Assessment of automatic exposure control performance in digital mammography using a no-reference anisotropic quality index

Automatic exposure control (AEC) is used in mammography to obtain acceptable radiation dose and adequate image quality regardless of breast thickness and composition. Although there are physics methods for assessing the AEC, it is not clear whether mammography systems operate with optimal dose and image quality in clinical practice. In this work, we propose the use of a normalized anisotropic quality index (NAQI), validated in previous studies, to evaluate the quality of mammograms acquired using AEC. The authors used a clinical dataset that consists of 561 patients and 1,046 mammograms (craniocaudal breast views). The results show that image quality is often maintained, even at various radiation levels (mean NAQI = 0.14 ± 0.02). However, a more careful analysis of NAQI reveals that the average image quality decreases as breast thickness increases. The NAQI is reduced by 32% on average, when the breast thickness increases from 31 to 71 mm. NAQI also decreases with lower breast density. The variation in breast parenchyma alone cannot fully account for the decrease of NAQI with thickness. Examination of images shows that images of large, fatty breasts are often inadequately processed. This work shows that NAQI can be applied in clinical mammograms to assess mammographic image quality, and highlights the limitations of the automatic exposure control for some images.

[1]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Detectors for digital mammography. , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[2]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Tailoring automatic exposure control toward constant detectability in digital mammography. , 2015, Medical physics.

[3]  Janet Allahverdian,et al.  Evaluation of automatic exposure control options in digital mammography. , 2014, Journal of X-ray science and technology.

[4]  Maryann Chorlton,et al.  Digital mammographic artifacts on full-field systems: what are they and how do I fix them? , 2008, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  D R Dance,et al.  SIMULATING LOCAL DENSE AREAS USING PMMA TO ASSESS AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROL IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY. , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[6]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  The Effect of Breast Composition on a No-reference Anisotropic Quality Index for Digital Mammography , 2016, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[7]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Validation of no-reference image quality index for the assessment of digital mammographic images , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  Ioannis Delakis,et al.  Performance evaluation of contrast-detail in full field digital mammography systems using ideal (Hotelling) observer vs. conventional automated analysis of CDMAM images for quality control of contrast-detail characteristics. , 2015, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[9]  Richard Kaczmarek,et al.  Evaluation of automatic exposure control performance in full-field digital mammography systems using contrast-detail analysis , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[10]  S. Gabarda,et al.  Blind image quality assessment through anisotropy. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  B. Keller,et al.  Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation. , 2012, Medical physics.