Effects of combined robotic therapy and repetitive-task practice on upper-extremity function in a patient with chronic stroke.

OBJECTIVE This article describes the effect of a robotic device combined with repetitive-task practice (RTP) on upper-extremity function in a patient with chronic stroke. METHOD The client was a 32-year-old woman, 11 months after stroke, with minimal wrist and finger movement. She received approximately 48 hr of intervention split evenly between a robotic device (Hand Mentor) and RTP during 3 weeks. RESULTS Favorable scores in the Wolf Motor Function Test were observed from pre- to postevaluation. Active range of motion, from pre- to postintervention, increased by 35 degrees in the shoulder, 65 degrees in the wrist, and 70 degrees in the thumb. Kinetic analysis of a bimanual dexterity task indicated improved specification of grasping forces for both limbs. CONCLUSION Improvements in upper-extremity motor functioning and functional performance in daily tasks followed this client's engagement in distal initiation of movement during an RTP exercise regimen that was robotically reinforced.

[1]  G. E. Stelmach,et al.  Prehension with trunk assisted reaching , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[2]  E. Taub,et al.  The EXCITE Trial: Attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Patients with Subacute Stroke , 2005, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[3]  S. Wolf,et al.  The Effects of Constraint-Induced Therapy on Precision Grip: A Preliminary Study , 2004, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[4]  Wendy M Murray,et al.  The unoperated hand: the role of passive forces in hand function after tetraplegia. , 2002, Hand clinics.

[5]  M. Leathley,et al.  Reliability of the Tone Assessment Scale and the modified Ashworth scale as clinical tools for assessing poststroke spasticity. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[7]  E. Taub,et al.  The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  S. Page,et al.  Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy: A Promising Restorative Outpatient Therapy , 2004, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[9]  Margaret A. Finley,et al.  Short-duration robotic therapy in stroke patients with severe upper-limb motor impairment. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  S. Wolf,et al.  Repetitive Task Practice: A Critical Review of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Stroke , 2002, The neurologist.

[11]  T D Cahalan,et al.  The relationship between wrist position, grasp size, and grip strength. , 1992, The Journal of hand surgery.

[12]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. , 1999, Stroke.

[13]  G. Stelmach,et al.  The co-ordination and phasing of a bilateral prehension task. The influence of Parkinson's disease. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[15]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[16]  C. Winstein,et al.  A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.