Physics analysis of the ITER ECW system for optimized performance

A predictive analysis of the capabilities of the ITER electron cyclotron wave system is presented in this work. Modifications of both the upper launcher and the equatorial launcher aimed at increasing the potentialities of the system are identified and discussed. A modification of the upper launcher has already been incorporated in the updated front steering design called the extended physics launcher. By adopting different deposition ranges for the upper and lower steering mirrors, this design offers the flexibility to drive current from the radial region required for the stabilization of neoclassical tearing modes (NTM) up to that required for sawtooth control, allowing a synergy with the equatorial launcher. Here a comparison of the performance of the new design of the upper launcher with those of a dropped upper launcher is performed, showing that better performance for both NTM stabilization and sawtooth control may be obtained by lowering the upper port location. An analysis of the EC current driven by the equatorial launcher is also presented, showing that adding to the present design the possibility to drive counter-current in addition to the existing co-current capability would increase the flexibility of the system. The behaviour of all launchers at reduced magnetic fields is also discussed.

[1]  R. Prater,et al.  Application of Electron Cyclotron Current Drive on ITER , 2005 .

[2]  R J Buttery,et al.  Destabilization of fast-ion-induced long sawteeth by localized current drive in the JET tokamak. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[3]  M. A. Henderson,et al.  ITER ECRH-ECCD System Capabilities for Extended Physics Applications , 2007 .

[4]  M. Rosenbluth,et al.  Model for the sawtooth period and amplitude , 1996 .

[5]  O. Sauter,et al.  Control of neoclassical tearing modes by sawtooth control. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[6]  H. Zohm,et al.  Cross–machine benchmarking for ITER of neoclassical tearing mode stabilization by electron cyclotron current drive , 2006 .

[7]  G. V. Pereverzev,et al.  TORBEAM, a beam tracing code for electron-cyclotron waves in tokamak plasmas , 2001 .

[8]  R. Harvey,et al.  Comparison of optimized ECCD for different launch locations in a next step tokamak reactor plasma , 2001 .

[9]  Francesco Volpe,et al.  Sensitivity of ITER ECRH Upper Launcher to Steering Errors and Changes of Profiles and Integration with Equatorial Launcher , 2005 .

[10]  Olivier Sauter,et al.  Effects of localized electron heating and current drive on the sawtooth period , 2003 .

[11]  O. Sauter,et al.  Control of electron internal transport barriers in TCV , 2004 .

[12]  A. Bondeson,et al.  The CHEASE code for toroidal MHD equilibria , 1996 .

[13]  G. Ramponi,et al.  Capabilities of the ITER Upper Launcher for ELMy-H mode plasmas at low magnetic fields , 2005 .

[14]  E. Poli,et al.  Comparison of the performance of different options for the ITER ECRH Upper Launcher , 2005 .

[15]  C. Giroud,et al.  Scaling of density peaking in JET H-modes and implications for ITER , 2006 .

[16]  N. Kobayashi,et al.  Progress on Design and Development of ITER Equatorial Launcher: Analytical Investigation and R&D of the Launcher Components for the Design Improvement , 2007 .

[17]  Daniela Farina,et al.  A Quasi-Optical Beam-Tracing Code for Electron Cyclotron Absorption and Current Drive: GRAY , 2007 .

[18]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  Sawtooth control in fusion plasmas , 2005 .