Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration exercise

Rabin (Econometrica 68(5):1281–1292, 2000) argues that, under expected-utility, observed risk aversion over modest stakes implies extremely high risk aversion over large stakes. Cox and Sadiraj (Games Econom. Behav. 56(1):45–60, 2006) have replied that this is a problem of expected-utility of wealth, but that expected-utility of income does not share that problem. We combine experimental data on moderate-scale risky choices with survey data on income to estimate coefficients of relative risk aversion using expected-utility of consumption. Assuming individuals cannot save implies an average coefficient of relative risk aversion of 1.92. Assuming they can decide between consuming today and saving for the future, a realistic assumption, implies quadruple-digit coefficients. This gives empirical evidence for narrow bracketing.

[1]  R. Thaler,et al.  Anomalies: Risk Aversion , 2001 .

[2]  M. Rabin.  Risk Aversion and Expected Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem , 2000 .

[3]  Kfir Eliaz,et al.  Comments on the Risk and Time Preferences in Economics , 2002 .

[4]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Estimating Risk Preferences from Deductible Choice , 2007 .

[5]  R. Thaler,et al.  Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle , 1993 .

[6]  Robert H. Gertner.  Game Shows and Economic Behavior: Risk-Taking on “Card Sharks” , 1993 .

[7]  Daniel Read,et al.  Choice Bracketing , 1999 .

[8]  Laura Schechter,et al.  Traditional Trust Measurement and the Risk Confound: An Experiment in Rural Paraguay , 2007 .

[9]  Donald J. Meyer,et al.  Relative Risk Aversion: What Do We Know? , 2005 .

[10]  Richard Watt.  Defending Expected Utility Theory: Comment , 2002 .

[11]  M. Rabin,et al.  A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences , 2006 .

[12]  Richard J. Zeckhauser,et al.  Another Type of Risk Aversion , 1970 .

[13]  H. P. Binswanger.  Attitudes toward Risk: Theoretical Implications of an Experiment in Rural India , 1981 .

[14]  Ignacio Palacios-Huerta,et al.  Rejecting small gambles under expected utility , 2006 .

[15]  David Laibson,et al.  Commentary on “Choice Bracketing” by Read, Loewenstein and Rabin , 1999 .

[16]  Christian Gollier,et al.  Risk Vulnerability and the temper-ing E ect of Background Risk , 1996 .

[17]  B. Melenberg,et al.  Estimating Risk Attitudes using Lotteries: A Large Sample Approach , 1999 .

[18]  R. Mehra,et al.  THE EQUITY PREMIUM A Puzzle , 1985 .

[19]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking , 1993 .

[20]  H. Binswanger-Mkhize,et al.  Attitudes toward Risk: Theoretical Implications of an Experiment in Rural India , 1981 .

[21]  A. Mas-Colell,et al.  Microeconomic Theory , 1995 .

[22]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Behavioural Development Economics: Lessons from Field Labs in the Developing World , 2008 .

[23]  D. L. Hanson,et al.  ON THE THEORY OF RISK AVERSION , 1970 .

[24]  KahnemanDaniel,et al.  Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts , 1993 .

[25]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  A Dual Self Model of Impulse Control , 2004, The American economic review.

[26]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[27]  James C. Cox,et al.  Small- and Large-Stakes Risk Aversion: Implications of Concavity Calibration for Decision Theory , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[28]  Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle - The Impact of Probability Weighting on Prospective Utility , 2007 .

[29]  Liu Yu-li,et al.  Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium , 2003 .