An empirical test of cooperative game solution concepts

This article reports the largest empirical test to date of cooperative game solution concepts with observations taken from naturally occurring markets. In contrast to some previous empirical tests of cooperative game solution concepts with observations taken from classrooms, the empirical results support the theory of the core in general and the “equal propensity to disrupty” solution concept in particular. The Shapley value and the nucleolus receive weaker empirical support.

[1]  P. Straffin,et al.  Game theory and the tennessee valley authority , 1981 .

[2]  J. S. Ransmeier,et al.  The Tennessee Valley Authority : a case study in the economics of multiple purpose stream planning , 1943 .

[3]  Istvan Bogardi,et al.  Application of game theory in water management , 1976 .

[4]  H. Andrew Michener,et al.  Effects of core properties in four-person games with side-payments , 1979 .

[5]  Andrew Whinston,et al.  Cost allocation for a regional wastewater treatment system , 1979 .

[6]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[7]  K. Yuen,et al.  On the comparative accuracy of lexicographical solutions in cooperative games , 1981 .

[8]  K. Yuen,et al.  A competitive test of the core solution in side‐payment games , 1982 .

[9]  S. C. Littlechild,et al.  The propensity to disrupt and the disruption nucleolus of a characteristic function game , 1976 .

[10]  K. Yuen,et al.  Nonsymmetry and Core Size in N-Person Sidepayment Games , 1980 .

[11]  L. Shapley A Value for n-person Games , 1988 .

[12]  D. Schmeidler The Nucleolus of a Characteristic Function Game , 1969 .

[13]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Complements, mollifiers and the propensity to disrupt , 1978 .

[14]  H. A. Michener,et al.  A test of the von Neumann-Morgenstern stable set solution in cooperative non-sidepayment N-person games , 1984 .

[15]  D. Gately Sharing the Gains from Regional Cooperation: A Game Theoretic Application to Planning Investment in Electric Power , 1974 .

[16]  S. C. Littlechild,et al.  Aircraft Landing Fees: A Game Theory Approach , 1977 .

[17]  M. Nakayama,et al.  The Cost Assignment of the Cooperative Water Resource Development: A Game Theoretical Approach , 1976 .

[18]  H. Young,et al.  Cost allocation in water resources development , 1982 .

[19]  William W. Sharkey,et al.  Suggestions for a Game-Theoretic Approach to Public Utility Pricing and Cost Allocation , 1982 .