Incorporating Learning Over Time into the Cognitive Assessment Framework

We propose a variety of models for incorporating learning over time into the cognitive assessment modeling framework. In two of the models, we use Item Response Theory (IRT; VanDerLinden and Hambleton 1997) where we assume that a continuous latent parameter measures a student’s general proficiency in the area of interest. In the other two models, we use Cognitive Diagnosis Models (CDMs; Rupp and Templin 2008) where we estimate whether students possess a set of skills as the latent student parameter. In all four models, we assume that students take multiple exams in the same content area over a period of time and that at each time point, we are interested in tracking their learning. Therefore, the models consider what the students knew at the previous time point when estimating their current knowledge. With this information, we believe we can make better predictions about end of year, high-stakes exam scores and inform teachers of areas where students are struggling. We may also be able to compare different methods of teaching to find ones that most promote learning and make some statements about the true rate and variability with which students learn which could help teachers, researchers, and policy makers set more realistic goals for students. Each model is discussed both empirically and mathematically. In a simulation study of one model, the parameters describing student learning were recovered with 94.6% accuracy.

[1]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  An Open Repository and analysis tools for fine-grained, longitudinal learner data , 2008, EDM.

[2]  Tiffany Barnes,et al.  The Q-matrix Method: Mining Student Response Data for Knowledge , 2005 .

[3]  J. Bransford How people learn , 2000 .

[4]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Performance Factors Analysis - A New Alternative to Knowledge Tracing , 2009, AIED.

[5]  Jeffrey A Douglas,et al.  Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis , 2004 .

[6]  Deborah J. Harris Comparison of 1-, 2-, and 3-Parameter IRT Models , 1989 .

[7]  E. Maris Estimating multiple classification latent class models , 1999 .

[8]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[9]  Elizabeth Ayers,et al.  IRT Modeling of Tutor Performance to Predict End-of-Year Exam Scores , 2008 .

[10]  Larry Wasserman,et al.  All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference , 2004 .

[11]  Stuart Barber,et al.  All of Statistics: a Concise Course in Statistical Inference , 2005 .

[12]  Johan H. L. Oud,et al.  Monitoring pupil development by means of the kalman filter and smoother based upon SEM state space modeling , 1998 .

[13]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[14]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[15]  J. Connor Multivariate mixture models to describe longitudinal patterns of frailty in American seniors , 2006 .

[16]  Sharon M. Carver Cognition and instruction: Enriching the laboratory school experience of children, teachers, parents, and undergraduates , 2001 .

[17]  Kathryn Roeder,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty in Latent Class Membership: A Case Study in Criminology , 1999 .

[18]  Lynne Steuerle Schofield Using Cognitive Test Scores in Social Science Research , 2007 .

[19]  Donald Hedeker,et al.  Generalized Linear Mixed Models , 2005 .

[20]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[21]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[22]  H.L.J. van der Maas,et al.  An IRT Model with a Parameter-Driven Process for Change , 2005 .

[23]  C. Dethlefsen,et al.  Formulating State Space Models in R with Focus on Longitudinal Regression Models , 2006 .

[24]  R. J. Mokken,et al.  Handbook of modern item response theory , 1997 .

[25]  Siem Jan Koopman,et al.  Time Series Analysis of Non-Gaussian Observations Based on State Space Models from Both Classical and Bayesian Perspectives , 1999 .

[26]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Student modeling in the ACT Programming Tutor. , 1995 .

[27]  Ronald K. Hambleton,et al.  Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. , 1997 .

[28]  Paul De Boeck,et al.  Latent Class Models for Diary Method Data: Parameter Estimation by Local Computations , 2007, Psychometrika.

[29]  J. Verkuilen Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach by P. de Boeck and M. Wilson and Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal and Structural Equation Models by A. Skrondal and S. Rabe-Hesketh , 2006, Psychometrika.

[30]  P. Holland On the sampling theory roundations of item response theory models , 1990 .

[31]  David Thissen,et al.  A taxonomy of item response models , 1986 .

[32]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  On measurement properties of continuation ratio models , 2001 .

[33]  B. Junker Some statistical models and computational methods that may be useful for cognitively-relevant assessment , 1999 .

[34]  Edward H. Haertel Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items , 1989 .

[35]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of An On-Line Formative Assessment and Tutoring System , 2010 .

[36]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Learning Factors Analysis - A General Method for Cognitive Model Evaluation and Improvement , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[37]  Brian W. Junker,et al.  Investigating the utility of a conjunctive model in Q-matrix assessment using monthly student records in an online tutoring system , 2007 .

[38]  J. Templin,et al.  Unique Characteristics of Diagnostic Classification Models: A Comprehensive Review of the Current State-of-the-Art , 2008 .

[39]  B. Junker,et al.  Cognitive Assessment Models with Few Assumptions, and Connections with Nonparametric Item Response Theory , 2001 .

[40]  Georg Rasch,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests , 1981, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[41]  Sarah M. Hartz,et al.  A Bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practicality. , 2002 .

[42]  Ajay Jasra,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods and the Label Switching Problem in Bayesian Mixture Modeling , 2005 .

[43]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  Using Learning Decomposition to Analyze Instructional Effectiveness in the ASSISTment System , 2009, AIED.

[44]  C. Mitchell Dayton,et al.  The Use of Probabilistic Models in the Assessment of Mastery , 1977 .

[45]  Maaa,et al.  Trajectories of Morbidity, Disability, and Mortality among the U.S. Elderly Population , 2013 .

[46]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  Addressing the testing challenge with a web-based e-assessment system that tutors as it assesses , 2006, WWW '06.