A Blueprint for a Blockchain-Based Architecture to Power a Distributed Network of Tamper-Evident Learning Trace Repositories

The need to ensure privacy and data protection in educational contexts is driving a shift towards new ways of securing and managing learning records. Although there are platforms available to store educational activity traces outside of a central repository, no solution currently guarantees that these traces are authentic when they are retrieved for review. This paper presents a blueprint for an architecture that employs blockchain technology to sign and validate learning traces, allowing them to be stored in a distributed network of repositories without diminishing their authenticity. Our proposal puts participants in online learning activities at the center of the design process, granting them the option to store learning traces in a location of their choice. Using smart contracts, stakeholders can retrieve the data, securely share it with third parties and ensure it has not been tampered with, providing a more transparent and reliable source for learning analytics. Nonetheless, a preliminary evaluation found that only 56% of teachers surveyed considered tamper-evident storage a useful feature of a learning trace repository. These results motivate further examination with other end users, such as learning analytics researchers, who may have stricter expectations of authenticity for data used in their practice.

[1]  Zainudin Johari,et al.  THE BLOCKCHAIN REVOLUTION AND HIGHER EUCATION , 2017 .

[2]  John Domingue,et al.  The Blockchain and Kudos: A Distributed System for Educational Record, Reputation and Reward , 2016, EC-TEL.

[3]  Nikhil Swamy,et al.  Formal Verification of Smart Contracts: Short Paper , 2016, PLAS@CCS.

[4]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  Helping Teachers Align Learning Objectives and Evidence: Integration of ePortfolios in Distributed Learning Environments , 2015, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[5]  María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana,et al.  Learning analytics in small-scale teacher-led innovations: Ethical and data privacy issues , 2016 .

[6]  Andrew Lippman,et al.  MedRec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data Access and Permission Management , 2016, 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD).

[7]  Erik Duval,et al.  Towards Responsive Open Learning Environments: The ROLE Interoperability Framework , 2011, EC-TEL.

[8]  Erik Duval,et al.  Tracking Data in Open Learning Environments , 2015, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[9]  Helen C. Barrett,et al.  Balancing the Two Faces of ePortfolios , 2010 .

[10]  Satoshi Nakamoto Bitcoin : A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System , 2009 .

[11]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Innovating Pedagogy 2016 , 2016 .

[12]  Melanie Swan,et al.  Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy , 2015 .

[13]  George Siemens,et al.  Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  Lucila Ohno-Machado,et al.  ModelChain: Decentralized Privacy-Preserving Healthcare Predictive Modeling Framework on Private Blockchain Networks , 2018, ArXiv.

[15]  Sachin Shetty,et al.  Security Implications of Blockchain Cloud with Analysis of Block Withholding Attack , 2017, 2017 17th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID).

[16]  Zekeriya Erkin,et al.  DecReg: A Framework for Preventing Double-Financing using Blockchain Technology , 2017 .

[17]  T. V. Lakshman,et al.  The Internet Blockchain: A Distributed, Tamper-Resistant Transaction Framework for the Internet , 2016, HotNets.

[18]  Mandy Lupton,et al.  Learning analytics beyond the LMS: the connected learning analytics toolkit , 2015, LAK.