Specification and Acceptance Testing of Computed Tomography Scanners

DISCLAIMER: This publication is based on sources and information believed to be reliable, but the AAPM and the editors disclaim any warranty or liability based on or relating to the contents of this publication. The AAPM does not endorse any products, manufacturers or suppliers. Nothing in this publication should be interpreted as implying such endorsement. ©1993 by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the publisher. The Computed Tomography (CT) Scanner Task Group was formed to provide a reference document of suggested procedures for acceptance testing of CT systems for clinical medical physicists. The AAPM first addressed performance testing of CT systems with the publication of AAPM Report No. 1, " Phantoms for Performance Evaluation and Quality Assurance of CT Scanners ". Since publication of Report No. 1 in 1977, CT system designs have evolved and research has improved our understanding of principles and limitations of CT systems. These changes in technology and our understanding of them prompted the formation of this task group. This report is intended to be a source of acceptance testing procedures, as well as an educational tool for those medical physicists whose primary responsibilities lie in areas other than diagnostic imaging. In addition to acceptance testing procedures, the related issues of specification writing and radiation shielding design are also discussed.

[1]  R. J. Kriz,et al.  An Investigation Of Computed Tomography (CT) Linearity , 1985, Medical Imaging.

[2]  M. V. Yester,et al.  Geometrical Limitations Of Computed Tomography (CT) Scanner Resolution , 1977, Other Conferences.

[3]  J J Spokas,et al.  Dose descriptors for computed tomography. , 1982, Medical physics.

[4]  R G Swensson,et al.  Display thresholding of images and observer detection performance. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  S M Bentzen,et al.  Evaluation of the spatial resolution of a CT scanner by direct analysis of the edge response function. , 1983, Medical physics.

[6]  Mitchell M. Goodsitt,et al.  Standardized Methods for Measuring Diagnostic X-Ray Exposures , 1990 .

[7]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES OF VERTEBRAL MINERAL USING QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. , 1982 .

[8]  A Hemmingsson,et al.  Ellipsoidal Body Phantom for Evaluation of CT Scanners , 1983, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  R L Morin,et al.  A practical method to measure the MTF of CT scanners. , 1982, Medical physics.

[10]  E L Nickoloff,et al.  A simplified approach for modulation transfer function determinations in computed tomography. , 1985, Medical physics.

[11]  Raymond P. Rossi,et al.  Performance Specifications and Acceptance Testing for X-Ray Generators and Automatic Exposure Control Devices , 1985 .

[12]  S C Bushong,et al.  Diagnostic X-ray shielding design based on an empirical model of photon attenuation. , 1983, Health physics.

[13]  D. R. White,et al.  Radiation dosimetry survey of computed tomography systems from ten manufacturers. , 1982, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  K. G. Lisk,et al.  Test pattern for video displays and hard-copy cameras. , 1985, Radiology.

[15]  Diagnostic X-ray systems and their major components; amendments to performance standard: final rule. , 1979, Federal register.

[16]  F A DiBianca,et al.  The Use of Contrast‐Detail‐Dose Evaluation of Image Quality in a Computed Tomographic Scanner , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  P. Judy,et al.  The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner. , 1976, Medical physics.

[18]  A Suzuki,et al.  Use of a pencil-shaped ionization chamber for measurement of exposure resulting from a computed tomography scan. , 1978, Medical physics.

[19]  G H Glover,et al.  Compton scatter effects in CT reconstructions. , 1983, Medical physics.

[20]  T N Hangartner Correction of scatter in computed tomography images of bone. , 1987, Medical physics.

[21]  D J Simpkin,et al.  Shielding requirements for constant-potential diagnostic x-ray beams determined by a Monte Carlo calculation. , 1989, Health physics.