whether or not to participate in a pre-announced noisy computation by an analyst, so that the database itself is endogenously determined by individuals' participation choices. The privacy an agent receives depends both on the announced noise level, as well as how many agents choose to participate in the database. Each agent has some minimum privacy requirement, and decides whether or not to participate based on how her privacy requirement compares against her expectation of the privacy she will receive if she participates in the computation. This gives rise to a game amongst the agents, where each individual's privacy if she participates, and therefore her participation choice, depends on the choices of the rest of the population. We investigate symmetric Bayes-Nash equilibria, which in this game consist of threshold strategies, where all agents whose privacy requirements are weaker than a certain threshold participate and the remaining agents do not. We characterize these equilibria, which depend both on the noise announced by the analyst and the population size; present results on existence, uniqueness, and multiplicity; and discuss a number of surprising properties they display.

[1]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Pricing private data , 2012, Electron. Mark..

[2]  Aaron Roth,et al.  Mechanism design in large games: incentives and privacy , 2012, ITCS.

[3]  Stratis Ioannidis,et al.  Privacy Auctions for Recommender Systems , 2011, TEAC.

[4]  David Xiao,et al.  Is privacy compatible with truthfulness? , 2013, ITCS '13.

[5]  Dan Suciu,et al.  A theory of pricing private data , 2012, ICDT '13.

[6]  Stephen Chong,et al.  Truthful Mechanisms for Agents That Value Privacy , 2011, EC.

[7]  Joan Feigenbaum,et al.  Approximate Privacy: Foundations and Quantification , 2009, TALG.

[8]  Joan Feigenbaum,et al.  An Economic Analysis of User-Privacy Options in Ad-Supported Services , 2012, WINE.

[9]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  A Market for Unbiased Private Data: Paying Individuals According to Their Privacy Attitudes , 2012, First Monday.

[10]  Yu-Han Lyu,et al.  Approximately optimal auctions for selling privacy when costs are correlated with data , 2012, EC '12.

[11]  Sampath Kannan,et al.  The Exponential Mechanism for Social Welfare: Private, Truthful, and Nearly Optimal , 2012, 2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[12]  Aaron Roth,et al.  Conducting truthful surveys, cheaply , 2012, EC '12.

[13]  Aaron Roth,et al.  Take It or Leave It: Running a Survey When Privacy Comes at a Cost , 2012, WINE.

[14]  Kobbi Nissim,et al.  Privacy-aware mechanism design , 2011, EC '12.

[15]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Approximately optimal mechanism design via differential privacy , 2010, ITCS '12.

[16]  Stratis Ioannidis,et al.  Distributed rating prediction in user generated content streams , 2011, RecSys '11.

[17]  M. Dufwenberg Game theory. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[18]  Aaron Roth,et al.  Selling privacy at auction , 2010, EC '11.

[19]  Joan Feigenbaum,et al.  Approximate privacy: foundations and quantification (extended abstract) , 2010, EC '10.

[20]  J. Kleinberg,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets , 2010 .

[21]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Essentials of Game Theory: A Concise Multidisciplinary Introduction , 2008, Essentials of Game Theory: A Concise Multidisciplinary Introduction.

[22]  Felix Brandt,et al.  On the Existence of Unconditionally Privacy-Preserving Auction Protocols , 2008, TSEC.

[23]  Daniel A. Spielman,et al.  Spectral Graph Theory and its Applications , 2007, 48th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'07).

[24]  Kunal Talwar,et al.  Mechanism Design via Differential Privacy , 2007, 48th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'07).

[25]  Robert McClelland,et al.  SEQUENTIAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO PUBLIC GOODS , 2007 .

[26]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis , 2006, TCC.

[27]  Avanidhar Subrahmanyam,et al.  The Value of Private Information , 2005 .

[28]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Privacy-Preserving Datamining on Vertically Partitioned Databases , 2004, CRYPTO.

[29]  Irit Dinur,et al.  Revealing information while preserving privacy , 2003, PODS.

[30]  S. Stringer Economic Analysis , 2002, The Laryngoscope.

[31]  Moni Naor,et al.  Privacy preserving auctions and mechanism design , 1999, EC '99.

[32]  Kenneth C. Laudon,et al.  Markets and privacy , 1993, CACM.

[33]  Barton L. Lipman,et al.  Provision of Public Goods: Fully Implementing the Core through Private Contributions , 1989 .

[34]  P. Samuelson,et al.  Foundations of Economic Analysis. , 1948 .