The Belt-Rib Concept: A Structronic Approach to Variable Camber

The belt-rib concept for lifting surfaces with variable camber evolved at DLR recently as one of the most promising solutions for the adaptive wing. With the belt-rib idea the adaptive wing issue is approached in a new way: instead of a “mechatronic” solution with hinges or linear bearings a “structronic” solution is chosen, where distributed flexibility allows the desired shape changes. The resulting system is not only easier to maintain due to the absence of wear, but also is structurally more reliable and substantially lighter. The new concept evolves from the classical wing structure. The classical rib, which is in charge of the wing section’s stiffness, is replaced by a “belt rib,” which allows camber changes within given limits while leaving the remaining in-plane stiffness properties of the section widely unchanged. The evolution of the belt-rib concept was accompanied by experimental tests on different prototypes. After a first development stage, in which mainly the system’s shape adaptability and the overall stiffness properties were investigated, further steps followed, focused on manufacturing, weight optimization and strength aspects. Recent developments dealt with the construction of a model with solid-state hinges, realized as hybrid glass fiber-carbon-fiber reinforced composite structure. The model is actuated mechanically by cables, which can be replaced by multifunctional actuators—like shape memory wires—in the future. The paper opens with an introduction about shape control of aerospace structures and variable camber in particular, in which the major advantages of a “structronic” approach with respect to classical solutions are discussed. Then the fundamentals of the belt-rib concept are sketched, with some significant results of the feasibility proof phase, followed by the description of the last developments. The conclusion summarizes the potential of a structronic approach to shape control with an outline of possible future work.

[1]  J. Szodruch,et al.  Variable wing camber for transport aircraft , 1988 .

[2]  J. Renken,et al.  Mission-adaptive wing camber control systems for transport aircraft , 1985 .

[3]  J. Szodruch,et al.  The influence of camber variation on the aerodynamics of civil transport aircraft , 1985 .

[4]  Inderjit Chopra,et al.  Review of current status of smart structures and integrated systems , 1996, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[5]  Jonathan D. Bartley-Cho,et al.  Improved design and performance of the SMA torque tube for the DARPA Smart Wing program , 1999, Smart Structures.

[6]  J. J. Spillman,et al.  The use of variable camber to reduce drag, weight and costs of transport aircraft , 1992, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[7]  Ron Barrett,et al.  Adaptive flight control surfaces, wings, rotors, and active aerodynamics , 1996, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[8]  Gareth J. Knowles,et al.  Static shape control for adaptive wings , 1994 .

[9]  Ronald L. Spangler,et al.  Active vibration-suppression systems applied to twin-tail buffeting , 1998, Smart Structures.

[10]  Czesław Marchaj,et al.  Sail Performance: Theory and Practice , 1996 .

[11]  Jonathan D. Bartley-Cho,et al.  Design and fabrication of Smart Wing wind tunnel model and SMA control surfaces , 1999, Smart Structures.

[12]  L. F. Campanile,et al.  Adaptive wing model for wind channel tests , 2000 .

[13]  Anuradha M. Annaswamy,et al.  Active Control Technology for Enhanced Performance Operational Capabilities of Military Aircraft, Land Vehicles and Sea Vehicles , 2001 .