Cost effectiveness of perindopril in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease using data from the EUROPA study

Background: The EUropean trial on Reduction Of cardiac events with Perindopril in stable coronary Artery disease (EUROPA) trial has recently reported. Objective: To assess the cost effectiveness of perindopril in stable coronary heart disease in the UK. Methods: Clinical and resource use data were taken from the EUROPA trial. Costs included drugs and hospitalisations. Health-related quality of life values were taken from published sources. A cost-effectiveness analysis is presented as a function of the risk of a primary event (non-fatal myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest or cardiovascular death) in order to identify people for whom treatment offers greatest value for money. Results: The median incremental cost of perindopril for each quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained across the heterogeneous population of EUROPA was estimated as £9700 (interquartile range £6400–£14 200). Overall, 88% of the EUROPA population had an estimated cost per QALY below £20 000 and 97% below £30 000. For a threshold value of cost effectiveness of £30 000 per QALY gained, treatment of people representing the 25th, 50th (median) and 75th centiles of the cost effectiveness distribution for perindopril has a probability of 0.999, 0.99 and 0.93 of being cost effective, respectively. Cost effectiveness was strongly related to higher risk of a primary event under standard care. Conclusions: Whether the use of perindopril can be considered cost effective depends on the threshold value of cost effectiveness of healthcare systems. For the large majority of patients included in EUROPA, the incremental cost per QALY gained was lower than the apparent threshold used by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in the UK.

[1]  M. Sculpher,et al.  Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. , 2001, Health economics.

[2]  B. Pitt,et al.  Effect of enalapril on myocardial infarction and unstable angina in patients with low ejection fractions , 1992, The Lancet.

[3]  Dick M. Goedhart,et al.  Treatment benefit by perindopril in patients with stable coronary artery disease at different levels of risk. , 2006, European heart journal.

[4]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. , 2000 .

[5]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition in stable coronary artery disease. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  J. Brazier,et al.  Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  M J Al,et al.  Costs, effects and C/E-ratios alongside a clinical trial. , 1994, Health economics.

[8]  J E Ware,et al.  Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  Ron Goeree,et al.  Probabilistic Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness Models: Choosing between Treatment Strategies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease , 2002, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[10]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Cost Implications of the Use of Ramipril in High-Risk Patients Based on the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study , 2003 .

[11]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Cost implications of the use of ramipril in high-risk patients based on the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study. , 2003, Circulation.

[12]  J. Brazier,et al.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. , 2002, Journal of health economics.

[13]  M. Aoki,et al.  Inhibition of Neointima by Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor in Porcine Coronary Artery Balloon-Injury Model , 2001, Hypertension.

[14]  H. Drexler,et al.  Role of bradykinin in mediating vascular effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in humans. , 1997, Circulation.

[15]  Anthony J Culyer,et al.  National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  David Parkin,et al.  Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis. , 2004, Health economics.

[17]  K. Fox,et al.  Efficacy of perindopril in reduction of cardiovascular events among patients with stable coronary artery disease: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (the EUROPA study) , 2003, The Lancet.

[18]  Kukin Ml The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study. , 2001, Current cardiology reports.

[19]  G. Lamas,et al.  Effects of captopril on ischemic events after myocardial infarction. Results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement trial. SAVE Investigators. , 1994, Circulation.

[20]  J Raftery,et al.  NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Disciplinary Committee,et al.  Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain , 2002 .

[22]  D. Vaughan,et al.  Effect of activation and inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system on plasma PAI-1. , 1998, Hypertension.