Directed technical change and the adoption of CO2 abatement technology: The case of CO2 capture and storage

This paper studies the cost-effectiveness of combining traditional environmental policy, such as CO2-trading schemes, and technology policy that has aims of reducing the cost and speeding the adoption of CO2 abatement technology. For this purpose, we develop a dynamic general equilibrium model that captures empirical links between CO2 emissions associated with energy use, directed technical change and the economy. We specify CO2 capture and storage (CCS) as a discrete CO2 abatement technology. We find that combining CO2-trading schemes with an adoption subsidy is the most effective instrument to induce adoption of the CCS technology. Such a subsidy directly improves the competitiveness of the CCS technology by compensating for its markup over the cost of conventional electricity. Yet, introducing R&D subsidies throughout the entire economy leads to faster adoption of the CCS technology as well and in addition can be cost-effective in achieving the abatement target.

[1]  Brita Bye,et al.  On general versus emission saving R&D support , 2009 .

[2]  A. Löschel,et al.  Technological uncertainty and cost-effectiveness of CO2 emission trading schemes , 2008 .

[3]  Gilbert E. Metcalf,et al.  Energy tax credits and residential conservation investment: Evidence from panel data , 1995 .

[4]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage. Part A: Review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies , 2006 .

[5]  Andreas Löschel,et al.  Directed Technical Change and Climate Policy , 2006 .

[6]  T. Rutherford,et al.  Climate Policies and Induced Technological Change: Which to Choose the Carrot or the Stick? , 2001 .

[7]  Thomas F. Rutherford,et al.  Applied General Equilibrium Modeling with MPSGE as a GAMS Subsystem: An Overview of the Modeling Framework and Syntax , 1999 .

[8]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  International R&D spillovers , 1995 .

[9]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies , 1999 .

[10]  David Popp,et al.  Entice-Br: The Effects of Backstop Technology R&D on Climate Policy Models , 2004 .

[11]  Scott Milliman,et al.  Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control: Reply , 1992 .

[12]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations , 1977 .

[13]  P. Markewitz,et al.  How clean is clean? Incremental versus radical technological change in coal-fired power plants , 2013 .

[14]  Chulho Jung,et al.  Incentives for Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology at the Industry Level: An Evaluation of Policy Alternatives , 1996 .

[15]  B. Zwaan,et al.  Options and Instruments for a Deep Cut in CO2 Emissions: Carbon Dioxide Capture or Renewables, Taxes or Subsidies? , 2006 .

[16]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Rate of Obsolescence of Knowledge, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Research Resources , 1979 .

[17]  Marcelo A. Arbex,et al.  Solow meets Leontief: Economic growth and energy consumption , 2010 .

[18]  Knut Einar Rosendahl,et al.  Cost-effective environmental policy: Implications of induced technological change , 2004 .

[19]  Till Requate,et al.  Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instruments—a survey , 2005 .

[20]  Susanto Basu,et al.  Appropriate Technology and Growth , 1996 .

[21]  M. Ferris,et al.  Complementarity problems in GAMS and the PATH solver 1 This material is based on research supported , 2000 .

[22]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Dynamic Incentives of Environmental Regulations: The Effects of Alternative Policy Instruments on Te , 1995 .

[23]  Bert Metz,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage , 2005 .

[24]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Representing energy technologies in top-down economic models using bottom-up information , 2004 .

[25]  Paul Beaudry,et al.  The Intertemporal Elasticity of Substitution: An Exploration using a US Panel of State Data , 1996 .

[26]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Policy and Technological Change , 2002 .

[27]  L. Goulder,et al.  Optimal Co2 Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technological Change , 1998 .