Assessing the risk of potentially invasive plant species in central Europe

Summary A risk assessment system was developed to assess the invasion potential of new environmental weeds in central Europe. A pre-evaluation step excludes species that are officially controlled, widespread, or intended for use in protected cultures only. Species eligible for risk assessment are classified into three categories (high risk, further observation required, low risk) by rating them according to various biogeographical and ecological aspects. The rating system was validated by testing 47 well-known invasive plant species of temperate Europe and 193 exotic plants which have failed to establish themselves in Switzerland. The overall accuracy was 65%. Accuracy of correctly predicting invasive species was 77%, while accuracy of correctly predicting non-invasive species was 62%. The proposed risk assessment protocol should be understood as a first attempt for a European country and needs modifications. These can only be achieved by applying the system in practice.

[1]  David A. Andow,et al.  Pathways-based risk assessment of exotic species invasions. , 2003 .

[2]  M. Williamson,et al.  A survey of differing views of weed classification: implications for regulation of introductions , 1992 .

[3]  W. M. Lonsdale,et al.  When to Ignore Advice: Invasion Predictions and Decision Theory , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[4]  Alastair H. Fitter,et al.  The ecological flora database. , 1994 .

[5]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions , 1998 .

[6]  P. Vitousek,et al.  INTRODUCED SPECIES: A SIGNIFICANT COMPONENT OF HUMAN-CAUSED GLOBAL CHANGE , 1997 .

[7]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States , 2000 .

[8]  An eradication plan for plant invasions. , 1989 .

[9]  E. Jäger,et al.  Vergleichende chorologie der zentraleuropaischen flora , 1993 .

[10]  F. D. Panetta,et al.  Predicting the Australian Weed Status of Southern African Plants , 1993 .

[11]  R. Schmid,et al.  World Weeds: Natural Histories and Distribution , 1997 .

[12]  R. Westbrooks.  Plant Protection Issues. I. A Commentary on New Weeds in the United States , 1991, Weed Technology.

[13]  T. Barkley,et al.  A Geographical Atlas of World Weeds , 1980 .

[14]  E. Weber.  Invasive Plant Species of the World: A reference guide to environmental weeds , 2017 .

[15]  R. Fuller,et al.  The spread and development of Rhododendron ponticum L. on dunes at Winterton, Norfolk, in comparison with invasion by Hippophaë rhamnoides L. at Saltfleetby, Lincolnshire , 1977 .

[16]  F. Panetta.  A system of assessing proposed plant introductions for weed potential. , 1993 .

[17]  P. Pheloung,et al.  Predicting the weed potential of plant introductions. , 1996 .

[18]  C. Daehler.  The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: Ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds , 1998 .

[19]  I. Kowarik,et al.  PLANT INVASIONS IN NORTHERN GERMANY: HUMAN PERCEPTION AND RESPONSE , 1998 .

[20]  D. Richardson,et al.  An expert system for screening potentially invasive alien plants in South African fynbos , 1995 .

[21]  Richard M. Cowling,et al.  Assessing the risk of invasive success in Pinus and Banksia in South African mountain fynbos , 1990 .

[22]  Sarah H. Reichard,et al.  Predicting Invasions of Woody Plants Introduced into North America , 1997, Conservation Biology.

[23]  K. S. Smallwood,et al.  A rating system for potential exotic bird and mammal pests , 1992 .

[24]  Norway,et al.  Invasive species and biodiversity management , 1999 .