An automated system for the objective evaluation of human gustatory sensitivity using tongue biopotential recordings

The goal of this work is to develop an automatic system for the evaluation of the gustatory sensitivity of patients using an electrophysiological recording of the response of bud cells to taste stimuli. In particular, the study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and limitations of supervised classifiers in the discrimination between subjects belonging to the three 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taster categories (supertasters, medium tasters, and non-tasters), exploiting features extracted from electrophysiological recordings of the tongue. Thirty-nine subjects (equally divided into the three PROP status classes by standard non-objective scaling methods) underwent a non-invasive, differential, biopotential recording of their tongues during stimulation with PROP by using a custom-made, flexible, silver electrode. Two different classifiers were trained to recognize up to seven different features extracted from the recorded depolarization signal. The classification results indicate that the identified set of features allows to distinguish between PROP tasters and non-tasters (average accuracy of 80% ± 18% and up to 94% ± 15% when only supertasters and non-tasters are considered), but medium tasters were difficult to identify. However, these apparent classification errors are related to uncertainty in the labeling procedures, which are based on non-objective tests, in which the subjects provided borderline evaluations. Thus, using the proposed method, it is possible, for the first time, to automatically achieve objective PROP taster status identification with high accuracy. The simplicity of the recording technique allows for easy reproduction of the experimental setting; thus the technique can be used in future studies to evaluate other gustatory stimuli. The proposed approach represents the first objective and automatic method to directly measure human gustatory responses and a milestone for physiological taste studies, with applications ranging from basic science to food tasting evaluations.

[1]  A. L. Fox.  The Relationship between Chemical Constitution and Taste. , 1932, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  H. Kalmus,et al.  Chemical specificity in genetical differences of taste sensitivity. , 1949, Annals of eugenics.

[3]  E. Glanville,et al.  Taste Perception and the Menstrual Cycle , 1965, Nature.

[4]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Bitterness of KCl and benzoate: Related to genetic status for sensitivity to PTC/PROP. , 1988 .

[6]  L. Bartoshuk.  The biological basis of food perception and acceptance , 1993 .

[7]  Linda M. Bartoshuk,et al.  PTC/PROP tasting: Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[8]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[9]  B. Tepper.  6-n-Propylthiouracil: a genetic marker for taste, with implications for food preference and dietary habits. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  B. Tepper,et al.  PROP Taster Status Is Related to Fat Perception and Preference a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  C. Bell,et al.  Localization of a gene for bitter-taste perception to human chromosome 5p15. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[12]  V. Duffy,et al.  Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste. , 2000, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[13]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[14]  Beverly J. Tepper,et al.  Development of brief methods to classify individuals by PROP taster status , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[15]  Mark Leppert,et al.  Positional Cloning of the Human Quantitative Trait Locus Underlying Taste Sensitivity to Phenylthiocarbamide , 2003, Science.

[16]  H. Coon,et al.  Genetic analysis of a complex trait in the Utah Genetic Reference Project: a major locus for PTC taste ability on chromosome 7q and a secondary locus on chromosome 16p , 2003, Human Genetics.

[17]  B. Tepper,et al.  A paper screening test to assess genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil , 2003, Physiology & Behavior.

[18]  Michael J Bamshad,et al.  Natural selection and molecular evolution in PTC, a bitter-taste receptor gene. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  L. Marks,et al.  Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching , 2004, Physiology & Behavior.

[20]  K. Kidd,et al.  Bitter receptor gene (TAS2R38), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and alcohol intake. , 2004, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[21]  D. Reed,et al.  Genetic and Environmental Determinants of Bitter Perception and Sweet Preferences , 2005, Pediatrics.

[22]  J. Slack,et al.  The Molecular Basis of Individual Differences in Phenylthiocarbamide and Propylthiouracil Bitterness Perception , 2005, Current Biology.

[23]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  Generalized Bradley-Terry Models and Multi-Class Probability Estimates , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[24]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil has no influence on dietary patterns, body mass indexes, or plasma lipid profiles of women. , 2007, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[25]  J. Hayes,et al.  Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures: sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation. , 2007, Chemical senses.

[26]  Judith R Kidd,et al.  Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene. , 2008, Chemical senses.

[27]  B. Tepper,et al.  Nutritional implications of genetic taste variation: the role of PROP sensitivity and other taste phenotypes. , 2008, Annual review of nutrition.

[28]  P. Gasparini,et al.  Variation in the Bitter‐taste Receptor Gene TAS2R38, and Adiposity in a Genetically Isolated Population in Southern Italy , 2008, Obesity.

[29]  John Prescott,et al.  Acquired hedonic and sensory characteristics of odours: Influence of sweet liker and propylthiouracil taster status , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  F. Duke,et al.  Age modifies the genotype-phenotype relationship for the bitter receptor TAS2R38 , 2010, BMC Genetics.

[31]  B. Tepper,et al.  Sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil is associated with gustin (carbonic anhydrase VI) gene polymorphism, salivary zinc, and body mass index in humans. , 2010, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[32]  Z. Kutalik,et al.  Sensitivity of Genome-Wide-Association Signals to Phenotyping Strategy: The PROP-TAS2R38 Taste Association as a Benchmark , 2011, PloS one.

[33]  T. Cabras,et al.  Responsiveness to 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) Is Associated with Salivary Levels of Two Specific Basic Proline-Rich Proteins in Humans , 2012, PloS one.

[34]  Fernando Seoane,et al.  Textile Electrodes for EEG Recording — A Pilot Study , 2012, Sensors.

[35]  S. Banni,et al.  Taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil is associated with endocannabinoid plasma levels in normal-weight individuals. , 2013, Nutrition.

[36]  S. V. Lipchock,et al.  Human bitter perception correlates with bitter receptor messenger RNA expression in taste cells. , 2013, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[37]  R. Crnjar,et al.  Marked Increase in PROP Taste Responsiveness Following Oral Supplementation with Selected Salivary Proteins or Their Related Free Amino Acids , 2013, PloS one.

[38]  S. Cabras,et al.  The Gustin (CA6) Gene Polymorphism, rs2274333 (A/G), as a Mechanistic Link between PROP Tasting and Fungiform Taste Papilla Density and Maintenance , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  Beverly J. Tepper,et al.  Genetic Sensitivity to the Bitter Taste of 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) and Its Association with Physiological Mechanisms Controlling Body Mass Index (BMI) , 2014, Nutrients.

[40]  J. Hayes,et al.  Exploring associations between taste perception, oral anatomy and polymorphisms in the carbonic anhydrase (gustin) gene CA6 , 2014, Physiology & Behavior.

[41]  R. Crnjar,et al.  The gustin (CA6) gene polymorphism, rs2274333 (A/G), is associated with fungiform papilla density, whereas PROP bitterness is mostly due to TAS2R38 in an ethnically-mixed population , 2015, Physiology & Behavior.

[42]  Claudia Caltagirone,et al.  Dose-Dependent Effects of L-Arginine on PROP Bitterness Intensity and Latency and Characteristics of the Chemical Interaction between PROP and L-Arginine , 2015, PloS one.

[43]  Patrizia Muroni,et al.  Associations between Orosensory Perception of Oleic Acid, the Common Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (rs1761667 and rs1527483) in the CD36 Gene, and 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) Tasting , 2015, Nutrients.

[44]  Jesús Hernández,et al.  Automatic counting of fungiform papillae by shape using cross-correlation , 2016, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[45]  R. Crnjar,et al.  Sensory perception of and salivary protein response to astringency as a function of the 6-n-propylthioural (PROP) bitter-taste phenotype , 2017, Physiology & Behavior.

[46]  Piero Cosseddu,et al.  First objective evaluation of taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), a paradigm gustatory stimulus in humans , 2017, Scientific Reports.