Price Competition with Reduced Consumer Switching Costs: The Case of "Wireless Number Portability" in the Cellular Phone Industry

Wireless number portability (WNP) is a telecommunication regulatory policy that requires cellular phone service providers to allow customers who switch service subscriptions to retain their original phone numbers. The right to retain the number lowers the switching cost for a consumer. Thus, the purpose of the policy is to induce more competition and facilitate the growth of new or small service providers. In this paper, we show that WNP drives market price downward as expected but with a surprising twistrather than helping the smaller firms grow, the policy may accelerate the process of market concentration. We find that the main contributing factor to this peculiarity is the discriminatory pricing scheme prevalent in the industrythat is, a service provider charges a lower per-minute fee for the calls initiated and received within the same network than for the calls connected across two networks. Under this pricing scheme, a consumer who subscribes to a larger network would benefit more than if subscribing to a smaller network, despite the relatively higher fixed access fee that the former may charge. By lowering the barrier of switching, WNP creates a market condition conducive for a larger network to gain market share. We support our analysis with the empirical evidence gathered from Hong Kong where WNP was adopted in March 1999.

[1]  P. Klemperer The Competitiveness of Markets with Switching Costs , 1987 .

[2]  George Hendrikse,et al.  The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1989 .

[3]  R. Dolan Quantity Discounts: Managerial Issues and Research Opportunities , 1987 .

[4]  Paul Klemperer,et al.  Entry Deterrence in Markets with Consumer Switching Costs , 1987 .

[5]  J. Vickers,et al.  The access pricing problem: a synthesis , 1996 .

[6]  P. Klemperer Markets with consumer switching costs , 1986 .

[7]  Dipak C. Jain,et al.  Pricing Patterns of Cellular Phones and Phonecalls: a Segment-Level Analysis , 1999 .

[8]  Z. John Zhang,et al.  Pay to Switch or Pay to Stay: Preference-Based Price Discrimination in Markets with Switching Costs , 2000 .

[9]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  L. Röller,et al.  Collusive conduct in duopolies : multimarket contact and cross-ownership in the mobile telephone industry , 1997 .

[11]  Theodore To Multi-Period Competition with Switching Costs: An Overlapping Generations Formulation , 1996 .

[12]  Mark Armstrong Competition in telecommunications , 1997 .

[13]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[14]  P. Klemperer Competition when Consumers have Switching Costs: An Overview with Applications to Industrial Organization, Macroeconomics, and International Trade , 1992 .

[15]  Paul Klemperer,et al.  Welfare Effects of Entry Into Markets with Switching Costs , 1988 .

[16]  P. Klemperer,et al.  Multi-Period Competition with Switching Costs , 1992 .

[17]  T. Nilssen Two Kinds of Consumer Switching Costs , 1992 .

[18]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[19]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Dynamic Competition with Switching Costs , 1988 .

[20]  J. Laffont,et al.  Network Competition: I. Overview and Nondiscriminatory Pricing , 1998 .

[21]  J. Laffont,et al.  Network Competition: II. Price Discrimination , 1998 .