Three laws of energy transitions

The paper formulates and explores a hypothesis on three general energy transition laws: the law of stable long-term energy costs to income ratio; the law of improving energy quality; and the law of growing energy productivity. These laws are essential for shaping long-term projections and checking for their consistency. All three are rooted in amazingly stable in time and universal across countries energy costs to income ratios. Limited energy purchasing power sets up thresholds, which, if exceeded, bring asymmetry to energy demand to price elasticity. The author believes, that the theoretical postulate on the substantial substitution among production factors, which is used in the production functions theory, may be incorrect. In reality, innovations mainly lead to the substitution of a low-quality production factor with the same yet of a better-quality. Improving energy quality with stable costs to income ratio is accompanied by growing energy productivity. Energy costs to income thresholds are indicators allowing for better projections of oil prices.

[1]  John Rennie The Uncertainties of Technological Innovation , 1995 .

[2]  M. Togeby,et al.  Industrial companies' demand for electricity: evidence from a micropanel , 2001 .

[3]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Global energy : perspectives , 1998 .

[4]  Keigo Akimoto,et al.  Analysis of Technological Portfolios for C02 Stabilizations and Effects of Technological Changes , 2005 .

[5]  Tarek Ghalwash Energy taxes as a signaling device: An empirical analysis of consumer preferences , 2004 .

[6]  Lynn Price,et al.  Sectoral trends in global energy use and greenhouse gasemissions , 2006 .

[7]  K. Blok,et al.  Household energy requirement and value patterns , 2007 .

[8]  Amulya K. N. Reddy,et al.  Energy for the New Millennium , 2001, Ambio.

[9]  George Kouris,et al.  Elasticities - science or fiction? , 1981 .

[10]  中華人民共和国国家統計局 China statistical yearbook , 1988 .

[11]  Lee Schipper,et al.  Energy Efficiency and Human Activity: Past Trends, Future Prospects , 1992 .

[12]  J. M. Griffin,et al.  Price Asymmetry In Energy Demand Models: A Proxy for Energy-Saving Technical Change? , 2005 .

[13]  Michael Grubb,et al.  The Transition to Endogenous Technical Change in Climate-Economy Models: A Technical Overview to the Innovation Modeling Comparison Project , 2006 .

[14]  P H Abelson,et al.  Energy for the future. , 1966, Science.

[15]  The energy demand in the manufacturing sector of Pakistan: some further results , 2000 .

[16]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Sectoral trends in global energy use and greenhouse gasemissions , 2006 .

[17]  Judith Gurney BP Statistical Review of World Energy , 1985 .

[18]  D. Gately,et al.  The Asymmetric Effects of Changes in Price and Income on Energy and Oil Demand , 2002 .

[19]  W. Labys,et al.  Application of the translog model of energy substitution to developing countries: the case of Korea , 1988 .

[20]  Giovanni Urga,et al.  Dynamic translog and linear logit models: a factor demand analysis of interfuel substitution in US industrial energy demand , 2003 .

[21]  Hillard G. Huntington,et al.  Energy disruptions, interfirm price effects and the aggregate economy , 2003 .

[22]  Heinz Welsch,et al.  The determinants of aggregate energy use in West Germany: factor substitution, technological change, and trade , 2005 .

[23]  S. E. Ireland Energy Prices and Taxes , 2009 .

[24]  José Goldemberg,et al.  Energy as an instrument for socio-economic development , 1995 .

[25]  L. Schipper,et al.  Residential energy demand in OECD-countries and the role of irreversible efficiency improvements , 1998 .

[26]  I. Bashmakov Oil Prices: Limits to Growth and the Depth of Falling , 2006 .

[27]  End Use Annual energy review , 1984 .