Do the Kyoto Protocol, geopolitical risks, human capital and natural resources affect the sustainability limit? A new environmental approach based on the LCC hypothesis

[1]  Mohammad Razib Hossain,et al.  Natural resource dependency and environmental sustainability under N-shaped EKC: The curious case of India , 2023, Resources Policy.

[2]  T. Adebayo,et al.  A comparison of CO2 emissions, load capacity factor, and ecological footprint for Thailand’s environmental sustainability , 2022, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[3]  Ugur Korkut Pata,et al.  Enhancing environmental quality in the United States by linking biomass energy consumption and load capacity factor , 2022, Geoscience Frontiers.

[4]  U. Pata,et al.  The role of ICT, R&D spending and renewable energy consumption on environmental quality: Testing the LCC hypothesis for G7 countries , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[5]  M. Kartal,et al.  Impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses for South Korea , 2022, Nuclear Engineering and Technology.

[6]  T. Adebayo,et al.  The effect of financial globalization and natural resource rent on load capacity factor in India: an analysis using the dual adjustment approach , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[7]  Joshua Sunday Riti,et al.  Geopolitical risk and environmental degradation in BRICS: Aggregation bias and policy inference , 2022, Energy Policy.

[8]  U. Pata,et al.  Do renewable and nuclear energy enhance environmental quality in France? A new EKC approach with the load capacity factor , 2022, Progress in Nuclear Energy.

[9]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Determinants of load capacity factor in South Korea: does structural change matter? , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[10]  Zeeshan Fareed,et al.  Revisiting the EKC Hypothesis With Export Diversification and Ecological Footprint Pressure Index for India: A RALS-Fourier Cointegration Test , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[11]  S. Chupradit,et al.  The role of renewable energy consumption and health expenditures in improving load capacity factor in ASEAN countries: Exploring new paradigm using advance panel models , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[12]  Muhammad Aamir Khan,et al.  Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[13]  D. Zha,et al.  Interplay between urbanization and ecological footprints: Differential roles of indigenous and foreign innovations in ASEAN-4 , 2022, Environmental Science & Policy.

[14]  Matteo Iacoviello,et al.  Measuring Geopolitical Risk , 2018, International Finance Discussion Papers.

[15]  Xuemeng Xiao,et al.  Economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risks, energy output and ecological footprint—Empirical evidence from China , 2022, Energy Reports.

[16]  Derviş Kırıkkaleli,et al.  Load Capacity Factor and Financial Globalization in Brazil: The Role of Renewable Energy and Urbanization , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[17]  Cem Işık,et al.  Determinants of the load capacity factor in China: A novel dynamic ARDL approach for ecological footprint accounting , 2021, Resources Policy.

[18]  G. B. Amegavi,et al.  Income inequality, human capital, natural resource abundance, and ecological footprint in ECOWAS member countries , 2021 .

[19]  Munir Ahmad,et al.  Linking energy transitions, energy consumption, and environmental sustainability in OECD countries , 2021, Gondwana Research.

[20]  Zeeshan Fareed,et al.  Role of Export Diversification and Renewable Energy on the Load Capacity Factor in Indonesia: A Fourier Quantile Causality Approach , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[21]  A. Caglar,et al.  The ecological footprint facing asymmetric natural resources challenges: evidence from the USA , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[22]  A. Zakari,et al.  Investigation into the social behavioural effects on a country's ecological footprint: Evidence from Central Europe , 2021 .

[23]  Soumen Rej,et al.  Can nuclear energy fuel an environmentally sustainable economic growth? Revisiting the EKC hypothesis for India , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[24]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  Modelling the dynamic linkages between eco-innovation, urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprints for G7 countries: Does financial globalization matter? , 2021, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[25]  Ruhul Salim,et al.  The Effect of Human Capital on CO2 Emissions: Macro Evidence from China , 2021 .

[26]  H. Lean,et al.  Do Economic Policy Uncertainty and Geopolitical Risk Lead to Environmental Degradation? Evidence from Emerging Economies , 2021, Sustainability.

[27]  U. Pata.  Do renewable energy and health expenditures improve load capacity factor in the USA and Japan? A new approach to environmental issues , 2021, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[28]  Amit Kumar,et al.  The Influence of Hydropower and Coal Consumption on Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Comparison between China and India , 2021 .

[29]  J. Hussain,et al.  The repercussions of financial development and corruption on energy efficiency and ecological footprint: Evidence from BRICS and next 11 countries , 2021 .

[30]  E. Selvanathan,et al.  Energy consumption, tourism, economic growth and CO2 emissions nexus in India , 2021 .

[31]  U. Pata.  Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: A sustainability perspective , 2021 .

[32]  Malayaranjan Sahoo,et al.  Does information and communication technology and financial development lead to environmental sustainability in India? An empirical insight , 2021, Telematics Informatics.

[33]  C. Harvie,et al.  Energy security, economic growth and environmental sustainability in India: Does FDI and trade openness play a role? , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[34]  Recep Ulucak,et al.  An empirical investigation of nuclear energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission in India: Bridging IPAT and EKC hypotheses , 2020 .

[35]  Mucahit Aydin,et al.  Are natural resources abundance and human development a solution for environmental pressure? Evidence from top ten countries with the largest ecological footprint , 2020 .

[36]  Irfan Khan,et al.  The environmental footprint of China-Africa engagement: An analysis of the effect of China - Africa partnership on carbon emissions. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[37]  F. Bekun,et al.  Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: Linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in BRICS. , 2020, Resources Policy.

[38]  A. Caglar,et al.  Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break , 2020 .

[39]  Muhammad Yousaf Malik,et al.  Does green investment, financial development and natural resources rent limit carbon emissions? A provincial panel analysis of China. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[40]  Muhammad Nasir Malik,et al.  Foreign direct investment and education as determinants of environmental quality: The importance of post Paris Agreement (COP21). , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[41]  Irfan Khan,et al.  The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: Fresh evidence from the United States of America. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[42]  M. Shahbaz,et al.  Environmental cost of natural resources utilization and economic growth: Can China shift some burden through globalization for sustainable development? , 2020, Sustainable Development.

[43]  X. Vo,et al.  Globalization and carbon emissions: Is there any role of agriculture value-added, financial development, and natural resource rent in the aftermath of COP21? , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[44]  Zahoor Ahmed,et al.  Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China , 2020, Resources Policy.

[45]  Chien‐Chiang Lee,et al.  Mitigation pathways impact of climate change and improving sustainable development: The roles of natural resources, income, and CO2 emission , 2020 .

[46]  A. Zakari,et al.  Energy consumption, economic expansion, and CO2 emission in the UK: The role of economic policy uncertainty. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[47]  Daniel Balsalobre-lorente,et al.  The dynamic effects of globalization process in analysing N-shaped tourism led growth hypothesis , 2020, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management.

[48]  E. Udemba.  Mediation of foreign direct investment and agriculture towards ecological footprint: a shift from single perspective to a more inclusive perspective for India , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[49]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: An empirical analysis , 2020 .

[50]  Sumayya,et al.  The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: Accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries , 2020 .

[51]  Danish,et al.  Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization , 2020 .

[52]  A. Tiwari,et al.  Geopolitical risk, economic policy uncertainty and tourist arrivals: Evidence from a developing country , 2019, Tourism Management.

[53]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: The case of the United States , 2019, Resources Policy.

[54]  Oumarou Zallé.  Natural resources and economic growth in Africa: The role of institutional quality and human capital , 2019, Resources Policy.

[55]  R. Mcnown,et al.  An augmented autoregressive distributed lag bounds test for cointegration , 2019, Economic Modelling.

[56]  Zhaohua Wang,et al.  Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: An empirical analysis , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[57]  Zhaohua Wang,et al.  Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[58]  Nada Maamoun,et al.  The Kyoto protocol: Empirical evidence of a hidden success , 2019, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.

[59]  O. Usman,et al.  Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in India: the effects of energy consumption and democracy , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[60]  Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie,et al.  A review on Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[61]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey , 2019, Journal of Economic Studies.

[62]  J. Sturm,et al.  The KOF Globalisation Index – revisited , 2019, The Review of International Organizations.

[63]  Heleen de Coninck,et al.  Technical Summary. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways , 2018 .

[64]  N. Vink,et al.  The effects of urbanization and globalization on CO2 emissions: evidence from the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[65]  Yuhuan Zhao,et al.  Identifying the impacts of human capital on carbon emissions in Pakistan , 2018 .

[66]  R. Mcnown,et al.  Bootstrapping the autoregressive distributed lag test for cointegration , 2018 .

[67]  C. Fang,et al.  Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from countries with different income levels , 2018 .

[68]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  Estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 emission: Role of renewable energy generation in India , 2018 .

[69]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? , 2018 .

[70]  Lukas Figge,et al.  Determinants of Ecological Footprints: What is the role of globalization? , 2017 .

[71]  Mohammad Salahuddin,et al.  Ecological footprint and real income: panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries , 2017 .

[72]  S. Mitra,et al.  The environmental Kuznets curve for carbon dioxide in India and China: Growth and pollution at crossroad , 2017 .

[73]  R. Muttarak,et al.  Green Returns to Education: Does Schooling Contribute to Pro-Environmental Behaviours? Evidence from Thailand , 2017 .

[74]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Does urbanization cause increasing energy demand in Pakistan? Empirical evidence from STIRPAT model , 2017 .

[75]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: An aggregate and disaggregate analysis of the Indian economy , 2016 .

[76]  Yue‐Jun Zhang,et al.  The Impact of Urbanization on Carbon Emission: Empirical Evidence in Beijing , 2015, Energy Procedia.

[77]  Hrushikesh Mallick,et al.  Does Globalization Impede Environmental Quality in India , 2015 .

[78]  Amanda M. Rosen.  The Wrong Solution at the Right Time: The Failure of the Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change , 2015 .

[79]  Mohamed Amine Boutabba.  The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: Evidence from the Indian economy , 2014 .

[80]  Muhammad Nasir,et al.  The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa , 2013 .

[81]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  What Do We Learn from the Weather? The New Climate-Economy Literature , 2013 .

[82]  Rahel Aichele,et al.  The Effect of the Kyoto Protocol on Carbon Emissions , 2013 .

[83]  R. Feenstra,et al.  The Next Generation of the Penn World Table , 2013 .

[84]  Sajal Ghosh,et al.  Environmental Kuznet’s curve for India: Evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structuralbreaks , 2013 .

[85]  Pradip Bhattacharyya,et al.  Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Composition, and Management: The World Scenario , 2012 .

[86]  Aviral Kumar Tiwari,et al.  The environmental Kuzents Curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy , 2012 .

[87]  Bram Edens,et al.  The changing wealth of nations : measuring sustainable development in the new millennium , 2010 .

[88]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Convergence of ecological footprint and emergy analysis as a sustainability indicator of countries: Peru as case study , 2010 .

[89]  Sajal Ghosh,et al.  Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: A multivariate cointegration approach , 2010 .

[90]  P. Narayan,et al.  The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests , 2005 .

[91]  Junsoo Lee,et al.  Minimum LM Unit Root Test with One Structural Break , 2004 .

[92]  Clement A. Tisdell,et al.  Globalisation and sustainability: environmental Kuznets curve and the WTO , 2001 .

[93]  Richard J. Smith,et al.  Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships , 2001 .

[94]  D. Andrews,et al.  Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis , 1992 .

[95]  P. Perron,et al.  The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock And The Unit Root Hypothesis , 1989 .

[96]  W. Fuller,et al.  Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root , 1979 .