CT-measured macropores as affected by agroforestry and grass buffers for grazed pasture systems

Agroforestry and grass buffers have been proposed for improving water quality in watersheds. Soil porosity can be significantly influenced by buffer vegetation which affects water transport and water quality. The objective of the study was to compare differences in computed tomography (CT)-measured macroporosity (>1,000-μm diam.) and coarse mesoporosity (200- to 1,000-μm diam.) parameters for agroforestry and grass buffer systems associated with rotationally grazed and continuously grazed pasture systems. Soils at the site were Menfro silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Hapludalf). Six replicate intact soil cores, 76.2 mm diam. by 76.2 mm long, were collected using a core sampler from the four treatments at five soil depths (0–50 cm at 10-cm intervals). Images were acquired using a hospital CT scanner and subsequently soil bulk density and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) were measured after scanning the cores. Image-J software was used to analyze five equally spaced images from each core. Bulk density was 5.9% higher and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) values were five times lower for pasture treatments relative to buffer treatments. For the 0–10 cm soil depth, CT-measured soil macroporosity (>1,000 μm diam.) was 13 times higher for the buffer treatments compared to the pasture treatments. Buffer treatments had greater macroporosity (0.020 m3 m−3) compared to pasture (0.0045 m3 m−3) treatments. CT-measured pore parameters were positively correlated with Ksat. The project illustrates benefits of agroforestry and grass buffers for maintaining soil porosity critical for soil water and nutrient transport.

[1]  J. Bouma,et al.  Computed tomography as a tool for non-destructive analysis of flow patterns in macroporous clay soils. , 1995 .

[2]  D. H. Phillips,et al.  Measuring physical density with X-ray computed tomography , 1997 .

[3]  Mark R. Lankton,et al.  Assessment of localized deformations in sand using X-ray computed tomography , 2000 .

[4]  C. J. Gantzer,et al.  Computed tomographic measurement of macroporosity in chisel-disk and no-tillage seedbeds , 2002 .

[5]  Chris Moran,et al.  3D reconstruction and quantification of macropores using X-ray computed tomography and image analysis , 2002 .

[6]  H. E. Garrett,et al.  Agroforestry practices, runoff, and nutrient loss: a paired watershed comparison. , 2002, Journal of environmental quality.

[7]  M. Colbert,et al.  Applications of high-resolution X-ray computed tomography in petrology, meteoritics and palaeontology , 2003, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[8]  P. Jacobs,et al.  Applications of X-ray computed tomography in the geosciences , 2003, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[9]  D. Malo,et al.  Porosity and Pore-Size Distribution in Cultivated Ustolls and Usterts , 2004 .

[10]  C. J. Gantzer,et al.  Influence of Grass and Agroforestry Buffer Strips on Soil Hydraulic Properties for an Albaqualf , 2005 .

[11]  Stephen H. Anderson,et al.  Computed‐Tomographic Measurement of Soil Macroporosity Parameters as Affected by Stiff‐Stemmed Grass Hedges , 2005 .

[12]  Harold E. Garrett,et al.  Agroforestry and Grass Buffer Influence on Macropore Characteristics , 2006 .

[13]  James R. Brandle,et al.  Change in filter strip performance over ten years , 2007 .

[14]  S. Anderson,et al.  Soil hydraulic properties influenced by agroforestry and grass buffers for grazed pasture systems , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[15]  Harold E. Garrett,et al.  Agroforestry and Grass Buffer Effects on Pore Characteristics Measured by High‐Resolution X‐ray Computed Tomography , 2008 .

[16]  H. E. Garrett,et al.  Influence of prairie restoration on CT-measured soil pore characteristics. , 2008, Journal of environmental quality.

[17]  C. Dirksen,et al.  Hydraulic Conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory Methods , 2018, SSSA Book Series.