Project Is as Project Does

The purpose of the article is to further develop the processual approach in project management theorizing. The article introduces Gadamer’s (2004) play ontology as a novel perspective used to describe microactivities in a project environment. Play ontology refers to the back-and-forth movements of seemingly mundane microactivities as they unfold during a project. The findings of the study suggest that sensitivity to the microactivities allows considering dissonant or indecisive events as vital and constructive project elements. Play ontology offers new ways for conceptualizing a project as a process: as something that emerges through practical activities as a dynamic and complex phenomenon.

[1]  T. Hernes,et al.  Process is How Process Does , 2014 .

[2]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  Introduction: Process Thinking, Process Theorizing and Process Researching , 2016 .

[3]  J. Sanderson.  Risk, uncertainty and governance in megaprojects: A critical discussion of alternative explanations , 2012 .

[4]  Stephen Jonathan Whitty,et al.  A Heideggerian paradigm for project management: Breaking free of the disciplinary matrix and its Cartesian ontology , 2015 .

[5]  Jude Jones,et al.  Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy , 1997 .

[6]  Dvora Yanow,et al.  Giving Voice to Space: Academic Practices and the Material World , 2010 .

[7]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  Project-as-Practice: In Search of Project Management Research that Matters , 2010, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[8]  J. Geraldi,et al.  Errors, lies and misunderstandings: Systematic review on behavioural decision making in projects , 2017 .

[9]  Naomi J. Brookes,et al.  A ‘Strategy-as-Practice’ exploration of lean construction strategizing , 2012 .

[10]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Process studies of change in organization and management : unveiling temporality, activity, and flow , 2013 .

[11]  Tina Karrbom Gustavsson,et al.  Goal seeking and goal oriented projects : trajectories of the temporary organisation , 2015 .

[12]  Svetlana. Cicmil,et al.  New Possibilities for Project Management Theory: A Critical Engagement , 2006 .

[13]  S. Cicmil.  Understanding Project Management Practice through Interpretative and Critical Research Perspectives , 2006 .

[14]  A. Langley.  Process thinking in strategic organization , 2007 .

[15]  Aurélie Toivonen,et al.  The transformative effect of top management governance choices on project team identity and relationship with the organization — An agency and stewardship approach , 2014 .

[16]  J. Söderlund.  Pluralism in Project Management: Navigating the Crossroads of Specialization and Fragmentation , 2011 .

[17]  L. Crevani,et al.  Project Leadership in Becoming: A Process Study of an Organizational Change Project , 2014 .

[18]  Perttu Salovaara.  Accounting for the messiness of the research process: the fieldpath approach , 2018, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal.

[19]  Robert Chia,et al.  Essai : Thirty Years On: From Organizational Structures to the Organization of Thought , 1997 .

[20]  Ann,et al.  Truth and method , 1994, Journal of Religion and Health.

[21]  M. Pitman.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1998 .

[22]  Terry Williams,et al.  Managing the Social Trajectory: A Practice Perspective on Project Management , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[23]  Stephen Jonathan Whitty,et al.  The praxis of ‘alignment seeking’ in project work , 2017 .

[24]  Erika Sauer,et al.  Leadership in Spaces and Places , 2015 .

[25]  J. Orr,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[26]  L. Crevani,et al.  Process Studies of Project Organizing , 2020 .

[27]  Robert Chia,et al.  Paradigms and Perspectives in Organizational Project Management Research: Implications for Knowledge‑Creation , 2013 .

[28]  L. Patterson.  Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences , 2008 .

[29]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[30]  D. Kavanagh,et al.  From project ontologies to communities of virtue , 2004 .

[31]  S. Cicmil,et al.  The wisdom of conversations: Existential Hermeneutic Phenomenology (EHP) for project managers , 2017 .

[32]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Relating, reflecting and routinizing: Developing project competence in cooperation with others , 2008 .

[33]  Viviane Sergi,et al.  Bounded becoming: insights from understanding projects in situation , 2012 .

[34]  Tor Hernes,et al.  Process as the Becoming of Temporal Trajectory , 2017 .

[35]  R. Whittington.  Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research , 2006 .