Systemic Lisbon Battery: Normative Data for Memory and Attention Assessments

Background Memory and attention are two cognitive domains pivotal for the performance of instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). The assessment of these functions is still widely carried out with pencil-and-paper tests, which lack ecological validity. The evaluation of cognitive and memory functions while the patients are performing IADLs should contribute to the ecological validity of the evaluation process. Objective The objective of this study is to establish normative data from virtual reality (VR) IADLs designed to activate memory and attention functions. Methods A total of 243 non-clinical participants carried out a paper-and-pencil Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and performed 3 VR activities: art gallery visual matching task, supermarket shopping task, and memory fruit matching game. The data (execution time and errors, and money spent in the case of the supermarket activity) was automatically generated from the app. Results Outcomes were computed using non-parametric statistics, due to non-normality of distributions. Age, academic qualifications, and computer experience all had significant effects on most measures. Normative values for different levels of these measures were defined. Conclusions Age, academic qualifications, and computer experience should be taken into account while using our VR-based platform for cognitive assessment purposes.

[1]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  The Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Tests: A Review of the Literature on Everyday Cognitive Skills , 2003, Neuropsychology Review.

[2]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  GPOWER: A general power analysis program , 1996 .

[3]  A. Ptito,et al.  Independence in managing one's finances after traumatic brain injury , 2011, Brain injury.

[4]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[7]  P. Lees-Haley,et al.  Forensic neuropsychological test usage: An empirical survey , 1996 .

[8]  N. Pachana,et al.  Ecological validity in neuropsychological assessment: a case for greater consideration in research with neurologically intact populations. , 2006, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[9]  D. Harvey,et al.  Cognitive and neuroimaging predictors of instrumental activities of daily living , 2007, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[10]  T. Ownsworth,et al.  Memory remediation in long-term acquired brain injury: two approaches in diary training. , 1999, Brain injury.

[11]  Wayne J. Camara,et al.  Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. , 2000 .

[12]  A. Baddeley.  The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  P Wehman,et al.  Return to work for persons with traumatic brain injury. , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[14]  W. McKinlay,et al.  Return to work within the first seven years of severe head injury. , 1987, Brain injury.

[15]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The relationship between working memory capacity and executive functioning: evidence for a common executive attention construct. , 2010, Neuropsychology.

[16]  Christianna S. Williams,et al.  Alcohol Use and Functional Disability Among Cognitively Impaired Adults , 1999, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[17]  J. Adair,et al.  Performance-Based Everyday Functioning after Stroke: Relationship with IADL Questionnaire and Neurocognitive Performance , 2011, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[18]  A. Baddeley.  Working Memory, Thought, and Action , 2007 .

[19]  Carolina Bottari,et al.  The criterion-related validity of the IADL Profile with measures of executive functions, indices of trauma severity and sociodemographic characteristics , 2009, Brain injury.

[20]  J. Buhle,et al.  Typologies of attentional networks , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  P. Gamito,et al.  Virtual Kitchen Test , 2014, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[22]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  Pedro Gamito,et al.  Normative data for a cognitive VR rehab serious games-based approach , 2014, PervasiveHealth.

[24]  Á. Silva,et al.  Adaptação à população portuguesa da tradução do Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) , 1994 .

[25]  M. Guerreiro,et al.  Novos valores Normativos do mini-mental state examination , 2009 .

[26]  A. Nobre,et al.  The noradrenergic alpha2 agonist clonidine modulates behavioural and neuroanatomical correlates of human attentional orienting and alerting. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[28]  Thomas D. Parsons,et al.  Neuropsychological Assessment Using Virtual Environments: Enhanced Assessment Technology for Improved Ecological Validity , 2011 .

[29]  R. Reitan.  Validity of the Trail Making Test as an Indicator of Organic Brain Damage , 1958 .

[30]  Uta Boehm,et al.  Attention Theory And Practice , 2016 .

[31]  Bin Bo,et al.  Development of a Smartphone Application to Measure Physical Activity Using Sensor-Assisted Self-Report , 2013, Front. Public Health.