Hands and Feet Free Driving: Ready or Not?

[1]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  The process of processing: exploring the validity of Neisser's perceptual cycle model with accounts from critical decision-making in the cockpit , 2015, Ergonomics.

[2]  Victoria A Banks,et al.  Contrasting models of driver behaviour in emergencies using retrospective verbalisations and network analysis , 2015, Ergonomics.

[3]  Johannes Weyer,et al.  Human–Machine Cooperation in Smart Cars: An Empirical Investigation of the Loss-of-Control Thesis , 2015 .

[4]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Discovering Driver-vehicle Coordination Problems in Future Automated Control Systems: Evidence from Verbal Commentaries☆ , 2015 .

[5]  N. Stanton,et al.  All for one and one for all: Representing teams as a collection of individuals and an individual collective using a network perceptual cycle approach , 2014 .

[6]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Representing distributed cognition in complex systems: how a submarine returns to periscope depth , 2014, Ergonomics.

[7]  Victoria A Banks,et al.  What the drivers do and do not tell you: using verbal protocol analysis to investigate driver behaviour in emergency situations , 2014, Ergonomics.

[8]  Chouki Sentouh,et al.  Automation-driver cooperative driving in presence of undetected obstacles , 2014 .

[9]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Sub-systems on the road to vehicle automation: Hands and feet free but not 'mind' free driving , 2014 .

[10]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  What the crash dummies don't tell you: The interaction between driver and automation in emergency situations , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[11]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  What is on your mind? Using the perceptual cycle model and critical decision method to understand the decision-making process in the cockpit , 2013, Ergonomics.

[12]  N A Stanton,et al.  Using social network analysis and agent-based modelling to explore information flow using common operational pictures for maritime search and rescue operations , 2013, Ergonomics.

[13]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions , 2013 .

[14]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  The crash at Kerang: Investigating systemic and psychological factors leading to unintentional non-compliance at rail level crossings. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  B. Fleming.  New Automotive Electronics Technologies [Automotive Electronics] , 2012, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[16]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Control Task Substitution in Semiautomated Driving , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Paul M. Salmon,et al.  Systems-based accident analysis methods: A comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP , 2012 .

[18]  Ata M. Khan,et al.  Policy challenges of increasing automation in driving , 2012 .

[19]  Brett R.C. Molesworth,et al.  Tipping point: The narrow path between automation acceptance and rejection in air traffic management , 2012 .

[20]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Why Did the Pilots Shut Down the Wrong Engine? Explaining Errors in Context Using Schema Theory and the Perceptual Cycle Model , 2012 .

[21]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Detection of new in-path targets by drivers using Stop & Go Adaptive Cruise Control. , 2011, Applied ergonomics.

[22]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Safe driving in a green world: a review of driver performance benchmarks and technologies to support 'smart' driving. , 2011, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Exploring the psychological factors involved in the Ladbroke Grove rail accident. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  From ethnography to the EAST method: A tractable approach for representing distributed cognition in Air Traffic Control , 2010, Ergonomics.

[25]  Marika Hoedemaeker,et al.  Driving with a Congestion Assistant; mental workload and acceptance. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Human error taxonomies applied to driving: A generic driver error taxonomy and its implications for intelligent transport systems , 2009 .

[27]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams , 2008 .

[28]  N A Stanton,et al.  What's skill got to do with it? Vehicle automation and driver mental workload , 2007, Ergonomics.

[29]  N A Stanton,et al.  Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology , 2006, Ergonomics.

[30]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Command and control in emergency services operations: a social network analysis , 2006, Ergonomics.

[31]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments , 2006, Ergonomics.

[32]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[33]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Ten Challenges for Making Automation a "Team Player" in Joint Human-Agent Activity , 2004, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[34]  Christina M. Rudin-Brown,et al.  BEHAVIOURAL ADAPTATION TO ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (ACC): IMPLICATIONS FOR PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES , 2004 .

[35]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Coordinating computer-mediated work , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[36]  Steve Parkes,et al.  Trends in the use of verbal protocol analysis in software engineering research , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[37]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Malleable Attentional Resources Theory: A New Explanation for the Effects of Mental Underload on Performance , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[38]  E. Hollnagel.  Extended cognition and the future of ergonomics , 2001 .

[39]  J M Hoc,et al.  From human – machine interaction to human – machine cooperation , 2000, Ergonomics.

[40]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[41]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems , 2000 .

[42]  Marika Hoedemaeker,et al.  Behavioural adaptation to driving with an adaptive cruise control (ACC) , 1998 .

[43]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Fatigue and Automation-Induced Impairments in Simulated Driving Performance , 1998 .

[44]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Out‐of‐the‐loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety , 1997 .

[45]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: Safety implications of automation in vehicles , 1996 .

[46]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  Psychophysiology and adaptive automation , 1996, Biological Psychology.

[47]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[48]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[49]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Situation Awareness in Team Performance: Implications for Measurement and Training , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[50]  Christine A. Halverson,et al.  Inside the cognitive workplace : new technology and air traffic control , 1995 .

[51]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The validity of verbal protocols , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[52]  Roberta Calderwood,et al.  Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[53]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[54]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.