Trace Eyeblink Conditioning in Mice Is Dependent upon the Dorsal Medial Prefrontal Cortex, Cerebellum, and Amygdala: Behavioral Characterization and Functional Circuitry1,2,3

Abstract Trace eyeblink conditioning is useful for studying the interaction of multiple brain areas in learning and memory. The goal of the current work was to determine whether trace eyeblink conditioning could be established in a mouse model in the absence of elicited startle responses and the brain circuitry that supports this learning. We show here that mice can acquire trace conditioned responses (tCRs) devoid of startle while head-restrained and permitted to freely run on a wheel. Most mice (75%) could learn with a trace interval of 250 ms. Because tCRs were not contaminated with startle-associated components, we were able to document the development and timing of tCRs in mice, as well as their long-term retention (at 7 and 14 d) and flexible expression (extinction and reacquisition). To identify the circuitry involved, we made restricted lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and found that learning was prevented. Furthermore, inactivation of the cerebellum with muscimol completely abolished tCRs, demonstrating that learned responses were driven by the cerebellum. Finally, inactivation of the mPFC and amygdala in trained animals nearly abolished tCRs. Anatomical data from these critical regions showed that mPFC and amygdala both project to the rostral basilar pons and overlap with eyelid-associated pontocerebellar neurons. The data provide the first report of trace eyeblink conditioning in mice in which tCRs were driven by the cerebellum and required a localized region of mPFC for acquisition. The data further reveal a specific role for the amygdala as providing a conditioned stimulus-associated input to the cerebellum.

[1]  Selmaan N. Chettih,et al.  Cerebellar-Dependent Expression of Motor Learning during Eyeblink Conditioning in Head-Fixed Mice , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  J. J. Siegel,et al.  Modification of persistent responses in medial prefrontal cortex during learning in trace eyeblink conditioning. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  J. J. Siegel,et al.  Species‐specific differences in the medial prefrontal projections to the pons between rat and rabbit , 2014, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  Hao Chen,et al.  Prefrontal Control of Cerebellum-Dependent Associative Motor Learning , 2014, The Cerebellum.

[5]  J. J. Siegel,et al.  Persistent Activity in Prefrontal Cortex during Trace Eyelid Conditioning: Dissociating Responses That Reflect Cerebellar Output from Those That Do Not , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Maroun,et al.  Medial Prefrontal Cortex , 2013, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[7]  B. Schreurs,et al.  Anatomical Characterization of a Rabbit Cerebellar Eyeblink Premotor Pathway Using Pseudorabies and Identification of a Local Modulatory Network in Anterior Interpositus , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[9]  W. Gan,et al.  Opposite effects of fear conditioning and extinction on dendritic spine remodelling , 2012, Nature.

[10]  Javier F. Medina,et al.  Adaptive Timing of Motor Output in the Mouse: The Role of Movement Oscillations in Eyelid Conditioning , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[11]  M. Mauk,et al.  A Decrementing Form of Plasticity Apparent in Cerebellar Learning , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Endo,et al.  Amygdala, deep cerebellar nuclei and red nucleus contribute to delay eyeblink conditioning in C57BL /6 mice , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  M. Mintz,et al.  Amygdala conditioning modulates sensory input to the cerebellum , 2010, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[14]  M. Mauk,et al.  Eyelid Conditioning to a Target Amplitude: Adding How Much to Whether and When , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Biasi,et al.  Trace Eyeblink Conditioning is Impaired in α7 but not in β2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Knockout Mice , 2010, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[16]  Michael D Mauk,et al.  Temporal patterns of inputs to cerebellum necessary and sufficient for trace eyelid conditioning. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Michael D Mauk,et al.  Cerebellar cortex contributions to the expression and timing of conditioned eyelid responses. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  S. Koekkoek,et al.  Cerebellar and Extracerebellar Involvement in Mouse Eyeblink Conditioning: the ACDC Model , 2009, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[19]  J. Disterhoft,et al.  A novel method for precisely timed stimulation of mouse whiskers in a freely moving preparation: Application for delivery of the conditioned stimulus in trace eyeblink conditioning , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Trygve B. Leergaard,et al.  Topography of the complete corticopontine projection: From experiments to principal Maps , 2007, Front. Neurosci..

[21]  J. Freeman,et al.  Metabolic mapping of the rat cerebellum during delay and trace eyeblink conditioning , 2007, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[22]  J. Disterhoft,et al.  Connections of the caudal anterior cingulate cortex in rabbit: Neural circuitry participating in the acquisition of trace eyeblink conditioning , 2007, Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Ewers,et al.  Associative and motor learning in 12-month-old transgenic APP+PS1 mice , 2006, Neurobiology of Aging.

[24]  E. De Schutter,et al.  Deletion of FMR1 in Purkinje Cells Enhances Parallel Fiber LTD, Enlarges Spines, and Attenuates Cerebellar Eyelid Conditioning in Fragile X Syndrome , 2005, Neuron.

[25]  Yutaka Kirino,et al.  Role of hippocampal NMDA receptors in trace eyeblink conditioning , 2005, Brain Research.

[26]  J. Disterhoft,et al.  Acute stress facilitates trace eyeblink conditioning in C57BL/6 male mice and increases the excitability of their CA1 pyramidal neurons. , 2005, Learning & memory.

[27]  Kuei Y Tseng,et al.  Dopamine–Glutamate Interactions Controlling Prefrontal Cortical Pyramidal Cell Excitability Involve Multiple Signaling Mechanisms , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Kim,et al.  Differential Effects of Cerebellar, Amygdalar, and Hippocampal Lesions on Classical Eyeblink Conditioning in Rats , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Yutaka Kirino,et al.  Time-Dependent Reorganization of the Brain Components Underlying Memory Retention in Trace Eyeblink Conditioning , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Disterhoft,et al.  Activity profiles of single neurons in caudal anterior cingulate cortex during trace eyeblink conditioning in the rabbit. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  M. Mauk,et al.  What the cerebellum computes , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[32]  M. Kano,et al.  mGluR1 in cerebellar Purkinje cells is required for normal association of temporally contiguous stimuli in classical conditioning , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[33]  G. Quirk,et al.  Neurons in medial prefrontal cortex signal memory for fear extinction , 2002, Nature.

[34]  J. Churchwell,et al.  Medial prefrontal cortex and pavlovian conditioning: trace versus delay conditioning. , 2002, Behavioral neuroscience.

[35]  S. Kawahara,et al.  Effects of the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 on classical eyeblink conditioning in mice , 2001, Neuropharmacology.

[36]  George Paxinos,et al.  The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 2001 .

[37]  Javier F. Medina,et al.  Timing Mechanisms in the Cerebellum: Testing Predictions of a Large-Scale Computer Simulation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Koch,et al.  The neurobiology of startle , 1999, Progress in Neurobiology.

[39]  Craig Weiss,et al.  Hippocampal lesions prevent trace eyeblink conditioning in the freely moving rat , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[40]  John F. Disterhoft,et al.  Lesions of the Caudal Area of Rabbit Medial Prefrontal Cortex Impair Trace Eyeblink Conditioning , 1998, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[41]  M. Koch,et al.  Acoustic Startle-Evoked Potentials in the Rat Amygdala: Effect of Kindling , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[42]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Intrinsic connections of the rat amygdaloid complex: Projections originating in the accessory basal nucleus , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[43]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Hippocampectomy impairs the memory of recently, but not remotely, acquired trace eyeblink conditioned responses. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[44]  D. Powell,et al.  Efferent connections of the medial prefrontal cortex in the rabbit , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  G. Mihailoff,et al.  Survey of noncortical afferent projections to the basilar pontine nuclei: A retrograde tracing study in the rat , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[46]  Michael Davis,et al.  Temporal characteristics of enhancement of startle by stimulation of the amygdala , 1988, Physiology & Behavior.

[47]  M. Wiesendanger,et al.  The corticopontine system in the rat. II. The projection pattern , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[48]  M. Wiesendanger,et al.  The corticopontine system in the rat. I. Mapping of corticopontine neurons , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[49]  G. A. Clark,et al.  Initial localization of the memory trace for a basic form of learning. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[51]  Boneau Ca The interstimulus interval and the latency of the conditioned eyelid response. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[52]  J. J. Siegel,et al.  Persistent activity in a cortical-to-subcortical circuit: bridging the temporal gap in trace eyelid conditioning. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  M. Mauk,et al.  Interactions between prefrontal cortex and cerebellum revealed by trace eyelid conditioning. , 2009, Learning & memory.

[54]  J. Disterhoft,et al.  Trace eyeblink conditioning is hippocampally dependent in mice , 2004, Hippocampus.

[55]  M. Glickstein,et al.  Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  E. Jolkkonen,et al.  Intrinsic connections of the rat amygdaloid complex: Projections originating in the central nucleus , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[57]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Classical conditioning in rabbits using pontine nucleus stimulation as a conditioned stimulus and inferior olive stimulation as an unconditioned stimulus , 1989, Synapse.