Signal peptides: exquisitely designed transport promoters

Prokaryotic proteins destined for transport out of the cytoplasm typically contain an N‐terminal extension sequence, called the signal peptide, which is required for export, it is evident that many secretory proteins utilize a common export system, yet the signal sequences themselves display very little primary sequence homology. in attempting to understand how different signal peptides are able to promote protein secretion through the same pathway, the physical features of natural signal sequences have been extensively examined for similarities that might play a part in function. Experimental data have confirmed statistical analyses which highlighted dominant features of natural signal sequences in Escherichia coli: a net positive charge in the N‐terminus increases efficiency of transport; the core region must maintain a threshold level of hydrophoblcity within a range of length limitations; the central portion adopts an α‐hellcal conformation in hydrophobic environments; and the signal cleavage region is ideally six residues long, with small side‐chain amino acids in the −1 and −3 positions. This review focuses on the parallels between signal peptide physical features and their functions, which emerge when the results of a variety of experimental approaches are combined. The requirement for each property may be ascribed to a potential interaction that is critical for efficient protein export. The summation of the key physical features produces signal peptides with the flexibility to function in multiple roles in order to expedite secretion. In this way, nature has indeed evolved exquisitely tuned signal sequences.

[1]  M. Chou,et al.  Titration of protein transport activity by incremental changes in signal peptide hydrophobicity. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[2]  R. Jain,et al.  Signal peptide cleavage regions. Functional limits on length and topological implications. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[3]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Large differences in the helix propensities of alanine and glycine , 1991, Nature.

[4]  J. Killian,et al.  Anionic phospholipids are essential for alpha-helix formation of the signal peptide of prePhoE upon interaction with phospholipid vesicles. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[5]  B. Kruijff,et al.  Phosphatidylglycerol dependent protein translocation across the Escherichia coli inner membrane is inhibited by the anti‐cancer drug doxorubicin , 1993, FEBS letters.

[6]  W. Wickner The assembly of proteins into biological membranes: The membrane trigger hypothesis. , 1979, Annual review of biochemistry.

[7]  S. Emr,et al.  Importance of secondary structure in the signal sequence for protein secretion. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  M. Inouye,et al.  A positive residue in the hydrophobic core of the Escherichia coli lipoprotein signal peptide suppresses the secretion defect caused by an acidic amino terminus. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[9]  T. Silhavy,et al.  Kinetic analysis of lamB mutants suggests the signal sequence plays multiple roles in protein export. , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[10]  A. Driessen,et al.  The enzymology of protein translocation across the Escherichia coli plasma membrane. , 1991, Annual review of biochemistry.

[11]  L. Gierasch,et al.  Comparison of helix stability in wild-type and mutant LamB signal sequences. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  M. Inouye,et al.  Secretion and membrane localization of proteins in Escherichia coli. , 1980, CRC critical reviews in biochemistry.

[13]  M E Watson,et al.  Compilation of published signal sequences. , 1984, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  Gunnar von Heijne,et al.  Trans‐membrane Translocation of Proteins , 1979 .

[15]  T. Silhavy,et al.  Genetic analysis of protein export in Escherichia coli K12. , 1985, Annual review of biochemistry.

[16]  J. Rizo,et al.  Conformational behavior of Escherichia coli OmpA signal peptides in membrane mimetic environments. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[17]  K. M. Dolan,et al.  Azide-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli alter the SecA protein, an azide-sensitive component of the protein export machinery. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  R. Brasseur,et al.  Characterization of the interfacial behavior and structure of the signal sequence of Escherichia coli outer membrane pore protein PhoE. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[19]  A. Driessen,et al.  Bacterial protein translocation: kinetic and thermodynamic role of ATP and the protonmotive force. , 1992, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[20]  E. Kaiser,et al.  A comparative analysis of single‐ and multiple‐residue substitutions in the alkaline phosphatase signal peptide , 1990, Biopolymers.

[21]  M. Inouye,et al.  The differential effect on two hybrid proteins of deletion mutations within the hydrophobic region of the Escherichia coli OmpA signal peptide. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[22]  M. Inouye,et al.  Signal peptide mutants ofEscherichia coli , 1990, Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes.

[23]  D A Kendall,et al.  A functional decaisoleucine-containing signal sequence. Construction by cassette mutagenesis. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[24]  C. Deber,et al.  Peptide environment specifies conformation. Helicity of hydrophobic segments compared in aqueous, organic, and membrane environments. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[25]  M. Cascio,et al.  Evaluation of methods for the prediction of membrane protein secondary structures. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  B. Austen,et al.  Predicted secondary structures of amino‐terminal extension sequences of secreted proteins , 1979, FEBS letters.

[27]  P. Bassford,et al.  The folding properties of the Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein influence its interaction with SecB in vitro , 1990, Journal of bacteriology.

[28]  D A Kendall,et al.  Transport of an export-defective protein by a highly hydrophobic signal peptide. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[29]  B. Geller Energy requirements for protein translocation across the Escherichia coli inner membrane , 1991, Molecular microbiology.

[30]  S. Mizushima,et al.  In vitro biochemical studies on translocation of presecretory proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli. , 1991, Methods in cell biology.

[31]  L. Randall,et al.  A kinetic partitioning model of selective binding of nonnative proteins by the bacterial chaperone SecB. , 1991, Science.

[32]  R. S. Osborne,et al.  PrlA suppressor mutations cluster in regions corresponding to three distinct topological domains. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[33]  R. Deber,et al.  Amino acid composition of the membrane and aqueous domains of integral membrane proteins. , 1986, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[34]  D A Kendall,et al.  Signal sequences containing multiple aromatic residues. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Protein folding in the cell , 1992, Nature.

[36]  Y. Fujiyoshi,et al.  Functional signal peptide reduces bilayer thickness of phosphatidylcholine liposomes. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[37]  N R Kallenbach,et al.  Alpha-helix stabilization by natural and unnatural amino acids with alkyl side chains. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  M. Akita,et al.  SecA interacts with secretory proteins by recognizing the positive charge at the amino terminus of the signal peptide in Escherichia coli. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[39]  William F. DeGrado,et al.  How calmodulin binds its targets: sequence independent recognition of amphiphilic α-helices , 1990 .

[40]  L L Randall,et al.  Role of the leader peptide of maltose-binding protein in two steps of the export process , 1988, Journal of bacteriology.

[41]  D. Kendall,et al.  Signal peptide hydrophobicity is finely tailored for function , 1994, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[42]  M. Inouye,et al.  Signal peptidases recognize a structural feature at the cleavage site of secretory proteins. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[43]  K. Ito,et al.  Determinants of the quantity of the stable SecY complex in the Escherichia coli cell , 1993, Journal of bacteriology.

[44]  G A Laforet,et al.  Functional limits of conformation, hydrophobicity, and steric constraints in prokaryotic signal peptide cleavage regions. Wild type transport by a simple polymeric signal sequence. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[45]  A. Kuhn,et al.  Use of site-directed mutagenesis to define the limits of sequence variation tolerated for processing of the M13 procoat protein by the Escherichia coli leader peptidase. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[46]  T. Silhavy,et al.  The E. coli ffh gene is necessary for viability and efficient protein export , 1992, Nature.

[47]  Jeffrey D. Jones,et al.  Biophysical studies of signal peptides: Implications for signal sequence functions and the involvement of lipid in protein export , 1990, Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes.

[48]  T. Steitz,et al.  The spontaneous insertion of proteins into and across membranes: The helical hairpin hypothesis , 1981, Cell.

[49]  J. Beckwith,et al.  A signal sequence is not required for protein export in prlA mutants of Escherichia coli. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[50]  P. Bassford,et al.  Export of maltose-binding protein species with altered charge distribution surrounding the signal peptide hydrophobic core in Escherichia coli cells harboring prl suppressor mutations , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[51]  G. von Heijne,et al.  A signal peptide with a proline next to the cleavage site inhibits leader peptidase when present in a sec‐independent protein , 1992, FEBS letters.

[52]  J. Tommassen,et al.  The role of the positively charged N-terminus of the signal sequence of E. coli outer membrane protein PhoE in export. , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[53]  J. Knowles,et al.  Signal sequence mutants of beta-lactamase. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[54]  J. Gordon,et al.  Structural features in the NH2-terminal region of a model eukaryotic signal peptide influence the site of its cleavage by signal peptidase. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[55]  L. Gierasch,et al.  Functional and nonfunctional LamB signal sequences can be distinguished by their biophysical properties. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[56]  M. Inouye,et al.  In vivo effect of asparagine in the hydrophobic region of the signal sequence. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[57]  V. Bankaitis,et al.  Intragenic suppressor mutations that restore export of maltose binding protein with a truncated signal peptide , 1984, Cell.

[58]  P. Y. Chou,et al.  Empirical predictions of protein conformation. , 1978, Annual review of biochemistry.

[59]  B. Kruijff,et al.  Lipid involvement in protein translocation in Escherichia coli , 1990, Molecular microbiology.

[60]  L. Gierasch,et al.  Conformations of signal peptides induced by lipids suggest initial steps in protein export. , 1986, Science.

[61]  D Perlman,et al.  A putative signal peptidase recognition site and sequence in eukaryotic and prokaryotic signal peptides. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[62]  C. Hikita,et al.  Effects of total hydrophobicity and length of the hydrophobic domain of a signal peptide on in vitro translocation efficiency. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[63]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Signal sequences: The limits of variation , 1985 .

[64]  J. Tommassen,et al.  Phosphatidylglycerol is involved in protein translocation across Escherichia coli inner membranes , 1988, Nature.

[65]  S. Inouye,et al.  Effects of the complete removal of basic amino acid residues from the signal peptide on secretion of lipoprotein in Escherichia coli. , 1983, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[66]  D. Hoyt,et al.  Hydrophobic content and lipid interactions of wild-type and mutant OmpA signal peptides correlate with their in vivo function. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[67]  K. Nishiyama,et al.  A novel membrane protein involved in protein translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[68]  L. Gierasch,et al.  Fluorescence analysis of tryptophan-containing variants of the LamB signal sequence upon insertion into a lipid bilayer. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[69]  L. Gierasch,et al.  The chaperonin GroEL binds a polypeptide in an alpha-helical conformation. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[70]  S. Inouye,et al.  Role of positive charge on the amino-terminal region of the signal peptide in protein secretion across the membrane. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[71]  G Schneider,et al.  Analysis of cleavage-site patterns in protein precursor sequences with a perceptron-type neural network. , 1993, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[72]  D. Oliver SecA protein: autoregulated ATPase catalysing preprotein insertion and translocation across the Escherichia coli inner membrane , 1993, Molecular microbiology.

[73]  J. Fikes,et al.  Analysis of mutational alterations in the hydrophilic segment of the maltose-binding protein signal peptide , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[74]  C. C. Tomich,et al.  Isolation and analysis of novel mutants of Escherichia coli prlA (secY) , 1993, Journal of bacteriology.

[75]  D. Tollervey,et al.  Signal-sequence recognition by an Escherichia coli ribonucleoprotein complex , 1992, Nature.

[76]  S. Mizushima,et al.  The requirement of a positive charge at the amino terminus can be compensated for by a longer central hydrophobic stretch in the functioning of signal peptides. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[77]  Gunnar von Heijne,et al.  Net N-C charge imbalance may be important for signal sequence function in bacteria , 1986 .

[78]  Jon Beckwith,et al.  The role of charged amino acids in the localization of secreted and membrane proteins , 1990, Cell.

[79]  J. Fikes,et al.  Maturation of Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein by signal peptidase I in vivo. Sequence requirements for efficient processing and demonstration of an alternate cleavage site. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[80]  A. Kuhn,et al.  Conserved residues of the leader peptide are essential for cleavage by leader peptidase. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[81]  L. Gierasch,et al.  Helix formation and stability in a signal sequence. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[82]  Susan Clark Bock,et al.  Idealization of the hydrophobic segment of the alkaline phosphatase signal peptide , 1986, Nature.

[83]  Gunnar von Heijne,et al.  How signal sequences maintain cleavage specificity. , 1984 .

[84]  G. A. Barkocy-Gallagher,et al.  Synthesis of precursor maltose-binding protein with proline in the +1 position of the cleavage site interferes with the activity of Escherichia coli signal peptidase I in vivo. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[85]  S. Inouye,et al.  Effects of replacing serine and threonine residues within the signal peptide on the secretion of the major outer membrane lipoprotein of Escherichia coli. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[86]  M. Inouye,et al.  Enhancement of protein translocation across the membrane by specific mutations in the hydrophobic region of the signal peptide , 1990, Journal of bacteriology.

[87]  B. de Kruijff,et al.  OmpF-Lpp signal sequence mutants with varying charge hydrophobicity ratios provide evidence for a phosphatidylglycerol-signal sequence interaction during protein translocation across the Escherichia coli inner membrane. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[88]  J. Fikes,et al.  Novel secA alleles improve export of maltose-binding protein synthesized with a defective signal peptide , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[89]  G. Heijne Membrane protein structure prediction. Hydrophobicity analysis and the positive-inside rule. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[90]  Koreaki Ito SecY and integral membrane components of the Escherichia coli protein translocation system , 1992, Molecular microbiology.

[91]  Y. Fujita,et al.  SecD is involved in the release of translocated secretory proteins from the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[92]  G. Heijne Chapter 4 Structural and Thermodynamic Aspects of the Transfer of Proteins into and across Membranes , 1985 .

[93]  L. Gansheroff,et al.  New suppressors of signal-sequence mutations, prlG, are linked tightly to the secE gene of Escherichia coli. , 1989, Genes & development.

[94]  L. Gierasch,et al.  Exploring the conformational roles of signal sequences: synthesis and conformational analysis of lambda receptor protein wild-type and mutant signal peptides. , 1984, Biochemistry.

[95]  B. de Kruijff,et al.  A dual role for phosphatidylglycerol in protein translocation across the Escherichia coli inner membrane. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[96]  G von Heijne,et al.  Species‐specific variation in signal peptide design Implications for protein secretion in foreign hosts , 1989, FEBS letters.

[97]  M. Chou,et al.  Polymeric sequences reveal a functional interrelationship between hydrophobicity and length of signal peptides. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[98]  C. Kumamoto,et al.  prlA suppression of defective export of maltose-binding protein in secB mutants of Escherichia coli , 1993, Journal of bacteriology.

[99]  J. Joly,et al.  The SecA and SecY subunits of translocase are the nearest neighbors of a translocating preprotein, shielding it from phospholipids. , 1993, The EMBO journal.