Novel Behavioral Paradigm Reveals Lower Temporal Limits on Mouse Olfactory Decisions

Temporal limits on perceptual decisions set strict boundaries on the possible underlying neural computations. How odor information is encoded in the olfactory system is still poorly understood. Here, we sought to define the limit on the speed of olfactory processing. To achieve this, we trained mice to discriminate different odor concentrations in a novel behavioral setup with precise odor delivery synchronized to the sniffing cycle. Mice reported their choice by moving a horizontal treadmill with their front limbs. We found that mice reported discriminations of 75% accuracy in 70–90 ms after odor inhalation. For a low concentration and nontrigeminal odorant, this time was 90–140 ms, showing that mice process odor information rapidly even in the absence of trigeminal stimulation. These response times establish, after accounting for odor transduction and motor delays, that olfactory processing can take tens of milliseconds. This study puts a strong limit on the underlying neural computations and suggests that the action potentials forming the neural basis for these decisions are fired in a few tens of milliseconds. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Understanding how sensory information is processed requires different approaches that span multiple levels of investigation from genes to neurons to behavior. Limits on behavioral performance constrain the possible neural mechanisms responsible for specific computations. Using a novel behavioral paradigm, we established that mice can make decisions about odor intensity surprisingly fast. After accounting for sensory and motor delays, the limit on some olfactory neural computations can be as low as a few tens of milliseconds, which suggests that only the first action potentials across a population of neurons contribute to these computations.

[1]  R. Doty,et al.  Intranasal localizability of odorants: influence of stimulus volume. , 2011, Chemical senses.

[2]  Matthew C Smear,et al.  Perception of sniff phase in mouse olfaction , 2011, Nature.

[3]  B. Fischer,et al.  Saccadic eye movements after extremely short reaction times in the monkey , 1983, Brain Research.

[4]  Z. Mainen,et al.  Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Joshua I. Sanders,et al.  Choice ball: a response interface for two-choice psychometric discrimination in head-fixed mice. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Naoshige Uchida,et al.  Robust Odor Coding via Inhalation-Coupled Transient Activity in the Mammalian Olfactory Bulb , 2010, Neuron.

[7]  T. Finger,et al.  Trigeminal collaterals in the nasal epithelium and olfactory bulb: A potential route for direct modulation of olfactory information by trigeminal stimuli , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  Yoshio Maruyama,et al.  Transcranial optogenetic stimulation for functional mapping of the motor cortex , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  Adam Kepecs,et al.  Seeing at a glance, smelling in a whiff: rapid forms of perceptual decision making , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Changing your mind: a computational mechanism of vacillation , 2009, Nature.

[11]  P. Jurs,et al.  Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: Psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans , 1978, Physiology & Behavior.

[12]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[13]  Naoshige Uchida,et al.  The Limits of Deliberation in a Perceptual Decision Task , 2013, Neuron.

[14]  L. Selen,et al.  Deliberation in the Motor System: Reflex Gains Track Evolving Evidence Leading to a Decision , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Matthew C Smear,et al.  Precise olfactory responses tile the sniff cycle , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Ryan M Carey,et al.  Rapid Encoding and Perception of Novel Odors in the Rat , 2008, PLoS biology.