Comparison of light scattering models for diffuse optical tomography.

We reconstruct images of the absorption and the scattering coefficients for diffuse optical tomography using five different models for light propagation in tissues: (1) the radiative transport equation, (2) the delta-Eddington approximation, (3) the Fokker-Planck approximation, (4) the Fokker-Planck-Eddington approximation and (5) the generalized Fokker-Planck-Eddington approximation. The last four models listed are approximations of the radiative transport equation that take into account forward-peaked scattering analytically. Using simulated data from the numerical solution of radiative transport equation, we solve the inverse problem for the absorption and scattering coefficients using the transport-backtransport method. Through comparison of the numerical results, we show that all of these light scattering models produce good image reconstructions. In addition, we show that these approximations afford considerable computational savings over solving the radiative transport equation. However, all of the models exhibit significant "cross-talk" between absorption and scattering coefficient images. Among the approximations, we have found that the generalized Fokker-Planck-Eddington equation produced the best image reconstructions in comparison with the image reconstructions produced by the radiative transport equation.

[1]  Manuel Kindelan,et al.  History matching problem in reservoir engineering using the propagation–backpropagation method , 2005 .

[2]  O Dorn,et al.  Scattering and absorption transport sensitivity functions for optical tomography. , 2000, Optics express.

[3]  Simon Arridge,et al.  Anisotropic effects in highly scattering media. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Matthias Vögeler,et al.  Reconstruction of the three-dimensional refractive index in electromagnetic scattering by using a propagation-backpropagation method , 2003 .

[5]  A. D. Fokker.  Die mittlere Energie rotierender elektrischer Dipole im Strahlungsfeld , 1914 .

[6]  Arnold D Kim,et al.  Light propagation in biological tissue , 2003, SPIE BiOS.

[7]  E. Haber,et al.  On optimization techniques for solving nonlinear inverse problems , 2000 .

[8]  E. Miller,et al.  A shape reconstruction method for electromagnetic tomography using adjoint fields and level sets , 2000 .

[9]  F. Natterer,et al.  A propagation-backpropagation method for ultrasound tomography , 1995 .

[10]  Pedro González-Rodríguez,et al.  Light propagation in tissues with forward-peaked and large-angle scattering. , 2008, Applied optics.

[11]  S R Arridge,et al.  Recent advances in diffuse optical imaging , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  J. Joseph,et al.  The delta-Eddington approximation for radiative flux transfer , 1976 .

[13]  Oliver Dorn,et al.  Fréchet Derivatives for Some Bilinear Inverse Problems , 2002, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[14]  Oliver Dorn,et al.  A transport-backtransport method for optical tomography , 1998 .

[15]  S. Arridge.  Optical tomography in medical imaging , 1999 .