Dimensions of the Need for Cognition: Subscales and Gender Differences.

The Need for Cognition (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982) scale has been used, predominantly in the persuasion literature, to assess the degree to which individuals tend to engage in elaborative thought. Using both statistically appropriate methods for the factor analysis of dichotomous variables and latent variable models, we report studies which discuss the development and validation of subscales of the NFC. The findings suggest that three subscales (Cognitive Persistence, Cognitive Confidence, and Cognitive Complexity), representing three different domains of elaborative thought, can be identified. A gender difference was obtained consistently on the Cognitive Persistence Scale: Women scored higher than men. Finally, using latent variable modeling methodologies, we present some initial exploratory evidence regarding cohort differences. We find no statistically significant relation between years of education and NFC subscale scores. Implications of the subscales and potential correlates of the gender difference found for Cognitive Persistence are discussed.

[1]  S. Gangestad,et al.  On the nature of self-monitoring: matters of assessment, matters of validity. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  R. Helmreich,et al.  Masculinity & femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents , 1978 .

[3]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. , 1983 .

[4]  M. Browne.  Generalized Least Squares Estimators in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. , 1973 .

[5]  K. Deaux.  From individual differences to social categories: analysis of a decade's research on gender , 1984 .

[6]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[7]  A. Kruglanski.  Lay epistemo-logic—process and contents: Another look at attribution theory. , 1980 .

[8]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[9]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  Sex Differences in Empathy and Related Capacities , 1983 .

[10]  Judith A. Hall.  Nonverbal sex differences : communication accuracy and expressive style , 1984 .

[11]  R. Lennox,et al.  Revision of the self-monitoring scale. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  S. Briggs,et al.  The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales , 1986 .

[13]  S. Chaiken.  The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .

[14]  M. Snyder.  Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[15]  George J. Huba.  A computer program for restricted oblique Procrustes rotation to a primary factor pattern matrix , 1975 .

[16]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[17]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[18]  I. Frieze.  Women and Sex Roles: A Social Psychological Perspective , 1978 .

[19]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[20]  J. S. Tanaka,et al.  Factor Invariance Of Premorbid Social Competence Across Multiple Population Of Schizophrenics. , 1983, Multivariate behavioral research.

[21]  M. Hoffman,et al.  Sex differences in empathy and related behaviors. , 1977, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  The Freezing and Unfreezing of Impressional Primacy , 1985 .

[23]  M. Browne.  Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. , 1984, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[24]  N. Sanford.  A Personal Account of the Study of Authoritarianism: Comment on Samelson , 1986 .

[25]  S. Messick.  The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice , 1984 .

[26]  Leonard G. Rorer.  THE GREAT RESPONSE-STYLE MYTH. , 1965 .

[27]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Factor analysis by generalized least squares , 1972 .

[28]  Arnold H. Buss,et al.  An analysis of the Self-Monitoring Scale. , 1980 .