Ultrasound decreases the failed labor epidural rate in resident trainees.

BACKGROUND Epidural analgesia is widely used for pain relief during labor. The purpose of this study was to determine if ultrasound measurement of the depth from skin to epidural space before the epidural technique decreases the failure rate of labor analgesia. A secondary objective was to correlate ultrasound depth to the epidural space with actual depth of the needle at placement. METHODS In this prospective, randomized, non-blinded study, 370 parturients requesting labor epidural analgesia were randomized to receive their epidural technique by first year anesthesia residents with or without prior ultrasound determination of epidural space depth. Outcome variables included the incidence of epidural catheter replacement for failed analgesia and the number of epidural attempts and accidental dural punctures. RESULTS The ultrasound group had fewer epidural catheter replacements (P<0.02), and epidural placement attempts (P<0.01) compared to the control group. Pearson's correlation coefficients comparing the actual versus ultrasound estimated depth to the epidural space in the longitudinal median and transverse planes were 0.914 and 0.909, respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficient comparing the ultrasound estimated depths to the epidural space in the transverse and longitudinal median planes was 0.940. No significant differences were noted with respect to staff interventions, top-ups, accidental dural punctures, and delivery outcome. CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound measurement of the epidural space depth before epidural technique placement decreases the rate of epidural catheter replacements for failed labor analgesia, and reduces the number of epidural attempts when performed by first year residents and compared to attempts without ultrasound guidance.

[1]  Measurement of the depth to the extradural space using ultrasound. , 1984, British journal of anaesthesia.

[2]  T. Bogard,et al.  Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries. , 2004, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[3]  R. Collis,et al.  The management of accidental dural puncture during labour epidural analgesia: a survey of UK practice * , 2005, Anaesthesia.

[4]  P. Hopkins Ultrasound guidance as a gold standard in regional anaesthesia. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.

[5]  A. Jadad,et al.  PDPH is a common complication of neuraxial blockade in parturients: a meta-analysis of obstetrical studies , 2003, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[6]  Sharon Davies,et al.  Ultrasound Using the Transverse Approach to the Lumbar Spine Provides Reliable Landmarks for Labor Epidurals , 2007, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[7]  J. Carvalho,et al.  Ultrasound-facilitated epidurals and spinals in obstetrics. , 2008, Anesthesiology clinics.

[8]  T. Grau,et al.  The lumbar epidural space in pregnancy: visualization by ultrasonography. , 2001, British journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  T. Grau,et al.  Paramedian access to the epidural space: the optimum window for ultrasound imaging. , 2001, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[10]  Thomas Grau,et al.  Efficacy of ultrasound imaging in obstetric epidural anesthesia. , 2002, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[11]  S. Kapral,et al.  Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. , 2005, British journal of anaesthesia.

[12]  C. McCartney Ultrasound guidance for regional anaesthesia. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  M. Rosen,et al.  Shnider and Levinson's Anesthesia for Obstetrics , 2002 .

[14]  Ki Jinn Chin,et al.  Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blockade , 2008, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.