Pressures on a cubic building—Part 1: Full-scale results

Abstract Pressures on the vertical and horizontal centrelines of the Silsoe 6m cube are presented. The full-scale data has been processed in 12 min non-overlapping record blocks of cube surface tap pressure together with the reference upstream approach flow measured at cube height. Since in full-scale one has to accept the wind conditions provided by nature, each block of data is unique in regards to even the mean conditions and there is no opportunity to exactly replicate a test multiple times, as might be done in a wind tunnel. As a result the data are processed in a manner that makes use of the large number of blocks recorded. Pressure coefficients are determined by normalising with the wind dynamic pressure at the reference position. The mean, standard deviation, maximum and minimum pressure coefficients are determined by normalising the measured pressures by the mean, standard deviation and maximum wind dynamic pressure, respectively. It is concluded that using this normalising process helps to minimise the uncertainty of the results. A least squares optimisation method is used to fit a truncated Fourier series to the pressure coefficient data over the 360° of flow direction. The differences between the data points and the fitted curves are used to assess the uncertainty associated with each type of coefficient. It is shown that typically 90% of the normalised data lies within a band of ±0.1 for the mean pressure coefficient and ±18% for the standard deviation coefficient. However with the maximum and minimum pressure coefficients the uncertainty is higher and asymmetric, and is best modelled as a combination of a fixed amount plus a percentage of the coefficient. The highest uncertainty noted was for the minimum coefficient where 90% of the data lies between about +0.1–16% of the coefficient and −0.1+25% of the coefficient. It is shown that all of the pressure coefficients determined form a consistent set, which exhibit sensible variations with both position and wind direction. It is believed that this set of data offers opportunities for the assessment of wind tunnel and CFD models, which has not been previously possible.

[1]  Peter Richards,et al.  Pressures on a cubic building—Part 2: Quasi-steady and other processes , 2012 .

[2]  Theodore Stathopoulos,et al.  Design recommendations for wind loading on buildings of intermediate height , 1989 .

[3]  Norbert Hölscher,et al.  Towards quality assurance for wind tunnel tests: A comparative testing program of the Windtechnologische Gesellschaft , 1998 .

[4]  T. G. Thomas,et al.  Simulation of skewed turbulent flow past a surface mounted cube , 1999 .

[5]  S. Murakami,et al.  COMPARISON OF VARIOUS TURBULENCE MODELS APPLIED TO A BLUFF BODY , 1993 .

[6]  Peter Richards,et al.  The folly of using extreme-value methods in full-scale experiments , 1996 .

[7]  N. G. Wright,et al.  Non-linear k–ε turbulence model results for flow over a building at full-scale , 2003 .

[8]  Shuzo Murakami,et al.  Current status and future trends in computational wind engineering , 1997 .

[9]  A. C. Nikkelsen,et al.  Evaluation of the use of numerical K−ϵ model Kameleon II, for predicting wind pressures on building surfaces , 1995 .

[10]  Large-eddy simulation of wind effects on bluff bodies using the finite element method , 1997 .

[11]  Peter Richards,et al.  Wind pressures on a 6m cube , 2001 .

[12]  Hiroshi Sakamoto,et al.  Flow around a cubic body immersed in a turbulent boundary layer , 1982 .

[13]  Peter Richards,et al.  A 6m cube in an atmospheric boundary layer flow. Part I. Full-scale and wind-tunnel results , 2002 .

[14]  Peter Richards,et al.  Quasi-steady theory and point pressures on a cubic building , 2004 .

[15]  Peter Richards,et al.  Flow reattachment on the roof of a 6 m cube , 2006 .

[16]  P Moran,et al.  A probe for sensing static pressure in two-dimensional flow , 1979 .

[17]  Shuzo Murakami,et al.  3-D numerical simulation of airflow around a cubic model by means of the k-ϵ model , 1988 .

[18]  C. J. Apelt,et al.  Simulation of flow past a cube in a turbulent boundary layer , 1990 .

[19]  Peter Richards,et al.  Full-scale wind load measurements point the way forward , 1995 .

[20]  Peter Richards,et al.  Wind loads on the roof of a 6 m cube , 2008 .

[21]  A. Hunt,et al.  Wind-tunnel measurements of surface pressures on cubic building models at several scales , 1982 .

[22]  C. X. Zhang,et al.  Numerical predictions of turbulent recirculating flows with a κ-ϵ model , 1994 .

[23]  A. Robins,et al.  The flow around a surface-mounted cube in uniform and turbulent streams , 1977, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  P. Richards,et al.  Wind-tunnel modelling of the Silsoe Cube , 2007 .

[25]  Peter Richards,et al.  A 6 m cube in an atmospheric boundary layer flow -Part 2. Computational solutions , 2002 .

[26]  James R. McDonald,et al.  The application of the Quasi-steady Theory to full scale measurements on the Texas Tech building , 1993 .

[27]  P. Richards,et al.  Unsteady flow on the sides of a 6m cube , 2002 .

[28]  Nicolas G. Wright,et al.  Comparison of several computational turbulence models with full-scale measurements of flow around a building , 1999 .

[29]  R. Hoxey,et al.  Bluff bodies in deep turbulent boundary layers: Reynolds-number issues , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  Frank Baetke,et al.  Numerical simulation of turbulent flow over surface-mounted obstacles with sharp edges and corners , 1990 .

[31]  Theodore Stathopoulos,et al.  Computational wind engineering: Past achievements and future challenges , 1997 .

[32]  Jianming He,et al.  COMPUTATION OF TURBULENT SHEAR FLOW OVER SURFACE-MOUNTED OBSTACLE , 1992 .

[33]  D. Lakehal,et al.  Numerical approach for wind loads prediction on buildings and structures , 1995 .