GroEL/GroES: structure and function of a two-stroke folding machine.

Recent structural and functional studies have greatly advanced our understanding of the mechanism by which chaperonins (Cpn60) mediate protein folding, the final step in the accurate expression of genetic information. Escherichia coli GroEL has a symmetric double-toroid architecture, which binds nonnative polypeptide substrates on the hydrophobic walls of its central cavity. The asymmetric binding of ATP and cochaperonin GroES to GroEL triggers a major conformational change in the cis ring, creating an enlarged chamber into which the bound nonnative polypeptide is released. The structural changes that create the cis assembly also change the lining of the cavity wall from hydrophobic to hydrophilic, conducive to folding into the native state. ATP hydrolysis in the cis ring weakens it and primes the release of products. When ATP and GroES bind to the trans ring, it forms a stronger assembly, which disassembles the cis complex through negative cooperativity between rings. The opposing function of the two rings operates as if the system had two cylinders, one expelling the products of the reaction as the other loads up the reactants. One cycle of the reaction gives the polypeptide about 15 s to fold at the cost of seven ATP molecules. For some proteins, several cycles of GroEL assistance may be needed in order to achieve their native states.

[1]  F. Hartl,et al.  A molecular chaperone from a thermophilic archaebacterium is related to the eukaryotic protein t-complex polypeptide-1 , 1991, Nature.

[2]  F. Hartl,et al.  Binding of defined regions of a polypeptide to GroEL and its implications for chaperonin-mediated protein folding , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[3]  K. Furtak,et al.  Folding in vivo of bacterial cytoplasmic proteins: Role of GroEL , 1993, Cell.

[4]  M. Kessel,et al.  The protein-folding activity of chaperonins correlates with the symmetric GroEL14(GroES7)2 heterooligomer. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  A. Fersht,et al.  Catalysis of Amide Proton Exchange by the Molecular Chaperones GroEL and SecB , 1996, Science.

[6]  Y. Kashi,et al.  Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release , 1994, Nature.

[7]  F. Hartl,et al.  Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL–GroES chaperonin complex , 1996, Nature.

[8]  Michael B. Yaffe,et al.  TCP1 complex is a molecular chaperone in tubulin biogenesis , 1992, Nature.

[9]  F. Hartl,et al.  Mitochondrial heat-shock protein hsp60 is essential for assembly of proteins imported into yeast mitochondria , 1989, Nature.

[10]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[11]  Yechezkel Kashi,et al.  GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms , 1994, Cell.

[12]  H. Saibil,et al.  T-complex polypeptide-1 is a subunit of a heteromeric particle in the eukaryotic cytosol , 1992, Nature.

[13]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Chaperonin-facilitated refolding of ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase and ATP hydrolysis by chaperonin 60 (groEL) are K+ dependent. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[14]  J. Deisenhofer,et al.  The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution , 1996, Nature.

[15]  G. Lorimer Protein folding Folding with a two-stroke motor , 1997, Nature.

[16]  R. Jaenicke,et al.  Symmetric complexes of GroE chaperonins as part of the functional cycle. , 1994, Science.

[17]  M. Yoshida,et al.  GroEL Locked in a Closed Conformation by an Interdomain Cross-link Can Bind ATP and Polypeptide but Cannot Process Further Reaction Steps* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  M Karplus,et al.  The allosteric mechanism of the chaperonin GroEL: a dynamic analysis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Allosteric control by ATP of non-folded protein binding to GroEL. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  S. Mande,et al.  Structure of the Heat Shock Protein Chaperonin-10 of Mycobacterium leprae , 1996, Science.

[21]  A. Clarke,et al.  Chaperonins can catalyse the reversal of early aggregation steps when a protein misfolds. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  A. Clarke,et al.  The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  A. Joachimiak,et al.  Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small-angle neutron scattering. , 1996, Structure.

[24]  M. Kessel,et al.  Characterization of a functional GroEL14(GroES7)2 chaperonin hetero-oligomer. , 1994, Science.

[25]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. , 1994, Science.

[26]  Helen R Saibil,et al.  The Chaperonin ATPase Cycle: Mechanism of Allosteric Switching and Movements of Substrate-Binding Domains in GroEL , 1996, Cell.

[27]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Hydrolysis of adenosine 5'-triphosphate by Escherichia coli GroEL: effects of GroES and potassium ion. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[28]  A. Fersht,et al.  A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Identification of a second Escherichia coli groE gene whose product is necessary for bacteriophage morphogenesis. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[31]  John O. Thomas,et al.  A cytoplasmic chaperonin that catalyzes β-actin folding , 1992, Cell.

[32]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Reconstitution of active dimeric ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase from an unfolded state depends on two chaperonin proteins and Mg-ATP , 1989, Nature.

[33]  J. Weissman,et al.  Mechanism of GroEL action: Productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under groes , 1995, Cell.

[34]  R. Jaenicke,et al.  GroE facilitates refolding of citrate synthase by suppressing aggregation. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[35]  A. Horwich,et al.  GroEL‐Mediated protein folding , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[36]  W. Baumeister,et al.  A novel ATPase complex selectively accumulated upon heat shock is a major cellular component of thermophilic archaebacteria. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[37]  J. Weissman,et al.  Characterization of the Active Intermediate of a GroEL–GroES-Mediated Protein Folding Reaction , 1996, Cell.

[38]  A. Fersht,et al.  Cooperativity in ATP hydrolysis by GroEL is increased by GroES , 1991, FEBS letters.

[39]  J. Behlke,et al.  Molecular chaperones and their interactions investigated by analytical ultracentrifugation and other methodologies. , 1998, Methods in enzymology.

[40]  H. Saibil,et al.  Binding of chaperonins , 1991, Nature.

[41]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATPγS , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[42]  W. Baumeister,et al.  Chaperonin‐mediated protein folding: GroES binds to one end of the GroEL cylinder, which accommodates the protein substrate within its central cavity. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[43]  A. Horwich,et al.  Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL , 1997, Nature.

[44]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonln GroEL at 2.8 Å , 1994, Nature.

[45]  K. Braig,et al.  A polypeptide bound by the chaperonin groEL is localized within a central cavity. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  A. Horwich,et al.  The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex , 1997, Nature.

[47]  A. Fersht,et al.  Nature and consequences of GroEL-protein interactions. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[48]  K. Willison,et al.  Cystosolic chaperonin subunits have a conserved ATPase domain but diverged polypeptide-binding domains. , 1994, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[49]  G. Lorimer,et al.  A thermodynamic coupling mechanism for GroEL-mediated unfolding. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  F. Hartl,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of groEL through a 'molten globule'-like intermediate , 1991, Nature.

[51]  A. Plückthun,et al.  The Escherichia coli heat shock proteins GroEL and GroES modulate the folding of the beta‐lactamase precursor. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[52]  P. Adams,et al.  Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å resolution , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[53]  C. Anfinsen Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. , 1973, Science.

[54]  H. Taguchi,et al.  Structure of holo‐chaperonin studied with electron microscopy Oligomeric cpn10 on top of two layers of cpn60 rings with two stripes each , 1992, FEBS letters.

[55]  J. Rothman,et al.  Positive cooperativity in the functioning of molecular chaperone GroEL. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[56]  F. Hartl Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding , 1996, Nature.

[57]  T. Atkinson,et al.  Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonin catalytic cycle: implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[58]  Neil A. Ranson,et al.  Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL–GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy , 1994, Nature.

[59]  Lila M. Gierasch,et al.  Characterization of a functionally important mobile domain of GroES , 1993, Nature.

[60]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Purification and properties of the groES morphogenetic protein of Escherichia coli. , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[61]  Robert Huber,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Thermosome, the Archaeal Chaperonin and Homolog of CCT , 1998, Cell.

[62]  E. Eisenstein,et al.  The Hydrophobic Nature of GroEL-Substrate Binding (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.