Do prominent warnings make packaging less attractive?

Abstract Despite the importance of packaging attractiveness in product perception, limited research was done on the possible effects of warning messages on the packaging’s visual appeal. Our study investigated the attractiveness of the packaging with prominent and non-prominent warning pictograms. Before this, prominent design properties (i.e. large size and thick lines), which make pictograms highly noticeable, were identified by eye-tracking measurements. The packaging samples were designed especially for the purpose of the study. The results showed that large and thick pictograms were noticed more quickly than small and thin pictograms, and this did not affect people’s perception of the packaging’s attractiveness. Our findings encourage manufacturers to use highly noticeable pictograms in order to increase the likelihood of being detected more easily by the users. This is an important step closer to proper handling of the product.

[1]  Ruth Mugge,et al.  Judging a product by its cover: Packaging sustainability and perceptions of quality in food products , 2016 .

[2]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Alcohol Beverage Warnings in Print Advertisements , 1991 .

[3]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Chapter 23 – Eye Tracking in Usability Evaluation: A Practitioner's Guide , 2003 .

[4]  Ingrid M. Martin,et al.  Intended and Unintended Consequences of Warning Messages: A Review and Synthesis of Empirical Research , 1994 .

[5]  Michael L. Ursic RESEARCH NOTE, The Impact of Safety Warnings on Perception and Memory , 1984 .

[6]  Ian C. MacGregor,et al.  Fragranced consumer products: Chemicals emitted, ingredients unlisted , 2011 .

[7]  Kenneth R. Laughery,et al.  The Biasing Effects of Product Familiarity on Consumers' Awareness of Hazard , 1984 .

[8]  Melika Husic-Mehmedovic,et al.  Seeing is not necessarily liking: Advancing research on package design with eye-tracking ☆ , 2017 .

[9]  Iris Vilnai-Yavetz,et al.  Cutting through the clutter: purchase intentions as a function of packaging instrumentality, aesthetics, and symbolism , 2013 .

[10]  Wilmot Li,et al.  Design principles for visual communication , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[11]  Joseph B. Sala,et al.  Product warnings and the involuntary capture of attention , 2015 .

[12]  U. Orth,et al.  Healthy by design, but only when in focus: Communicating non-verbal health cues through symbolic meaning in packaging , 2016 .

[13]  William Lidwell,et al.  Universal principles of design : 100 ways to enhance usability,influence perception, increase appeal, make better, designdecisions, and teach through design , 2003 .

[14]  Kenneth R. Laughery,et al.  Effects of Explicitness in Conveying Severity Information in Product Warnings , 1991 .

[15]  Donna L. Cuomo,et al.  Evaluation of a Proposed Space and Missile Warning Symbology Standard for Graphical Displays , 1991 .

[16]  Woo-Sik Jeong,et al.  Characterization of emissions composition for selected household products available in Korea. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[17]  Jacob L. Orquin,et al.  Eye Tracking and Nutrition Label Use: A Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Label Enhancement , 2012 .

[18]  Anja Podlesek,et al.  Eye-tracking Study of Reading Speed from LCD Displays: Influence of Type Style and Type Size , 2015 .

[19]  Jean-Xavier Guinard,et al.  Evaluating bottles and labels versus tasting the oils blind: Effects of packaging and labeling on consumer preferences, purchase intentions and expectations for extra virgin olive oil , 2013 .

[20]  Tom Greenfield,et al.  Knowledge of Warning Labels on Alcoholic Beverage Containers , 1991 .

[21]  N. Clayton Silver,et al.  Likelihood of Reading Warnings: The Effect of Fonts and Font Sizes , 1992 .

[22]  Ulrich R. Orth,et al.  Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength , 2014 .

[23]  Tonya L Smith-Jackson,et al.  Research-based guidelines for warning design and evaluation. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  Judy Edworthy,et al.  Warning design : a research prospective , 1996 .

[25]  Julianne Lee Holmes,et al.  The effect of decorative foil stamping on consumer attention , 2014 .

[26]  Iván Lidón,et al.  The identification of viewing patterns of chocolate snack packages using eye-tracking techniques , 2015 .

[27]  Silvia Wen-Yu Lee,et al.  A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012 , 2013 .

[28]  Jasem M. Alhumoud Evaluation and analysis of household hazardous substances in Kuwait , 2009 .

[29]  M. Parhizgar,et al.  Packaging as Brand Communication: The Impact of Product Display and Advertising Slogan on Consumer's Responses to the Package and Brand , 2014 .

[30]  B L Cole,et al.  What attracts attention when driving? , 1986, Ergonomics.

[31]  Kraig Finstad,et al.  Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: evidence against 5-point scales , 2010 .

[32]  Kent P. Vaubel,et al.  The Noticeability of Warnings on Alcoholic Beverage Containers , 1993 .

[33]  A. Connolly,et al.  How does design affect decision at point of sale? , 1996 .

[34]  Halil Semih Kimzan,et al.  The Effect of Visual Product Aesthetics on Consumers’ Price Sensitivity☆ , 2015 .

[35]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information , 1984 .

[36]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  A heuristic‐systematic processing analysis of the effectiveness of product warning labels , 1998 .

[37]  J. Fiala,et al.  The Effect of Organic Food Labels on Consumer Attention , 2018 .

[38]  D. Krugman Do adolescents attend to warnings in cigarette advertising? An eye-tracking approach , 1994 .

[39]  Dwight J. Peterson,et al.  The Gestalt principle of similarity benefits visual working memory , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Alcoholic Beverage Warnings in Magazine and Television Advertisements , 1993 .

[41]  Henrik Hagtvedt,et al.  Consumer Response to Overstyling: Balancing Aesthetics and Functionality in Product Design , 2014 .

[42]  Kong-King Shieh,et al.  Effects of pictorial size and circle-slash thickness on glance legibility for prohibitive symbols , 2004 .

[43]  David Hammond,et al.  Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review , 2011, Tobacco Control.

[44]  Jeremy J. Sierra,et al.  The Effects of Warning-Label Placement in Print ADS: A Social Contract Perspective , 2007 .

[45]  Edward Shih-Tse Wang The influence of visual packaging design on perceived food product quality, value, and brand preference , 2013 .

[46]  J. Zaichkowsky,et al.  Aesthetic package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation , 2010 .

[47]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  Evaluating the Layout of Graphical User Interface Screens: Validation of a Numerical Computerized Model , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[48]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  A three-stage model summarizes product warning and environmental sign research , 2014 .

[49]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Changing only the aesthetic features of a product can affect its apparent usability , 2007, HOIT.

[50]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Appearance Matters: Neural Correlates of Food Choice and Packaging Aesthetics , 2012, PloS one.

[51]  U. Orth,et al.  Effects of package visuals and haptics on brand evaluations , 2013 .

[52]  Jan Schoormans,et al.  Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern , 2015 .

[53]  Jay Singh,et al.  A mixed‐methods approach for designing market‐driven packaging , 2012 .

[54]  Tao Liu,et al.  Characteristics of warning labels for drug containers and their effects on perceived hazardousness , 2015 .

[55]  Ulrich R. Orth,et al.  Is Beauty in the Aisles of the Retailer? Package Processing in Visually Complex Contexts , 2014 .

[56]  Nadine Karnal,et al.  See how tasty it is? Effects of symbolic cues on product evaluation and taste , 2016 .

[57]  Geoffrey T Fong,et al.  Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: findings from the international tobacco control four country study. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[58]  Kenneth R. Laughery,et al.  An Eye Scan Analysis of Accessing Product Warning Information , 1991 .

[59]  P. Kenning,et al.  What they see is what they get? An fMRI‐study on neural correlates of attractive packaging , 2008 .

[60]  Thomas J. Ayres,et al.  What is a Warning and When Will it Work? , 1989 .

[61]  Marie-Pierre Bruyas,et al.  Ergonomic guidelines for the design of pictorial information , 1998 .

[62]  Monica Trommelen Perceived hazardousness of child-care products and the effectiveness of safety information , 1994 .

[63]  Ulrich R. Orth,et al.  Formation of Consumer Price Expectation Based on Package Design: Attractive and Quality Routes , 2010 .

[64]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  Location matters, especially for non-salient features-An eye-tracking study on the effects of web object placement on different types of websites , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[65]  N. Tractinsky,et al.  What is beautiful is usable , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[66]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Pest-Control Products: Reading Warnings and Purchasing Intentions , 1989 .