A Quantitative Evaluation of Joint Activity and Attenuation Reconstruction in TOF PET/MR Brain Imaging

Time-of-flight (TOF) PET data provide an effective means for attenuation correction (AC) when no (or incomplete or inaccurate) attenuation information is available. Since MR scanners provide little information on photon attenuation of different tissue types, AC in hybrid PET/MR scanners has always been challenging. In this contribution, we aim at validating the activity reconstructions of the maximum-likelihood ordered-subsets activity and attenuation (OSAA) reconstruction algorithm on a patient brain data set. We present a quantitative comparison of joint reconstructions with the current clinical gold standard—ordered-subsets expectation maximization—using CT-based AC in PET/CT, as well as the current state of the art in PET/MR, that is, zero time echo (ZTE)–based AC. Methods: The TOF PET emission data were initially used in a preprocessing stage to estimate crystal maps of efficiencies, timing offsets, and timing resolutions. Applying these additional corrections during reconstructions, OSAA, ZTE-based, and the vendor-provided atlas-based AC techniques were analyzed and compared with CT-based AC. In our initial study, we used the CT-based estimate of the expected scatter and later used the ZTE-based and OSAA attenuation estimates to compute the expected scatter contribution of the data during reconstructions. In all reconstructions, a maximum-likelihood scaling of the single-scatter simulation estimate to the emission data was used for scatter correction. The reconstruction results were analyzed in the 86 segmented regions of interest of the Hammers atlas. Results: Our quantitative analysis showed that, in practice, a tracer activity difference of +0.5% (±2.1%) and +0.1% (±2.3%) could be expected for the state-of-the-art ZTE-based and OSAA AC methods, respectively, in PET/MR compared with the clinical gold standard in PET/CT. Conclusion: Joint activity and attenuation estimation methods can provide an effective solution to the challenging AC problem for brain studies in hybrid TOF PET/MR scanners. With an accurate TOF-based (timing offsets and timing resolutions) calibration, and similar to the results of the state-of-the-art method in PET/MR, regional errors of joint TOF PET reconstructions are within a few percentage points.

[1]  Tetsuro Sekine,et al.  Improving PET/MR brain quantitation with template-enhanced ZTE , 2018, NeuroImage.

[2]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  The Validation Problem of Joint Emission/Transmission Reconstruction From TOF-PET Projections , 2018 .

[4]  A. Buck,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Zero-Echo-Time Attenuation Correction for Brain 18F-FDG PET/MRI: Comparison with Atlas Attenuation Correction , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Josef A. Lundman,et al.  Zero TE‐based pseudo‐CT image conversion in the head and its application in PET/MR attenuation correction and MR‐guided radiation therapy planning , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Alexander M. Grant,et al.  NEMA NU 2-2012 performance studies for the SiPM-based ToF-PET component of the GE SIGNA PET/MR system. , 2016, Medical physics.

[7]  Fernando Boada,et al.  Joint Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation in Time-of-Flight PET: A Quantitative Analysis , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  J. Nuyts,et al.  Regional Accuracy of ZTE-Based Attenuation Correction in Static [18F]FDG and Dynamic [18F]PE2I Brain PET/MR , 2018, Front. Phys..

[9]  G. Delso,et al.  Zero TE MR bone imaging in the head , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Michael E Casey,et al.  Evaluation of MLACF based calculated attenuation brain PET imaging for FDG patient studies , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  A multi-centre evaluation of eleven clinically feasible brain PET/MRI attenuation correction techniques using a large cohort of patients , 2016, NeuroImage.

[12]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  ML estimation of the scatter scaling in TOF PET , 2014, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[13]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Quantitative analysis of MRI-guided attenuation correction techniques in time-of-flight brain PET/MRI , 2016, NeuroImage.

[14]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Florian Wiesinger,et al.  Joint estimation of activity and attenuation for PET using pragmatic MR-based prior: application to clinical TOF PET/MR whole-body data for FDG and non-FDG tracers , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Estimation of crystal timings in TOF-PET , 2018, 2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Proceedings (NSS/MIC).

[17]  M. Defrise,et al.  Time-of-flight PET data determine the attenuation sinogram up to a constant , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Data driven time alignment for TOF-PET , 2017, 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[19]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  Three‐dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe , 2003, Human brain mapping.